Not exact matches
The way of
distinction, therefore, puts a positive valuation on the time - space continuum and, though it
sees divine redemption as the remaking of history into something new, it can not conceive of divine - human interaction in
other than historical terms which preserve the qualitative difference between God and man.
He is, rather, a very complex structured society which sustains, among many
other societies, a regnant, personally ordered, subordinate society (an enduring object) which Whitehead refers to as «the soul of which Plato spoke» (Adventures of Ideas 267 —
see also pp. 263 - 264 for a clear statement of the
distinction between «the ordinary meaning of the term «man,» which includes the total bodily man, and the narrow sense of «man,» where «man» is considered a person in Whitehead's technical sense, i.e., as the regnant, personally ordered society which he identifies as his equivalent of Descartes» thinking substance and Plato's soul).
Scholars make
distinctions where
others do not
see any
distinctions.
Thus, we can
see that and how Ogden's critical appropriation of Whitehead's comprehensive empiricism as a hermeneutical grid for presenting in first - order fashion the content of experience as a sense of worth that requires the threefold
distinction of self,
other, and whole in order to describe it both is informed by and illustrates his second - order analysis.
(The ethical
distinctions, for example, between drinking as a part of a relaxed evening at home and drinking prior to operating a car or
other piece of potentially lethal machinery, need to be
seen clearly by a young person.)
It
sees no
distinction in adding story to story, upon the monuments of fame erected to the memory of
others.
The absence of prediction is a major point of
distinction between metaphysical and scientific models, but in
other features Ferré
sees considerable similarity:
In
other words, shrews are the «motors,» rather than the «sensories,» (As to this
distinction,
see the admirably practical account in J.M. Baldwin's little book, The Story of the Mind, 1898.)
The Pragmatist version of this tends to
see no
other intelligibility in such objects than their practical potentialities for us, famously collapsing the «fact — value»
distinction.
In the relational view, as we have
seen, there is no absolute
distinction between the self and the
other.
If the sex
distinction was indeed hardwired, then the researchers should have
seen the separate activation of the groups of neurons specific for recognizing males versus females, even during the first encounters between these naïve mice and
other male or female intruder mice.
But he
sees an important
distinction between rabbits and
other animals.
It's important to make the
distinction between regular commercial grain - fed meats that you'll
see at most grocery stores and true grass - fed meats (beef, bison, etc) from animals that were allowed to forage for their natural diet instead of force - fed corn, soy, and
other grains.
The end of the film features a «battle royale» between the motley array of mostly no - name costumed good guys and costumed bad guys, which begs the question as to how most of these characters who are
seeing each
other for the first time can draw the
distinction between them to make sure they are only fighting nemeses on the
other side of the law.
Others are incapable (perhaps willfully so) of
seeing any
distinction between «national» and «federal», though we seem to have no difficulty making that
distinction elsewhere in education.
It was a «natural consequence of this state of things,» one doctor from the era wrote,
seeing that «very few persons entitled by birth or
other advantageous circumstances... would condescend to study, much less engage in the practice of medicine,» thus «poor and ambitious young men from the provinces were induced to repair to Paris and enter upon the study of the only profession through which they could expect to obtain
distinction and worldly prosperity.»
This being the Financial Independence blog housed at MoneySense.ca, I was happy to
see at least one
other author making the same
distinction: financial planner David Christianson recently published a book titled Managing the Bull under Evelyn Jacks» book publishing division, Knowledge Bureau Newsbooks.
Foliage can look flat and the snow courses lack the
distinction seen in
other stages.
As the press release states, «In Praise of Rust features paintings of old vehicles
seen on the streets of New York — primarily vans and commercial delivery trucks — covered in graffiti, rust, scratches, scuffs, dents and
other marks of
distinction.»
In
other words, I'm more interested in taking away those
distinctions we
see between good «resistant» and bad «complicit» culture, and
seeing what larger ideas or historical currents are common to them.
There seems to be a common assumption (
see, among many
others, here 3.6, here or here at 14:00) that there is a
distinction between two kinds of «post-Brexit agreements», i.e. the withdrawal agreement (the divorce settlement) and the agreement regarding the future relationship between the United Kingdom (UK) and the European Union (EU).
One
distinction that the law's defenders now raise, however, is that
other alternatives to partial - birth abortion exist (
see, summary in NYT article of 11/9/06, Justices Hear Argument on Late Term Abortion).