Not exact matches
Jenkins wrote on Twitter that Germany's shift in
energy policy was misguided and resulted effectively in
fossil fuels replacing much
of the missing nuclear power — a pattern that's playing
out at home, as well.
The final agreement involves several legally binding clauses, with trillions
of dollars dedicated to reducing the dependence on
fossil fuels within many countries, and to rolling
out a huge expansion
of renewable
energy.
After his departure, China said it plans to accelerate the use
of alternative -
energy cars, phasing
out sales
of fossil -
fuel vehicles and turning the province into a free - trade port.
When
fossil fuels run
out we shall have invented ways
of using the
energy of the sun to drive our industries.
When we clear forests, we're not only knocking
out our best ally in capturing the staggering amount
of GHGs we humans create (which we do primarily by burning
fossil fuels at
energy facilities, and
of course, in cars, planes, and trains).
Turns
out, $ 750 million worth
of State money is going to SolarCity to build solar panels, which will presumably be in high demand as the nation transfers away from
fossil fuels and towards renewable
energy sources.
He's in favor
of opting
out of the Common Core state learning standards, banning hydrofracking and converting the state's
fossil fuel infrastructure to «green» sources
of energy like solar.
My campaign is calling for 100 % Clean
Energy in New York by 2030, including a complete ban on fracking, a phase out of all nuclear plants, no new fossil fuel infrastructure, and the rapid development of a clean energy system based on distributed renewable energy production from solar, wind, and water resources and an interactive smart
Energy in New York by 2030, including a complete ban on fracking, a phase
out of all nuclear plants, no new
fossil fuel infrastructure, and the rapid development
of a clean
energy system based on distributed renewable energy production from solar, wind, and water resources and an interactive smart
energy system based on distributed renewable
energy production from solar, wind, and water resources and an interactive smart
energy production from solar, wind, and water resources and an interactive smart grid.
He was speaking ahead
of Wednesday's Second Reading
of the
Energy Bill, where he wants targets to phase
out fossil fuels and to decarbonise electricity generation.
Building
out the full renewable
energy system in New York in the next 15 years will create 4.5 million jobs while lowering electric rates to half
of what
fossil and nuclear
fuels will cost in the next decade, according to a recent study by Cornell and Stanford researchers.
Environmental Advocates
of New York says the Cuomo team deserves credit for its aggressive State
Energy Plan, but cautions the goals may be just
out of reach should the state go the way
of re-firing outdated
fossil fuel plants and raiding carbon abatement programs like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
They support the phasing
out of fossil fuel subsidies in the «medium term» and pledge a huge boost to renewable
energy, including through a new $ 2 billion «Low Carbon Economy Trust» to fund clean
energy projects.
To work
out the economic benefits and costs
of switching to clean
energy, the team estimated how much air pollution would fall if
fossil fuel use was slashed.
But by putting the targets into law and mandating a set
of regulations — including requiring 35 percent
of the country's electricity to come from clean sources by 2024; establishing a voluntary carbon market; developing incentives to promote renewable
energy; phasing
out fossil fuel subsidies; and forcing companies in the largest carbon polluting sectors to report their emissions — they said the results could be groundbreaking.
But as Kurt E. Yeager, former president
of the Electric Power Research Institute in Palo Alto, Calif., points
out, such standards «aren't worth the paper they're written on until we have a power system, a grid, that is capable
of assimilating that intermittent
energy without having to build large quantities
of backup power,
fossil -
fueled, to enable it.»
Implementing key policies and investments in those three systems — from phasing
out fossil fuels to stopping deforestation to ramping up
energy efficiency — could deliver at least half
of the emissions cuts needed by 2030 to lower the risk
of dangerous climate change, said Jeremy Oppenheim, the report's program director.
Despite the renewables building boom, such geothermal, wind and solar projects still do not crowd
out fossil fuel — fired generation in the
energy mix
of, for example, the utility Pacific Gas & Electric.
Global
energy - related emissions could peak by 2020 if
energy efficiency is improved; the construction
of inefficient coal plants is banned; investment in renewables is increased to $ 400 billion in 2030 from $ 270 billion in 2014; methane emissions are cut in oil and gas production and
fossil fuel subsidies are phased
out by 2030.
-- The Secretary shall carry
out a program to establish
Energy Innovation Hubs to enhance the Nation's economic, environmental, and energy security by promoting commercial application of clean, indigenous energy alternatives to oil and other fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and ensuring that the United States maintains a technological lead in the development and commercial application of state - of - the - art energy technol
Energy Innovation Hubs to enhance the Nation's economic, environmental, and
energy security by promoting commercial application of clean, indigenous energy alternatives to oil and other fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and ensuring that the United States maintains a technological lead in the development and commercial application of state - of - the - art energy technol
energy security by promoting commercial application
of clean, indigenous
energy alternatives to oil and other fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and ensuring that the United States maintains a technological lead in the development and commercial application of state - of - the - art energy technol
energy alternatives to oil and other
fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and ensuring that the United States maintains a technological lead in the development and commercial application
of state -
of - the - art
energy technol
energy technologies.
The World
Energy Outlook 2016, released last week, is just one among an increasing line
of studies showing how nations need to slow and, ultimately, phase
out investment in new
fossil fuel supply infrastructure — from oil fields and pipelines to coal mines — if they are serious about keeping warming to 2C or less.
In 1997, Tickell set
out on the road with a biodiesel powered «Veggie Van» and a video camera and began filming what would eventually become known as
FUEL, the 2008 Sundance Audience Award winning documentary film that investigates the possible replacement
of fossil fuels with renewable
energy.
On one side are the world's industrialized nations, which largely built their wealth through a century
of fossil -
fuel combustion; on the other, those seeking a path
out of poverty that, for the moment, has to depend on the same
energy sources, and in many cases also on clearing forests.
For ethanol there is in deed a big question here, but the DOE study on biodiesel claims that you get 3.5 units
of biodiesel
energy out for each unit
of fossil fuel energy you put in; with better technology and crops, it can ge better.
The incident illustrates the importance
of sweating the details if your goal is to build societal support for the grand challenge
of getting
out of our
fossil -
fueled comfort zone and de-carbonizing the fast - growing global
energy system.
First let's get the blindingly obvious
out of the way:
energy does not have to come from
fossil fuels.
That solution is to rapidly phase
out fossil fuels and replace them with non-carbon sources
of energy, use that
energy with maximum efficiency, and use organic agriculture and reforestation to to draw down the already dangerous anthropogenic excess
of atmospheric CO2.
Energy Policy, the journal that recently published a paper laying
out an ambitious plan to end
fossil fuel use in New York State within a few decades, has now published a short critique by four researchers in the Department
of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University.
As news spread over the weekend
of the death
of George P. Mitchell, the 94 - year - old Texas oil man widely credited with playing a pivotal role in unlocking the shale
energy era, I reached
out for a reaction from Daniel Yergin, the Pulitzer - winning chronicler
of humanity's
fossil fuel era.
This is a red herring, put
out there by defenders
of fossil fuel based
energy.
Is there reason to think that this time — even with the added prod for new
energy policies from the ongoing gulf oil disaster — that Americans will get
out of the
fossil -
fueled comfort zone?
If only that much people (one
out of ten) could manage to have a really decent life, yet, with (and historically only once was) «easy»
fossil fuel energy source available, is it reasonable to expect that 10 times more people will manage to do so in future without that exceptional source
of energy and much less «easy» renewable
energy sources?
March 13, 12:43 p.m. Relevant tweets appended A group
of scientists and
energy analysts has laid
out a path under which New York State could, in theory, eliminate its use
of fossil fuels and nuclear power — including for transportation — by 2050.
Do we choose materials that take a lot
of energy and
fossil fuels to make and put
out tons
of CO2 in a massive hit right now, or do we strive to generate as little as possible and treat it as a loan we pay back?
I reached
out to Pierrehumbert because he is one
of many authors
of «Consequences
of twenty - first - century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea - level change,» an important new Nature Climate Change analysis reinforcing past work showing a very, very, very long impact (tens
of millenniums) on the Earth system — climatic, coastal and otherwise — from the carbon dioxide buildup driven by the conversion, in our lifetimes,
of vast amounts
of fossil fuels into useful
energy.
Second, if divestment were to reduce the financial resources
of coal, oil, and gas companies (which it would NOT do), this would only reduce research and development at those same companies
of: carbon capture and storage technologies; other key technological breakthroughs; and renewable sources
of energy (the
fossil fuel companies are carrying
out much
of the R&D on renewables).
Since when did any part
of the scientific community rule
out GEOTERHMAL
energy as the main replacement for
fossil fuels?
«It turns
out, to get on a trajectory to hit 450 ppm, we're going to need to turn off most
of our
fossil fuel energy, end deforestation, and build about 11.5 new terawatts
of clean
energy capacity by 2033 (30 years
out from the 2003 baseline).»
The two scientists have already reported on the increasing costs
of delay in phasing
out fossil fuel sources
of energy.
Of course, my favorite method for finding out the system of meanings in the lives of a cultural group is to simply say, «Fossil fuels are beneficial because they provide abundant and inexpensive energy for the most peopl
Of course, my favorite method for finding
out the system
of meanings in the lives of a cultural group is to simply say, «Fossil fuels are beneficial because they provide abundant and inexpensive energy for the most peopl
of meanings in the lives
of a cultural group is to simply say, «Fossil fuels are beneficial because they provide abundant and inexpensive energy for the most peopl
of a cultural group is to simply say, «
Fossil fuels are beneficial because they provide abundant and inexpensive
energy for the most people.
Point five addresses bringing people
out of poverty and calls for putting «an end to the
fossil fuel era, phasing
out fossil fuel emissions, including emissions from military aviation and shipping and providing affordable, reliable and safe renewable
energy access for all.»
With the additional
fossil fuel reserves we've figured
out how to exploit, we have some more time, unless we devolve backwards into the low
energy societies
of wind and sun power
of the 19th century.
Firstly, there's the simple fact that is uses a massive amount
of energy to function, and unless that
energy comes from a sustainable source you're likely adding to the number
of fossil fuels being burnt
out there.
11/19/17 — Despite its stated goal
of dramatically reducing carbon emissions by aggressively pursing clean
energy technologies and phasing
out fossil fuels, Germany is still burning lots
of an especially dirty form
of coal and is likely to badly miss its upcoming emission - reduction targets.
Bloomberg points
out that the Obama Administration is «facing mounting calls from conservationists to thwart new
fossil fuel development as part
of the «keep it in the ground» movement» — which Murkowski says is a «misguided» effort that «will harm local economies and threaten future
energy supplies.»
that «Human combustion
of fossil fuels is significantly causing that climate change» is also true, then many, perhaps most, people will accept that there is a need to «reduce greenhouse gas emissions and build
out clean
energy» even if it will «cost consumers money, decrease
energy security and destroy jobs».
In addition to the work in the World
Energy Outlook, the IEA has provided input to the G - 20 and APEC since 2009, when G20 leaders took a major step toward reforming energy subsidies and committed to «rationalize and phase out over the medium term inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption», the IEA has provided input to the G - 20 and APEC in support of their commit
Energy Outlook, the IEA has provided input to the G - 20 and APEC since 2009, when G20 leaders took a major step toward reforming
energy subsidies and committed to «rationalize and phase out over the medium term inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption», the IEA has provided input to the G - 20 and APEC in support of their commit
energy subsidies and committed to «rationalize and phase
out over the medium term inefficient
fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption», the IEA has provided input to the G - 20 and APEC in support
of their commitments.
If rejected, this would become the clearest case yet
of energy storage beating
out a
fossil fuel plant to serve grid reliability.
Since 2009, the IEA has actively contributed to all
energy work streams
of the G20 — a group that accounts for 85 %
of the global economy and 75 %
of global
energy demand — covering topics ranging from
energy security and market transparency, to
energy efficiency and the phase
out of fossil fuel subsidies.
Professor Kevin Anderson, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and the Teesside University said: «If the EU is to transform its
energy system to align with the Paris temperature and equity commitments, it can not continue with business as usual and must instead initiate a rapid phase
out of all
fossil fuels including natural gas.
The Australian government's
Energy White Paper [x] plans to facilitate the expansion
of fossil fuel mining and export industries at a time when they must be phased
out as fast as possible.