For
others commenting on the thread, knowledge of the product and believable enthusiasm was what stood out.
If you read some of
the other comments on this thread, it isn't uncommon for dad to sleep in a separate bed or room.
Not exact matches
Looking back at the different
comment threads on this article the usual banter has atheists and Christians exchanging angry and and mean
comments at each
other.
Other than that, the vast majority of my comments on this thread have been directed at other pe
Other than that, the vast majority of my
comments on this
thread have been directed at
other pe
other people.
I actually agree with your original point, but this
thread has deviated so far away from your original idea and has become defamatory to
others that I had to
comment on the matter at hand.
Take 10 minutes from patting yourself
on the back and take a look at my blog / websites, and / or my
comments on other threads here, and you'll be quickly disabused of the notion that I treat the Scriptures «as though they are written directly to 20th Century A.D. Americans» (For what it's worth, I'm not American, so why would I do such a thing).
Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's posting much
on this
thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within
other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a
comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.
that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas
on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas
on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000
comments on this
thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see
on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince
others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or
other similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....
Reading the
thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to
other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the
comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.
that's what it sounds like if you read
comments here, and it makes me laugh because I've seen nearly identical
threads about the same people
on other team's sites.
Others on this
thread have shot his foolish
comments down and so will I as follows: Sam, my deluded fellow Gooner, the whole point is that Wenger must go NOW.
For the prior 1.5 years
on TLT, people managed to disagree with each
other without resorting to any kind of harsh language, but due to that controversy, suddenly these
comment threads became a very unpleasant place to be.
Someone
commented on Dr. Amy's
other Ina
thread that what Ina was writing about is A-OK as long as the mother consents.
Any future
comments on this
thread that do not show respect towards myself and
other commenters will be deleted, and the commenter will be blocked from
commenting on this blog in the future.
Justin, I don't find C - list and prouds
comment on this particular
thread any more snide and uncalled for then those made by several
others.
And the
thread of an online conversation — whether it sticks to the original topic or users
comment on each
other's
comments — can be modeled as a tree with discussions veering off
on branches, researchers report online November 2 at arXiv.org.
I posted a
comment on the
other thread.
Comments Off
on Films I loved in February 2018
Other Tagged: A Fantastic Woman, Greta Gerwig, John Trengove, Lady Bird, Paul Thomas Anderson, Phantom
Thread, Sebastián Lelio, The Wound Permalink Posted by Thomas Caldwell
Teachers can begin there,
commenting on others»
threads and creating their own practice
threads.
David Gaughran addresses some of these possible imbalances (also
commented about
on this
thread by
other folk):
the good thing was, you could name a movie / tv that virtually everyone else had long forgotten about, and there the page would be, with a message board to use for it... meant you could read
other comments / questions by people, even if there were very few
threads on the show / person because of their obscurity..
Comment on threads, take some time to read books written by
other members and help them out where you can.
This sounds a great deal like the practical
comments from
others on this
thread.
At the time of writing I haven't had much chance to get online so I won't
comment much
on these aspects
other than you can play any of the modes available in singleplayer such as Cage Match, Extreme Rules, Tornado Tag Team (four players) and Triple
Thread matches.
To discuss this update's new tweaks / features with
other backers make sure to leave us a
comment on the official forum
thread.
@Fran Barlow: I implore you to re-post
comment # 163 with some more editing, if not
on this
thread then in some
other high - profile venue.
[Dec. 11, 1:21 p.m. Updated The
comment thread on this post is to become an open discussion of developments in basic climate science, as described in a new piece aimed at keeping
other discussions here
on target.]
(I'll be posting more thoughts
on the future of the climate panel that I received from climate scientists and
others working in this area in the
comment thread below.)
How, in a
comments thread or blog post, can I or anyone else «provide» evidence
on global warming
other than by pointing to it.
We frequently take part in discussions
on comment threads and
other web forums, arguing for the use of software to improve reproducibility in climate science, and for greater clarity in science software broadly, and for the release of more climate science software.
Others interested in the futile discussion with AK may like to see the
comments on this
thread, where AK ended up simply posting silly pictures, like this: http://judithcurry.com/2015/01/24/week-in-review-40/#comment-668596.
Concerning these R2 figures, I'm about to reply to Greg about CO2 fitting, which you can find by searching for xyzzy in a
comment by me
on this
thread other than this one.
[TD] Your
comments are most appropriate
on several
other threads.
Looking over some of the
comments on this
thread is occurred to me we may see a two tracked approach, which of course is a simplification because there are many
other tracks.
Please note, that after Roger rejected that
comment (w / o even posting it in his «rejected
comments»
thread), he has gone
on to continue to take impugn the integrity of
others even as he decries name - calling.
Richard, I give you this quote from your
comment on the Christmas
thread at December 29, 2012 at 10:50 am, talking about rgbatduke: «And, as do most atheists, he fails to recognise that his religion is as faith - based as any
other: agnosticism rejects faith but belief that no deity exists (i.e.atheism) is a religious faith of identical kind to belief in the existence of one or more deities (i.e. theism).»
Update There's a response at Catallaxy, with a lengthy (and typically Catallaxian)
comments thread, largely focusing
on my offhand reference to Bolt and
others as Australian advocates of anti-science views imported from the US.
If you look back over some of my
comments,
on other threads and blogs, you will see I use all I can find.
This is not an ad hom attack
on Robert, he has offered plenty of evidence of what I have stated within the confines of this
thread alone, let alone the many
other threads he has
commented on here at Climate etc... over the last couple months.
I made a
comment on the
other thread which I partially repeat below as it is relevant.
I have read all the
comments that have been presented
on this
thread as well as
other threads.
Now it seems (
on other threads) N.O. is about to implode (as many trolls do) and Joanne Nova is having to deal with his rude aggressive
comments.
Hint: keep things
on misconduct proceedings and don't forget about the Open
Thread # 7 for
other climate science
comments.
As I mentioned before, I (and, it seems,
others) have attempted to discuss post
comments on the
thread, but my
comment was not passed through moderation.
Gary, please withdraw your untrue allegation made
on the
other thread that I had altered
comments to make you look foolish.
RE: Banned vs
threaded «Threaded» is simply a nice way of saying Curtin was «banned from commenting on anything other than the thread that Lambert started to amuse his regular commenters» — the ones who enjoy seeing Curtin writhe but can't stomach all the crap that Curtin puts in the way of useful discussion on pretty much any topic he comm
threaded «
Threaded» is simply a nice way of saying Curtin was «banned from commenting on anything other than the thread that Lambert started to amuse his regular commenters» — the ones who enjoy seeing Curtin writhe but can't stomach all the crap that Curtin puts in the way of useful discussion on pretty much any topic he comm
Threaded» is simply a nice way of saying Curtin was «banned from
commenting on anything
other than the
thread that Lambert started to amuse his regular commenters» — the ones who enjoy seeing Curtin writhe but can't stomach all the crap that Curtin puts in the way of useful discussion
on pretty much any topic he
comments on.
We both presented our bottom - line analyses
on another
comment thread the
other day.
at least if my last and polite
comment on that
other thread continues to get moderated out of existence.
To leave your
comment and read
other reactions, please go to the dedicated Discussion
Thread on the BNC Forums:
Thanks, Dave Springer for your very helpful expert
comments and useful links in this and
other topic
threads on WUWT.