Sentences with phrase «other writers writing»

How do you compare yourself to other writers writing about the India experience?

Other writers write on the walls you've erected around them and find ways to work with the story.

While writing a summary, we point out the central theme and reviews it while writing a critique we just add writer's own analysis and evaluation of other writer writing and compare them to make it critique.

A hard to question to answer as I don't know how other writers write.

The other writer wrote the most crap I've ever read on travel blogs about Bali... like no public display of affection, cover arms and legs at all times etc...

Not exact matches

There are two ways to get blog content: write it yourself or get other writers to contribute.

Scripted is a content - creation service through which small - business owners can immediately hire professional content - marketing writers to produce white papers, blog articles, or other writing projects for your company, at affordable prices.

Meyer - Shine and a bunch of other writers have a simple suggestion: have a bucket list if you want, but also write a «reverse bucket list.»

So the Canada office was restructured in June, with two political writers moving to Washington and a number of other shuffles, and Silverman started writing more about media.

Several lesser - known entrepreneurs claim writing out their thoughts longhand has helped focus their thinking, while other writers and experts also suggest keeping a work journal.

But I'm one of those writers Melissa mentioned who writes for several sites other than my own — most paid, a couple not.

I'm tasked to organically grow Daily Capital, Personal Capital's blog by managing the editorial calendar, work with a team of writers to produce new content, write the occasional post, collaborate with other departments to market their work, and engage Personal Capital's ~ 450,000 users.

Whether one agrees with his politics or thinks he'd be a competent president is a different matter — but thank you for writing a great article on religion and avoiding the attacking, degrading and slandering of other writers» approach, which - while probably provoking interest and getting many reads - is simply disappointing and quite frankly hypocritical when it comes to religion.

Also, I couldn't quite get this into words as I was writing before, so: I am believe that I am correct in my view of Scripture as it has been handed down to me from teachers, preachers, writers and others; I believe that I am correct in my beliefs about who God is, and about His self - revelation, in the same way that all people believe that the opinions they hold are true.

Writers such as Brian McClaren, Tony Jones, Doug Pagitt, Peter Rollins, and Rob Bell are quick to write off historical doctrines and hesitant to assert anything other than approximate truths.

Of course there are other reasons for my sporadic blogging this year: a surprise new baby coming which completely disoriented us, a new book to finish writing (and I will share all about that in January), travelling and speaking all over North America, stewarding the message of Jesus Feminist throughout her first year of life, creating the Jesus Feminist collection with Imagine Goods, a trip to Haiti, new opportunities as a writer, three tinies at home with their own lives and drama and growth and change, remodelling parts of our home, marriage, church, friends, life, work, laundry (oh, can we talk laundry?!)

I consider that men DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writers.

We talked a bit about how I became a writer, discouragement, finding your voice, blogging, the difference between blogging and book writing, why I decided to write Jesus Feminist, my process as a writer, and the best (and worst) parts of writing among other things.

And we have all watched you boldly take the way of abundance — no matter how it seemed like it didn't matter — because God makes meaning out of messes, because He is the God who can make all our brokenness into abundance, because, you and I say this back to each other over and over again: The Writer of the story has written Himself into the hardest places of yours and is softening the broken edges of everything with redeeming, abundant grace.»

And then technology and culture moved on, but the industry didn't keep up, and in the meantime, artists kept making music and writers kept writing and had to find other ways to support themselves.

When writing of this relationship, Paul along with many other New Testament writers, tells his readers that it is given by and enabled by God's Spirit.

Some are essays about being a woman and others are persuasive arguments.Some of them are written by church leaders, one is written by a best - selling tv - writer.

But I always think best when I write, and I always appreciate the interaction from other thinkers and writers (that's YOU), and so am going to write this series of posts and see where they lead.

No, I expect written accounts verifying that something happened from someone other than a writer with an agenda.

I honestly and truly try my absolute hardest to always reference and footnote and give credit to other authors, thinkers, writers, bloggers, and theologians when I know that what I am writing originated with them.

New York Times writer and avowed agnostic Nicholas Kristof has written about how Christians — in particular, evangelicals — are consistently the first to arrive, the last to leave and the most generous whenever he covers poverty, disaster, disease or other horrific events.

«It is quite proper for biblical theologians to judge that a particular passage represents a more central, or higher, or more positive contribution than others do,» Barr writes, «and conversely to judge that another passage, or theme, or writer represents an unfortunate turning, a declension or deterioration.»

I remembered Brennan Manning — the man who has translated the love of God in a way that I could receive it more than probably any other writer — was addicted to alcohol and I re-read up one of his last books before he died: «All is Grace: A Ragamuffin Memoir» where he vulnerably writes about what this battle has cost him, even as he experienced the unending and unconditional love of God in the midst of it, how he experienced regret and pain and loss alongside of the love and tenderness of God in this dependency.

Thus C. H. Dodd writes, «for John the crucifixion itself is so truly Christ's exaltation and glory (in its meaning, that is to say), that the resurrection can hardly have for him precisely the same significance that it has for some other writers».28

One aims to find out what the writer actually wrote; the other attempts to understand what he wrote in the light of his circumstances.

He has now written a memoir, Organized Labor and the Church: Reflections of a «Labor Priest» (Paulist Press), and in it he reflects on, among many other things, the 1980s dustup with the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD), a Washington organization that this writer helped to get going.

what is what if these scrolls writers (assuming they r independent from each other or from different times) were just writing like a fairy tale story.

More than common circumstances, however, what drew me and so many other young writers to L'Engle was her articulation of the writing life as a sacred art.

There were other issues too: The way the accounts of Israel's monarchy contradicted one another, the way Jesus and Paul quoted Hebrew Scripture in ways that seemed to stretch the original meaning, the fact that women were considered property in Levitical Law, the way both science and archeology challenged the historicity of so many biblical texts, and the fact that it was nearly impossible for me to write a creative retelling of Resurrection Day because each of the gospel writers tell the story so differently, sometimes with contradictory details.

For the story I'm writing, well - known published writers in our critique group, who were getting their stuff published in paper by CBA publishers commented, among other things: - «The scene where Tammy throws her bikini up into the tree would never get published by a CBA publisher.»

Ultimately, maybe these smaller writing project will get me to the place where I can be a full - time writer, and then tackle that project while also writing about other things.

Jesus the Son of Marry (Peace and blessings be up on him) is known today to the Christian world as it is being described by John, Paul, Luke and others... whatever the way these human imagined him became the faith... record shows that the first book of NT was written at least 60 - 80 years after Jesus the son of Marry was taken away from this earth... and these writers used their vision as a weapon to get it to the brain of mankind... also there are debates among the Christian scholars that no one knows who is the writer of some of the gospels... someone else wrote it and used the names what we see today... i.e. no one knows when and who and how the Hebrew chapters were written... despite of lots of controversy on this, Christian scholars uses them to teach others...

He wrote and wrote and wrote» a discipline of writing that almost every other writer I know has told me feels like an indictment: the books, and the innumerable essays, and all those talks he flew around to give.

Of this tough - minded writer, Faludi says that she writes, «sometimes in starry - eyed terms, of women's inordinate capacity for kindness, service to others, and cooperation.»

All the other books, non-cannonical as well, could be gathered together as «everything said before Jesus, by the Jewish writers, and everything post Jesus that was written about the early church, or early writings that were not specifically what Jesus said and did.

Do you believe that God also «inspired» writers from other cultures to write what they did?

Certain writers are better than others — read everything Tony Woodlief writes — and it can occasionally be a little too predictable in its kind thoughtfulness.

Writing in 1979, just before the Melbourne Conference, he pointed out that contemporary writers such as Max Warren, Hans Margull, D.T. Niles, Moltmann, Rutti, and several others viewed mission in such a perspective.

So when you lean on what other men have thought up by their own reasoning, you will fall short of God's truth, the writers of the Bible were influenced by God, The Holy Spirit to write what they wrote, they did nt do this to reveal their own truth, they did this to reveal God's truth.

Examples of these human marks include the fact that the Bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, that the Old Testament world was a world of temples, priests and sacrifice, that Israel as well as the surrounding nations has prophets that mediated divine will to them, that Israel was ruled by kings, that Israel's legal system shares striking similarities with those of surrounding nations, that the creation narrative and the story of Noah resemble other ancient stories of the time, that the writers of Scripture operated within the paradigm of ancient cosmology, etc..

here's a baffling question... if it's good theology to believe that Paul was chosen after the others for a reason, then why is he the earliest NT writer... what wd be the purpose of all that seemingly more primitive understanding of the gospel (the synoptics) coming together as written traditions after the Pauline high water mark?

If you study all the flaws in scripture, the theological inconsistencies which are everywhere, the obvious different writing styles and favorite words, phrases and themes of the various writers, the typo errors (like 1Corinthians 14:22), the differences in reporting (wqs there really one Gadarene demoniac or two), and hundreds of other problems, you start to understand why there are more than twenty thousand denominations in the state of California alone, all of them claiming the truth.

And it is not that John was unaware of the idea of repentance, for aside from Luke, he uses the term repentance more than any other New Testament writer in the other books of the Bible he has written.

The book, The Courage for Truth: Letters to Other Writers, starts with several written to Evelyn Waugh between 1948 and 1952.

Occasional remarks are found such as «before there reigned any king over the children of Israel» (Genesis 36:31), which seem to imply that from the standpoint of the writer the monarchy had already been established; and «the Canaanite was then in the land» (Genesis 12:6, 13:7), which implied that it was being written after Hebrew occupation; and finally repeated instances of the use of the phrase «on the other side of the Jordan,» in reference to events occurring in the lifetime of Moses, which led scholars to doubt if Moses could have been the author at least of the whole of the Pentateuch.