Sentences with phrase «others argue over»

Is he fast, Ive heard others argue over this.

Others argued over the valuations of various international subsidiaries and assets, such as intellectual property and the growing Asian business.

Not exact matches

But other economists argue that if inflation is a monetary issue, and a helicopter drop of cash is fundamentally fiscal, then the worry over sparking inflation is misplaced.

The social network may argue that it doesn't tell its publishing partners what they should be creating for that money, but the fact that it is pushing video — and that its algorithm clearly favors certain kinds of video content over other kinds — helps determine what gets promoted.

He argues that most negotiators are overly willing to compromise, and he blames this on the way that some win - win adherents prize «relationships» over getting the best possible deal — a style of negotiating that others, especially non-U.S. negotiators, go out of their way to exploit.

In court documents filed with the Northern California District Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.»

Representatives with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Microsoft, Facebook, Dropbox, AOL, Airbnb, IAC, Netflix, Qualcomm, Yahoo and Google, among others, have all argued over the years for creating an entrepreneur visa.

Taking politics and central bank as two legs or arms of administration, we see Evans - Pritchard arguing that the other limb can take over if the one limb does not do its job, like Keynes had judged.

131 A manufacturer would not favor its retail subsidiary over others unless it was cheaper to do so — in which case, Bork argued, discriminating would yield efficiencies that the firm would pass on to consumers.

Some economists have argued, for example, that if a central bank keeps real interest rates low (but positive) over the long term and allows for moderate inflation, a country with its own currency can increase spending very substantially over the long term without increasing taxes. PEF Blogger, Arun Dubois, has blogged extensively about some of these other perspectives.

«There is no need to «de-Christianize» each other over the matter,» wrote Jim Garlow, an influential California pastor, in a five - page memo this week arguing that evangelicals can attend Beck's rally and partner with the television and radio personality in good conscience.

Why don't we stop arguing about how stupid one religion is over the other and just let people live their lives.

It saddens me to see any argueing going on over this and any other issues at this particular place.

In light of historical events, one might argue against her views on the Eichmann trial but most certainly not that the theme of banality reflected anything other than despair over the German Jewish community's failure to recognize the pervasiveness of the system and the corrosion of the legal groundwork of its Nazi - infected mass movements.

Could it be God likes to see all these grubby humans groping around, arguing with each other over how long our hair can be and whether to cut our beards?

There are over 30 extra biblical writings concerning Jesus discovered so far, some debating Christs claims to divinity and others arguing various opinions as regards the empty tomb.

His solution, following his own reading of Whitehead's doctrine of societies, is to argue that an organism or compound individual entity exists wherever one of its constituent subsocieties is dominant over the other subsocieties within the organism (PEW 215).

Now, as many of them argue for forcing others to do what they want, like forcing doctors to refer women to abortionists or even participate in abortions themselves, the traditional goal «has been thrown over in favor of a crusade to establish what might be called... «comprehensive liberalism» as the official pseudo-religion of the state.»

There are only humans arguing with each other over who has the more authentic personal supernatural experience which condemns others..

Economists argue that it is not their business, or the business of the public, to prefer one set of desired goods over others.

whilst arguing the absolute superiority of Judaism over Christianity and Islam, regarded both the other religions as having a role in preparing for the Messiah, because they helped to spread monotheism.11

The characters involved in this affair (Keegan - Michael Key and Annie Parisse) often argue with each other over whether or not they're definitely «bad people,» and the show wants viewers to engage in this debate as well.

It might be argued that Swift's public - facing shift toward strict corporate musicianship is a maturation, but for what seems like every other celebrity in 2017, maturation came with a degree of outspokenness and ownership over certain issues.

Perhaps, if more peoiple used their actual brains, we wouldn't have all these religious nutters arguing over which candidate can «out Jesus» the other.

Not only is the widespread emphasis on winning over others less than Christian, argues the writer, but even the concept of «doing one's best» is easily perverted into workaholism and pride.

On a side note, it's odd to see people arguing over religion considering all of the other problems in America.

Christians must not claim that Christian revelation makes Christianity superior to other religions, she believes: «What Christianity has going for it is its substantive proposal of a way of life — a way of life over which Christians argue in the effort to witness to and be disciples of Christ, and with which they enter into argument with others.»

DeSalvo, whose previous work includes an edition of an early version of one of Virginia Woolf's novels and a collection of letters from Vita Sackville - West to Woolf, argues that other biographers of Woolf (particularly Quentin Bell) have glossed over the formative traumas of her early life, dismissing them as unimportant and in effect blaming the victim for the abuse she suffered.

This is faintly reminiscent of Edward J. Carnell's The Case for Orthodox Theology, which argued that some parts of Scripture must take priority over other parts.

That was written in a time when it was true, before Christians argued over how many angels can fit on the head of a pin, whether to use grape juiceor wine in the communion class, and whether women should wear doilies on their head when they pray, and a myriad of other stupid destructive timewasting ideologies designed to keep us running around with 1 foot nailed to the floor.

Former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and renowned atheist Richard Dawkins have signed a letter in the Daily Telegraph along with over 60 others, arguing that the cap on the number of religious students at faith schools should stay.

They frankly argue not for a Christian (or Jewish or Islamic) monotheism, but for what H. Richard Niebuhr called henotheism, that is, loyalty to the «god of my country over all others.»

However, today those hostile to modernity have argued that Western power leads only to the mastery of some men over others.

It is not my purpose to argue for the correctness of one or the other view of education, only to note that these are issues over which reasonable people may differ, and to question whether the State has a right to impose the first approach in the face of opposition from parents.

On the other, it provided terms in which post-Nicene church fathers would argue over the relationship of divinity and humanity in Christ.

@Chad «I have never seen anyone successfully argue that Hitlers actions were anything other than motivated by german nationalism, however, I do think horrendous theology in Christianity over the centuries has contributed a great deal to anti-semitism, so I do think we as Christians have an ownership of a great deal of the holocaust and I wont shy away from that.

It is not necessarily an idea worth arguing over, especially if it gets in the way of loving others.

I have christian friends from other churchs and there women do these things and they do it because that is how they interpret the word.Its optional and not inforced by the church or by there husbands.They do it as an act of worship to the Lord.The point is how you interpret the word that was what i was getting at as we know the word is the inspired word of God to understand it we need the inspiration of the holy spirit otherwise the word is dead and brings no life.In the case of mother etta she was called to preach and God used her as an evengelist in her day her ministry grew she witnessed to thousands she healed the sick and saved the lost you can argue over a point but the proof is there that God uses women just as he uses men in ministry today.

It's sad to see how we, as people, argue with each other over who owns the truth, while our reilious leaders sit back and laugh... Jesus, Moses, Mohammed, Budda all said that we should respect each other, and yet, we are all here saying who is right and who is not... I believe that we should stop using Religion as an excuse to force our own beliefs upon other people... Druids are offically a Religion, simply a different way to believe in God's work, in my opinion... good for them... oh..

In the pioneering early modern secular states, notably the Dutch Republic, Gregory argues, men and women decided to stop killing each other over what seemed hopelessly irresolvable religious differences, and went shopping instead.

If that were true, Christians, since their beginnings, would not have been constantly arguing with each other over what they interpret differently.

Remember this is a culture that had to argue over slavery and other basic civil rights, so the power of evil is still prevalent.

Then we wouldn't have to argue about whether there is a god or not, and we wouldn't have to kill each other over which god is real.

Like John Cobb, Ruether argues that humans» special ability to view the whole web of life grants them profound responsibilities for other creatures but no privileges over them.

I remember it said that Martin Buber and Gandhi argued over nonviolent resistance of the horrible, violent acts of other.

Except I would argue that these really aren't two different institutions, but one that is succeeding in fulfilling its call in service to people, and the other one is failing in that it is achieving dominion over them.

Where has all this money gone to, and why are we wasting time arguing over 500k, when yes, we could potentially lose the player over penny pinching, as we have done more times than I care to think of, losing club transforming players to other clubs while Wenger is arguing over tuppence, and we aren't spending the time bringing in players which the club desperately needs to compete.

But compared to some of the other clubs top keepers, he certainly wouldn't be argued over who is best.

And before the season was over, during a weekend, one of my ManU friend was ranting insults at Arsenal, that is when my nerves jumped to 6th gear and i argued for at least a couple of hours and insulting ManU and all other teams in turn.

While others argued in favour of showing faith in the coach who has led them to multiple trophies over the last two seasons, along with the players who have played a huge role in that success, others weren't happy with Karim Benzema's inclusion in particular, as seen in the tweets below.