If you noticed, shortly after the resolution was voted on and passed, the AFT, Ravitch, (tenured nobodies whom I refuse to make famous) and
others against school choice were quick to release statements in support of the resolution.
Not exact matches
His investigation continues, and he expects more claims to be brought
against other food service providers over rebates that not only create «an inherent conflict of interest» in the
choice of foods children are served at
school, but also discourage the use of locally produced goods from smaller suppliers, including local farmers.
When we look to test - based evidence — and look no further — to decide whether
choice «works,» we are making two rather extraordinary, unquestioned assumptions: that the sole purpose of
schooling is to raise test scores, and that district
schools have a place of privilege
against which all
other models must justify themselves.
Last August, the American Civil Liberties Union won the latest in a series of lawsuits
against single - sex public
schools in a district where, it argued, children were given no
other choice.
And so
school choice advocates are watching the Douglas County case closely, hopeful that the Colorado court will either provide a salutary precedent for similar cases in
other states or rule
against the district and give the U.S. Supreme Court the opportunity to extend the logic of Trinity and rule all Blaine Amendments unconstitutional.
And though opponents of
school choice have a long list of complaints (some more valid than
others), they are hardly powerless to address them, provided they recognize that working with (rather than
against) the
choice movement is in their enlightened self - interest.
In two separate lawsuits, opponents of educational
choice alleged that Nevada's ESA violated the state constitution's mandate that the state provide a «uniform system of common
schools» (Article 11, Section 2), its prohibition
against using public funds for sectarian purposes (Article 11, Section 6), and a clause requiring the state to appropriate funds to operate the district
schools before any
other appropriation is enacted for the biennium (Article 11, Section 10).
For example, they urge the introduction of «managed or controlled
choice» under which «students would be assigned to
schools based on their preferences in a way that balanced their interests
against the interests of
other students and the community as a whole.»
Johnson sees the portrayal by Patrick and
others of a dysfunctional public
school system as a rhetorical ploy to advance narrow private interests, and he hopes that the Senate can keep the bill from coming to a vote where legislators can be pressured into a «for us or
against us» position on
school choice.
If it were politics, our government wouldn't even allow parents the
choice to move to
other districts «for the great
schools» if it went
against majority vote.
Another criticism is that your editor and
others are essentially fighting
against expanding
school choice because we believe that working with the future Trump Administration means compromising our promise to defend all children.
But Jensen notes that
other Democrats, including Wright and Cates, «actively campaigned
against school choice» and lost.
In the film, the single mom teams up with
others to turn the failing
school into a charter
school and the teachers union fights
against reforms, such as greater teacher accountability and more
school choice.
Decrying lawmakers who are
against public education and favor
school choice initiatives, Johnson explained how Pastors for Texas Children works to encourage lawmakers to support public
schools and how his group and
others are aiming to get education - friendly candidates elected.
From opposing the expansion of high - quality charter
schools and
other school choice options, to its opposition to Parent Trigger laws and efforts of Parent Power activists in places such as Connecticut and California, to efforts to eviscerate accountability measures that hold districts and
school operators to heel for serving Black and Brown children well, even to their historic disdain for Black families and condoning of Jim Crow discrimination
against Black teachers, both unions have proven no better than outright White Supremacists when it comes to addressing the legacies of bigotry in which American public education is the nexus.
Before we rail
against charter
schools, or any
other form of non-traditional
school, and thereby throw our weight behind political initiatives that will limit the access of families to
schools of their
choice, we need to check our privilege.
Other European nations» experiences with robust
school choice refute the canards that are raised
against vouchers in the United States.
The state superintendent race pits two former
school district superintendents and longtime educators
against each
other — a proponent of expanding
school choices and an opponent of the state expansion of taxpayer - funded
school vouchers.