It is very easy to influence
others opinions when there's only 400 in a sample.
Not exact matches
When your sense of pleasure and satisfaction are derived from the
opinions of
other people, you are no longer the master of your own happiness.
In his
opinion, the Carnegie courses, which are offered in more locations, are a better deal
when you factor travel into the hourly cost: $ 50 to $ 60 an hour for Carnegie's versus $ 70 to $ 80 for the
others, by Harmon's calculation.
Pincus and the four
other directors sold their stock in Zynga's April 2012 secondary stock offering at $ 12 per share, nearly double the stock's price
when the lockup eventually expired, according to Bouchard's 35 - page
opinion.
But, let's be honest: there are definitely times
when you've already made up your mind and just go through the motions of asking for
other opinions.
There are times
when it's good to get the
opinions of
others, but you don't need constant accolades from everyone around you.
When visiting leading figures from Europe, there were discussions that the U.S. and Europe met eye - to - eye on, like fighting the so - called Islamic State, while
other issues revealed divided
opinion including Russia and climate change.
As a byproduct, the
other person is more open to hear and consider your thoughts and
opinions — even
when they disagree with them.
When you assume others are interesting, you don't dismiss their thoughts or opinions as wrong, or strange (even when everyone else do
When you assume
others are interesting, you don't dismiss their thoughts or
opinions as wrong, or strange (even
when everyone else do
when everyone else does).
And
when the phone rang, most callees were happy to give a few minutes of their time and their
opinions to the person on the
other end of the line.
«Nor do I intend to share my private
opinion other than via the anonymity of [the] ballot box
when I join millions of
others to cast my vote,» Carney continued.
They aren't afraid to voice their
opinions and alert
others when customer service, product quality or an employment opportunity is unjustifiably poor.
They like putting their
opinions out there to see if they hold up because they learn a lot from the times they are wrong and
other people learn from them
when they're right.
At this point in the industry, additional attorney's and
other professional
opinions are also less valuable
when there have been hundreds and thousands of attorneys and
other professionals
opinions from both sides that have crafted the lease contract!
When family members can unite around common values and vision and learn to appreciate each
other's individual
opinions and interests, having hard conversations and approaching generational transition become easier.
At the risk of writing something cohesive, I'm just going to ramble a little here with some thoughts on GDP and the whole recession debate... these
opinions and typos are strictly my own, except
when I'm referencing
other people's
opinions, which I probably agree with.
The minimum account level deposit is much higher than a lot of
other websites have but
when you factor in all the extra services it is still a very good deal in our
opinion.
Often relying too much on
others when making financial decisions, they can be too easily convinced by those with strong
opinions.
When asked his
opinion of Taunton before a public debate, Hitchens said, «If everyone in the United States had the same qualities of loyalty and care and concern for
others that Larry Taunton had, we'd be living in a much better society than we do.»
I hate
when closed minded people in authority try to make
others feel small because they have a differing
opinion.
Even
when your
opinion is that you think
others know better than you, you believe that you are correct in holding that
opinion, and you believe that
others are wrong if they disagree with that
opinion by ascribing more wisdom to you than you think you deserve.
When you structure your differences of
opinion in such a vulgar manner, you give power and credence to the
other side.
This morning I wrote in my journal, «I am so bogged down by the
opinions of
others that
when I wonder about my beliefs about God, I think about what
others think I should believe.»
It just seems that people like Hawking ignore religion completely
when a HUGE part of science is questioning all beliefs including your own which I don't think human beings do as much as they should, or respect
other people's
opinions.
When it comes to what
other people do, do we seriously think they care about our
opinions?
It simplifies things
when we can write - off the thoughts and
opinions of
other people by assuming they've taken the easy way out, that they're just trying to be popular and liked.
I am open to seeing sourcing on the subject and think it would be interesting, but spouting off a single man's
opinion is not verifiable fact
when others have stated against such truths.
I am repeating some of what
others have already said in this blog but also including scripture which I think is always important
when we voice an
opinion based on God's word.
A far worse fate, arguably, is the torrent of abuse thrown at you
when you happen to express on social media an
opinion other people find offensive.
To recap — you object
when, in your
opinion,
others twist what the bible says.
Some parishes have great priests
when it comes to welcoming people with distinct own
opinions and sometimes
other parishes don't.
You have the right to your
opinion even if it is wrong (and I'm not saying it is) but
when you start imposing that
opinion on
others it becomes a problem.
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your
opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water
when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that
when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin
when you're with your significant
other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you
when you're with your significant
other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate
when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
When others despise, defy, or destroy this right and bully those who protect it, it betrays their desire to control the narrative, and this, in my
opinion, betrays their desire to protect their own privileges of power.
Spew and hate, read the same article you did I don't recall Mr Cathy using those words it sounds like you are the one ready to use those words
when you don't like what you hear, as for the
other I did misspell and I do understand that officials are the ones ready to discriminate against those whoever they are were elected to serve with their own
opinion.
The conference reinforced the high
opinion of the Pope who,
when visiting Croatia earlier in 2011, stated that Father Boskovic «is a good illustration of the happy symbiosis of faith and scholarship, each stimulating the
other through research that is at the same time open, diversified and capable of synthesis.
When we have allowed us to have our free
opinions, we also accept the
opinions of
others and thus we see no reason for calling them bad names.
I think things get hot
when we try to pin each
other down as to what we are basing our
opinions on - faith, evidence, intuition, the Bible, etc., etc., experiences.
Nevertheless, I believe it is inaccurate for Calvinists to attempt to appropriate the words «grace» and «reformed» for their own system of theology, especially
when, in my
opinion, many Calvinists know less of grace than their opponents, and numerous
others have stopped seeking further theological reformation.
That's
when someone believes in the general existence of God (s), but doesn't have much of an
opinion of them and doesn't actively follow any because they just * don't care * one way or the
other.
«But
when a modern thinker like Auguste Comte wondered why,
when we do not allow freedom of
opinion in mathematics, we should allow it in morals and politics, his very question shocked J. S. Mill and
other liberals.»
When in the course of human events something new is launched, a decent respect for the
opinion of
others calls for a word of explanation.
Jellinek put his finger on this problem
when he declared: «Generally, it may be said not only of the public at large but of the medical profession, industry and labor and all the
other sections of public
opinion, that their feeling is that the idea that «alcoholism» is an illness «is true, but not really true.»»
Why should your
opinion hold sway
when the rights of
others are affected by it?
It should not be necessary to limit the freedom of individuals or groups to express
opinions except
when they could cause grave harm to
others or a threat to public order.
«They sit with their arms folded the whole time, leave during the altar call, criticize the pastor, snort
when other people state their
opinions and never create lasting bonds of friendship.
I think much more needs to be researched on this question, but if she actually perpetuated or failed to alleviate the suffering of
others when she had the means to do so, in the name of a twisted view of the religious value of suffering, she is very much in reproach in my
opinion.
That's both irritating, and demonstrates poor communication skills (and a disregard for
others»
opinions when they differ from your own).
Research indicates that
when opinions, attitudes, or behavior do shift under the impact of communications, they tend to regress to the preexisting position unless they are reinforced by events,
other communications, or group pressures.
I can't think of any
other group of Americans who are more objective and well - informed
when they express an
opinion.