Sentences with phrase «others claim worked»

Although fault wouldn't have been difficult to find due to there likely being a negligence issue, the medical payments to others claim worked quickly and efficiently to provide for the injured party.

Although fault wouldn't have been difficult to find due to there likely being a negligence issue, the medical payments to others claim worked quickly and efficiently to provide for the injured party.

Not exact matches

China's Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin told reporters that Trump's previous claims that the country had created global warming to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive simply couldn't be true because other Republican presidents worked on climate negotiations.

This strategy worked so well for him — he claims a 12 % annualized return between 1997 and 2001, despite the dot - com bust — that he decided others could benefit from his approach.

In other words, he will work with the examiner to find a way to amend your claims so that they can be patented.

Many cited their busy work schedules (37 percent) while others claimed that they simply couldn't afford it (29 percent).

In a speech he made a day after Jobs's death, former Apple evangelist Guy Kawasaki (who claims to have survived working for Jobs twice), also spoke about Jobs's remarkable ability to evoke greatness from others.

Several lesser - known entrepreneurs claim writing out their thoughts longhand has helped focus their thinking, while other writers and experts also suggest keeping a work journal.

Since the series debuted, Demos and Ricciardi have spent a fair amount of time defending their work against claims (from the likes of Kratz and others) that the documentary is unfairly skewed in Avery's favor.

Of course executives must to tread carefully when claiming that a CEO's personal life is affecting the work of others, particularly when a CEO's alleged problems are grist for the office rumour mill.

But at least a few of TDCJ's other claims seem suspect: TDCJ posted to Facebook a series of photographs and videos of staff handing food and water to inmates in a dry prison yard, but inmate family members and NLG assert that some of the employees pictured were no longer working at those units, and allege that TDCJ must have recycled the photographs from a previous event.

The Kamens claim the main thing that distinguishes their foundation from other brain tumor foundations is their focus on pediatric brain cancer specifically, as well as their close ties with pharmaceutical and biotech companies working in the fields of immunotherapy and target gene therapy.

According to Living Goods, clients may also be reluctant to buy drugs from other private providers because of the risk of getting a counterfeit medicine.63 Living Goods sent us a study conducted at the midline of its RCT that claims that both availability of counterfeit drugs and drug prices decreased at private retailers in areas where CHPs worked.64 According to the study, about 37 % of private drug shops in the areas it studied sold fake ACT drugs, 65 and availabilty of fake ACTs was about 50 % lower among non-Living Goods sellers in the areas where Living Goods worked.66 Additional results on these potential effects will be made available when the full RCT is published.

Since QE2 in November 2010, there have been two and half million new jobs created and I don't claim credit for all those jobs, and of course many other factors are at work, but I think that it (monetary policy) has been constructive.

Is this a Lieutenant Governor in Council Policy or total incompetence at AHS??? Or is it Staff reluctant to do the extra paper work and not having access to billing code numbers such as the staff at the dentist office or other health services who can claim the benefit directly??

On October 8, 2014, JPMC agreed to pay up to $ 12 million to settle claims that certain of its tellers and other bank employees — a total of approximately 145,000 employees in 12 states — were not paid proper wages or overtime because JPMC did not count some hours worked.

We shall not be liable or responsible for any damages, or claims, or losses, or injuries, or delays, or accidents, or costs, or business interruption costs, or any other expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees or the costs of any claim or suit), or for any incidental, or direct, or indirect, or general, or special, or punitive, or exemplary, or consequential damages, or loss of goodwill or business profits, or loss of digital currency or digital assets, or work stoppage, or data loss, or computer failure or malfunction, or any other commercial or other losses directly or indirectly arising out of or related to our Terms; the Privacy and Transparency Statement; any service of tgtcoins.com; the use of tgtcoins.com; the use of tgt tokens; any use of your digital assets or digital currency on tgtcoins.com by any other party not authorized by you (all of the foregoing items shall be referred to herein as «Losses»).

Specific claims of a specialty or expertise in Social Security Claiming Strategies and «comprehensive» retirement income planning should be supported independently by other means including professional work experience, tenure and / or specific job duties and job title granted by an employer.

Under the proposed agreement, each worker's claim would be paid according to a formula that factors in the number of weeks each employee worked, among other things.

Now, none other than the controversial academic Stanley Fish claims that doctors and nurses who don't wish to take human life as part of their medical work should just get over it.

No Woman, lives with a bunch of other feminine men in «groups», and hangs around with his brow beating mother who claims she is a virgin because his dad liked to work with other men's wood, but apparently couldn't use his own with the ladies.

If all of that water was contained inside the Earth (as many Christian «claim» is the case when they get desperate because the other options clearly don't work), then you wouldn't have been able to walk on the surface because the Earth's crust would have turned into a literal quicksand soup.

If this is your level of understanding of how Science works — it would explain why you might think other claims about Gods existing as being evidence.

I now want to deepen that with the claim that openness to the other is the working of Christ within us.

I am told to believe in the words of His book though this work could be of others claiming to write for Him.

The claim of my nonpacifist colleagues that the system they are using is more socially responsible, more understandable to ordinary people, more culturally accessible to people of other value communities, more able to manage with discrimination the factual data of political decisions, than is my testimony to Jesus» words and work, still has the burden of proof.

The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.

When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?

Richard Bernstein calls this approach pluralistic: not a «flabby» pluralism, where we simply accept a variety of perspectives, vocabularies, paradigms, and language games, each on an equal footing; nor a «fortress - like» pluralism, where disparate groups work out of isolated frameworks and there is no communication between them; but rather an «engaged pluralism» where we acknowledge our fallibility and try to be responsive to the claims of others.

The general position of these writers, whose contributions vary considerably in approach and quality, is that Jesus made no claim of divinity for himself and that the doctrine of the incarnation was developed during the early centuries of the Christian era as an attempt to express the uniqueness of Jesus in the mythological language and thought forms of the Greek culture of the time.While recognizing the validity of the patristic theologians» work, which culminated in the classical christological definitions of Nicea and Chalcedon, the British theologians question whether these definitions are intelligible in the 20th century, and go on to suggest that some concept other than incarnation might better express the divine significance of Jesus today.

When he wrote to the Corinthians claiming to be their father in the faith in contrast to «countless guides in Christ,» he was functioning through the letters precisely as a guide to improve on the work of other guides.

These and other less central activities of the ministry of all periods are carried on by the pastoral director, but the work that lays the greatest claim to his time and thought is the care of a church, the administration of a community that is directed toward the whole purpose of the Church, namely, the increase among men of the love of God and neighbor; for the Church is becoming the minister and its «minister» is its servant, directing it in its service.

Here, and in other egalitarian literature, principle is given priority over application; admonition is given preference over description.34 What is dangerous in such a procedure, though it admittedly works in many cases, is the implied epistemological claim that objective, impersonal statements are of a somehow higher order of trustworthiness than the more personal and relational aspects of Scripture.

(1) self - renunciation — to work for others by giving up personal claims to happiness; (2) intercessory prayer; and (3) «the mutual granting of forgiveness of sins in God's name.

Edgar S. Brightman, who had himself been working for many years on the development of a nontraditional view of God, rejected Hartshorne's panentheism but praised other aspects of his view of God.35 Reinhold Niebuhr wrote a brief but very sympathetic review, 36 and John Bennett claimed that Hartshorne's was perhaps the best hypothesis about God available to contemporary theology.37 D. C. Macintosh found the book «exceptionally penetrating, stimulating, and instructive,» but by accusing Hartshorne of being too rationalistic he touched on what has been one of the major differences between Hartshorne and most other Whiteheadian theologians.38

One way, certainly, of making the claim for the extraordinary significance of Hartshorne's work for Christian theology is to say that he has done more than any other thinker on the scene to clarify, if not to solve, the problems raised by both parts of this assertion.

My kids are forced to say «under god» every morning... you can't run for office without spouting god every five minutes... religious people assume you are a believer... at work you can get in trouble if you «admit» you laugh at religion... and even this weeks tragedy has been nothing but offering of pointless «prayers», claims to «gods will» and other religious lunacy...

Of no other work on pastoral care can such a claim be made.

If Judge Bork's claim is admitted, then all the Court's «departures from the Constitution» (his phrase), all the cultural upheavals worked by the Court and deplored by him and by the other contributors to your November symposium, are an abuse of lawful authority, not an exercise of arrogated authority....

To point out the unrecognized similarity of Leclerc's «new» proposals of 1972 and the position espoused by Hartshorne at least since 1936 is, on the one hand, to claim originality for Hartshorne and, on the other, to indicate that the independent and thorough work of Leclerc adds to the credibility of Hartshorne's speculations.

Again and again in reading the works of these and other critics of the role of technology in the contemporary world, one comes upon the claim that at the core of the modern dilemma is the association of scientific and technological rationality with power, control, and domination — where these are seen as operative both in the natural and social realms.

This claim neglects the extent to which it is possible to associate and work with others without necessarily sharing all their concerns; in other words, it fails to do justice either to the variety to be found within the unity of modern Christianity or to that within the early Church.

If any other group did that, Christians would claim it is the work of Satan.

In his first book, entitled The Philosophy and Psychology of Sensation, Hartshorne announces his agreement with the Whiteheadian idea that the materials of all nature are events composed of aesthetic feeling,» claiming the additional support of modern physics for the contention; and he has never wavered in this conviction.17 Moreover, he also expounds in this work the further Whiteheadian notion, which he tirelessly repeats in his later works, that what the Constituent experiences or feelings of the universe experience are other experiences.

Wounded as it has been by the absolutist claims of 20th - century totalitarianism, contemporary consensus demotes truth — on the one hand to something purely subjective (signifying fidelity solely to one's own sentiments and often offending against the principle of non-contradiction), on the other to the merely convenient (namely, to «what works»).

Whatever verifiable evidence you can claim about how the exercise program worked for others, you have NO evidence about how it'll work for you.

On the other hand, it would be overly simple to claim the Hebrew Scriptures in support of our modern study of animal life or the work of environmental conservation, since it is clear that neither priest not prophet thought the order of nature as we now see it to reflect God's intentions, either original or ultimate, for it.

For many people, growth work in life's second half involves claiming the neglected resources in their «other side,» their anima or animus, and developing whichever of their four psychic functions have been neglected earlier.

I was under the impression his writings were done while he was alive... and there are many more but you are too daft to accept any authors own works which you might expect from the guy who others claimed was the son of the creator of he universe in a time when they had in fact already invented writing...

In a more recent work, American Catholic Biblical Scholarship: A History From the Early Republic to Vatican II, Fogarty offers, among other things, a useful antidote to the claims of some Catholic «restorationists» that the anti-Modernist excesses of the early twentieth century were the invention of fevered post-Vatican II liberal imaginations.