Not exact matches
While Linux
fights might have broken
out over engineering approaches, and early bitcoin debates revolved around ideology and theory, Garzik thinks
something much less abstract is driving bitcoin's current unrest: money.
All these sore Core «bcash» name calling IDIOTS are exactly that... IDIOTS, it sickens me so much to see these morons deliberately
fight against
something that is beneficial for the whole world (people in it), to get rid of the corrupt and utter scam that private central bankers created, surely Blockstream and bankers must have hired these people to spend all day long harassing Bitcoin Cash supporters, putting
out and repeating same shit propaganda
over and
over, so to get unaware people fall for it, and to trick them into thinking that they centralised Lightning network is scaling of Bitcoin... which is complete horse shit, and could not further from the truth.
I think she deserves some amount of criticism for nearly pulling
out of a
fight over something that did little else other than «shake her up»
From the
fight that libraries are still facing
over ebook lending to the snail's pace of digital textbook adoption, as well as the realization from booksellers that they will have to do
something to accommodate ebooks if they plan to keep their doors open with big box and online bookstores breathing down their necks, it often feels like the industry as a whole would like to look the other way and let digital reading burn itself
out.
The other 10 % of the time they start
fighting over what seems like position to smell
something, or get
out a door, or once to get to me.
Something I feel that helps
out the Dynasty Warriors games as some levels can feel a little monotonous by
fighting the same enemies
over several maps.
The next failure to compromise came in the
fight over adding a «safety valve» provision to limit unanticipated high costs from greenhouse gas restrictions,
something Joe Romm and many others rejected
out of hand at the time, even though Romm last year (around minute 37 in this videotaped panel discussion) noted the need for pragmatism to get things started: «The game changer for the world isn't between no price for carbon and a high price.
(The teacher pointed
out that when «
fights or arguments
over something on Twitter, or Instagram, or just how their day went and having a bad day and somebody just reacts to them wrong,» having a gun in the classroom is the last thing you want.)
It is
something we all can do, whether the argument is a recurring
fight that keeps happening
over the course of 20 years or a one - off dispute that emerges
out of nowhere one day at the breakfast table.
However, couples often disagree
over pets, and
fighting this
out in court is
something to be prepared for.