One group, New Yorkers Against Corruption, has begun questioning the cost of a convention — estimated in the tens of millions of dollars — whether delegates would be the same political insiders who pull levers at the Capitol and just what amendments could come
out of a convention process.
Not exact matches
amending the
Convention to include the principles
of subsidiarity and the margin
of appreciation; amending the
Convention to tighten the admissibility criteria - so that trivial cases can be thrown
out and the focus
of the Court can be serious abuses; reducing the time limit for claims from six months to four improving the selection
process for judges; setting
out a roadmap for further reform.
But to facilitate this
process and consistent with the
conventions set
out in the draft Cabinet Manual, I have asked the Cabinet Secretary to arrange for the civil service to provide support on request to parties engaged in discussions on the formation
of government.
Prior to the Democrats
convention at the Westchester County Center on Tuesday night, all
of the other candidates had dropped
out of the race, including Yonkers Mayor Mike Spano who left the running a week before the nomination
process.
After he defeated Teachout at the Working Families Party
convention in May, Cuomo had a brusque assessment
of the drawn -
out process and those who claimed damage to his narrative or brand.
While the vote on whether to hold a
convention is Tuesday, the
process could play
out over a couple
of years.
A learning culture is an accumulation
of organizational values, practices,
conventions, and
processes that are laid
out for the development...
Relying on the words
of the delegates themselves to explore the
Convention's sharp conflicts and hard bargaining, David O. Stewart lays
out the passions and contradictions
of the often painful
process of writing the Constitution.
«(3) The Administrator may decrease the frequency
of review and revision under paragraph (1) if the Administrator determines that such decrease is appropriate in order to synchronize such review and revision with any similar review
process carried
out pursuant to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change, done at New York on May 9, 1992, or to an agreement negotiated under that convention, except that in no event shall the Administrator carry out such review and revision any less frequently than every
Convention on Climate Change, done at New York on May 9, 1992, or to an agreement negotiated under that
convention, except that in no event shall the Administrator carry out such review and revision any less frequently than every
convention, except that in no event shall the Administrator carry
out such review and revision any less frequently than every 10 years.
Article 76
of the
Convention sets
out a
process for states to determine the limits
of this «extended» continental shelf and gain international recognition for those limits.
Since then, events have told a rather different story, with the U.S. waging a multi-front campaign — organizing a global network
of bilateral agreements designed to render the U.N. climate
process «irrelevant», sending
out its flacks to argue that fossil technologies like «clean coal» and carbon capture are the best ways forward, insisting that the under - funded climate secretariat separate its Kyoto Protocol accounts from those related to the Framework
Convention, ruthlessly undermining all attempts to talk about, or even talk about talking about, the future
of the regime.
As Russia has opted
out of allowing service by post under the
Convention, service is effected by the often painfully slow
process of the English Court sending a request for service to the Russian Ministry
of Justice, which then sends the English proceedings to the relevant court in the area where the defendant officially resides.
If, further on along the
process, Art 5 (right to liberty)
of the European
Convention on Human Rights has been found to have been contravened, that could change, but it would be unwise for anyone to book the Ritz for their coming
out party just yet.
Further, the Court (this was a Grand Chamber judgment) points
out that the award still has to go through the national court's standard recognition and enforcement
process, outside the framework
of Title III
of the Regulation, instead governed by national residual law as well as the New York
Convention.