Sentences with phrase «out of an energy tax»

Not exact matches

Certainly the presidential hopefuls have expended a lot of energy on social issues, but they've also laid out plans on numerous topics critical to small - business owners, primarily in the areas of taxes, health care, wages, and immigration.

Economists agreed almost unanimously at a recent provincial economic summit that a consumption tax would help level out the peaks and valleys of provincial revenue tied to energy prices.

It's falling coal prices not token carbon taxes that will snuff out Prime Minister Abbott's coal - fired dreams of becoming an energy superpower.

She should speak out against the climate change denial rampant in opposition circles and talk about the benefits of the carbon tax, the transition to renewable energy and her government's investments in public services and infrastructure.

With the news out of the United States that they're energy industry is beginning to recover, it's clear that imposing additional costs to export industries drives investors to other jurisdictions that lack a carbon tax.

Gun control, higher taxes, poor education choices, energy ignorance, etc. simply put him out of the mainstream.

I guess I feel the same way about a liberal agenda that say that to get out of debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term abortions) or a government that confiscates kids lunches, or tells me how much soda I can drink, or uses my tax money to choose winners and losers (mostly losers but Obma doners) in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more coal and oil than any other nation on the planet.

The other is a man more conservative by nature but possessed of an unbounded need for grand display that has already led him to unconservative places even he is at a loss to explain, and that as president would leave him in constant search of the out - of - box experience — the confoundedly brilliant Nixon - to - China flipperoo regarding his fancy of the day, be it health care, taxes, energy, foreign policy, whatever.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

To make sure the dangerous radicalism of putting 5p on the top rate of tax was boxed in, he even ruled out renationalising energy companies and the rail.

He called out Teachout for her opposition to the property tax cap, which saved New Yorkers $ 4.5 billion in 2015; her support of an energy tax that would cost families more than $ 1,700 a year; her support of President Obama's disastrous Iran deal and her support for Hillary Clinton, despite calling her «corrupt.»

That includes items like ending the 18 - a energy tax, dealing with out - of - network health costs, and preventing another minimum wage increase.

Trump himself toured the state, headlining fund - raisers where he laid out a message that now sounds familiar: People were fleeing the state in droves; New York had become a laughingstock for the rest of the nation; Cuomo was lowering tolls merely because Trump was pressuring him; elect Trump governor and «I would make New York State one of the great energy capitals of the world and I would cut everybody's taxes in half.»

Jen knows that fully funded schools, healthcare for all, and a clean energy economy that creates good local jobs will remain out of reach unless our state representatives are willing to fix New York's broken tax system and pass legislation that helps working families.

18 - A (TED Part S) Executive Budget - In accordance with the recommendations of the New York State Tax relief Commission, Part S of the TED Article VII legislation, would reduce the Public Service Law § 18 - a (6) Temporary State Energy and Utility Service Conservation Assessment (Temporary Assessment) by a total of $ 200 million per year by eliminating the assessment on industrial utility customers and accelerate the phase out for all other customers.

Part of the fall - out from the energy price freeze promise from Miliband has been an assault on «green taxes» as a driver of high prices.

Rather than give businesses incentives to stay or expand, Hawkins would help them by cutting property taxes, lowering energy costs and taking health care costs out of their hands entirely by creating a statewide single - payer system.

They never meet a business or corporation they didn't want to tax and regulate out of business, with the exception of these green energy joke businesses that the Democrats use to funnel billions of dollars to their campaign contributors.

The energy secretary told Good Morning Britain Nick Clegg had «huge support» after he took millions of the low paid out of tax altogether.

That's why Labour needs to offer hope: a living wage, for instance; letting councils build Britain out of its housing crisis; an industrial strategy to create the renewable energy jobs of the future; turning the bailed - out banks into accountable public investment banks; tax justice; and public ownership of our key utilities.

They then come up with another bizarre statement, that «government is on trial as well as the markets» when everyone actually knows there is a need for restoring a strong positive role for government which alone was able to bail out the banks and prevent a global economic crash as well as alone having the capacity to deal with soaring energy bills and transport fares, tackle climate change, and counter the bonus greed and tax avoidance of the super-rich.

Letter from AAAS CEO Rush Holt to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Regarding Fingerprint Reporting Guidelines [March 28, 2018] AAAS Statement on FY 2018 Omnibus Bill Funds for Scientific Research [March 23, 2018] AAAS Statement on FY 2018 Omnibus Funding Bill [March 22, 2018] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement on Death of Rep. Louise Slaughter [March 16, 2018] AAAS CEO Urges U.S. President and Congress to Lift Funding Restrictions on Gun Violence Research [March 13, 2018] AAAS Statements on Elections and Paper Ballots [March 9, 2018] AAAS Statement on President's 2019 Budget Plan [February 12, 2018] AAAS Statement on FY 2018 Budget Deal and Continuing Resolution [February 9, 2018] AAAS Statement on President Trump's State of the Union Address [January 30, 2018] AAAS Statement on Continuing Resolution Urges FY 2018 Final Omnibus Bill [January 22, 2018] AAAS Statement on U.S. Government Shutdown [January 20, 2018] Community Statement to OMB on Science and Government [December 19, 2017] AAAS CEO Response to Media Report on Use of «Science - Based» at CDC [December 15, 2017] Letter from AAAS and the American Physical Society to Iranian President Hassan Rouhani Regarding Scientist Ahmadreza Djalali [December 15, 2017] Multisociety Letter Conference Graduate Student Tax Provisions [December 7, 2017] Multisociety Letter Presses Senate to Preserve Higher Education Tax Benefits [November 29, 2017] AAAS Multisociety Letter on Tax Reform [November 15, 2017] AAAS Letter to U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee on Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)[November 7, 2017] AAAS Statement on Release of National Climate Assessment Report [November 3, 2017] AAAS Statement on EPA Science Adviser Boards [October 31, 2017] AAAS Statement on EPA Restricting Scientist Communication of Research Results [October 25, 2017] Statement of the Board of Directors of the American Association for the Advancement of Science on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility [October 18, 2017] Scientific Societies» Letter on President Trump's Visa and Immigration Proclamation [October 17, 2017] AAAS Statement on U.S. Withdrawal from UNESCO [October 12, 2017] AAAS Statement on White House Proclamation on Immigration and Visas [September 25, 2017] AAAS Statement from CEO Rush Holt on ARPA - E Reauthorization Act [September 8, 2017] AAAS Speaks Out Against Trump Administration Halt of Young Immigrant Program [September 6, 2017] AAAS Statement on Trump Administration Disbanding National Climate Assessment Advisory Committee [August 22, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Issues Statement On Death of Former Rep. Vern Ehlers [August 17, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt and 15 Other Science Society Leaders Request Climate Science Meeting with EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt [July 31, 2017] AAAS Encourages Congressional Appropriators to Invest in Research and Innovation [July 25, 2017] AAAS CEO Urges Secretary of State to Fill Post of Science and Technology Adviser [July 13, 2017] AAAS and ESA Urge Trump Administration to Protect Monuments [July 7, 2017] AAAS Statement on House Appropriations Bill for the Department of Energy [June 28, 2017] Scientific Organizations Statement on Science and Government [June 27, 2017] AAAS Statement on White House Executive Order on Cuba Relations [June 16, 2017] AAAS Statement on Paris Agreement on Climate Change [June 1, 2017] AAAS Statement from CEO Rush Holt on Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Proposal [May 23, 2017] AAAS thanks the Congress for prioritizing research and development funding in the FY 2017 omnibus appropriations [May 9, 2017] AAAS Statement on Dismissal of Scientists on EPA Scientific Advisory Board [May 8, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement on FY 2017 Appropriations [May 1, 2017] AAAS CEO Statement on Executive Order on Climate Change [March 28, 2017] AAAS leads an intersociety letter on the HONEST Act [March 28, 2017] President's Budget Plan Would Cripple Science and Technology, AAAS Says [March 16, 2017] AAAS Responds to New Immigration Executive Order [March 6, 2017] AAAS CEO Responds to Trump Immigration and Visa Order [January 28, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement on Federal Scientists and Public Communication [January 24, 2017] AAAS thanks leaders of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act [December 21, 2016] AAAS CEO Rush Holt raises concern over President - Elect Donald Trump's EPA Director Selection [December 15, 2016] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement Following the House Passage of 21st Century Cures Act [December 2, 2016] Letter from U.S. scientific, engineering, and higher education community leaders to President - elect Trump's transition team [November 23, 2016] Letter from AAAS CEO Rush Holt to Senate Leaders and Letter to House Leaders to pass a FY 2017 Omnibus Spending Bill [November 15, 2016] AAAS reaffirms the reality of human - caused climate change [June 28, 2016]

Experts said the renewable energy provisions will result in billions of additional dollars in tax breaks for wind and solar power developers, something many Republicans were remiss to hand out.

My children already attend after school activities and I think it's awesome children are doing activities which we would be paying thousands out of our own pockets I feel we working parents as a whole pay enough taxes for extra curriculum activities my children come home happy healthy content and don't have enough energy to roam streets so that means more family time

I've credited Charles Krauthammer a few times for calling for a revenue - neutral gas tax but see no chance of party support for even that level of effort given the provisions of the «Energy Tax Prevention Act» and other party initiatives floating out thetax but see no chance of party support for even that level of effort given the provisions of the «Energy Tax Prevention Act» and other party initiatives floating out theTax Prevention Act» and other party initiatives floating out there?

Whatever we do, as the NYT also pointed out, a raise in gas taxes should be offset by some form of relief for low and middle income families — as it is these households who pay a disproportionate share of their income in energy costs.

Now we're all out on the campaign trail talking about taking the tax subsidies away from the oil companies, some of which were in that 2005 energy bill.

The group points out that if alternative energy providers get tax credits, so too should those helping out by lower in the use of energy in general.

They hand out tax subsidies in the billions to Green Energy development of wind turbines and solar panel arrays.

Some of the policies examined include the B.C. carbon tax, Ontario's Green Energy and Economy Act and phase - out of coal - fired power, Quebec's and Nova Scotia's regulatory cap on emissions, public transit strategies in Ontario, and federal fuel - efficiency standards for cars.

According to our latest analysis, the «real cost of laying out the cash to have a residential solar energy system installed in Utah as of October 2017» — prior to factoring in the 30 percent federal solar investment tax credit — comes in at $ 3.00 per watt, or around $ 15,000 for a typical 5 - kWh solar PV system.

Unfortanely there is no state level tax credit or rebate however, a bill has just passed that introduces and RPS and solar carve out meaning that all utilities in state must source a percentage of energy from solar which creates an SREC market.

Regulating the use of coal and oil out of the economy, increasing redistributive taxes to a massive degree, centralizing control of the energy economy in the government, ceding additional sovereignty to unaccountable international organizations, and creating one additional layer of bureaucracy upon another is not political.

DOE's own Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates a five - year - out (2022) cost of utility - scale solar photovoltaic of 7.37 cents per kilowatt hour (2016 dollars)-- and 5.81 cents per kilowatt hour after applying the Investment Tax Credit subsidy.

Turbines in the US wind market will continue to get bigger as competition among the shrinking number of OEMs intensifies and developers seek a lower levelised cost of energy (LCOE), especially as the production tax credit (PTC) is phased out.

• Kyoto Protocol • EU ETS • Australian CO2 tax and ETS • Mandating and heavily subsidising ($ / TWh delivered) renewable energy • Masses of inappropriate regulations that have inhibited the development of nuclear power, made it perhaps five times more expensive now than it should be, slowed its development, slowed its roll out, caused global CO2 emissions to be 10 % to 20 % higher now than they would otherwise have been, meaning we are on a much slower trajectory to reduce emissions than we would be and, most importantly, we are locked in to fossil fuel electricity generation that causes 10 to 100 times more fatalities per TWh than would be the case if we allowed nuclear to develop (or perhaps 1000 times according to this: http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html • Making building regulations that effectively prevent people from selling, refurbishing or updating their houses if they are close to sea level (the damage to property values and to property owners» life savings is enormous as many examples in Australia are already demonstrating.

We know that things like energy independence, getting off oil, getting out of the Middle East, and creating jobs and economic development in the new clean energy industries of the future are much higher priorities for most voters than capping carbon emissions or taxing dirty energy sources.

From the article: Glenn Schleede, an energy analysts points out that those pushing more tax dollars for energy R&D need to consider the fact that, from 1973 to 2012, the DOE and its predecessors spent $ 154.7 Billion (2012 $) of our tax dollars on «Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsienergy analysts points out that those pushing more tax dollars for energy R&D need to consider the fact that, from 1973 to 2012, the DOE and its predecessors spent $ 154.7 Billion (2012 $) of our tax dollars on «Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsienergy R&D need to consider the fact that, from 1973 to 2012, the DOE and its predecessors spent $ 154.7 Billion (2012 $) of our tax dollars on «Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsiEnergy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsienergy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsidies).

Along with Democratic support for the tax incentives, the presence of renewable energy facilities and manufacturing in many heartland states means Congressional Republicans are likely to balk at repealing them before they phase out.

That said, renewable energy is becoming so economically competitive on its own that the industry now feels comfortable accepting a phase out of the PTC over the next five years, and the tax extenders package that just passed through congress does exactly this.

I just want real - world market competitiveness and reliability before I demonize and tax our current cheap energy providers out of existence.

«If you don't do anything on carbon and you don't have renewable energy standards or investment tax credit, every utility company would go out tomorrow and build coal,» Eric Spiegel, the new CEO of Siemens USA, which is one of the country's top companies for engineering and producing machinery for the new green economy.

My father, a retired engineer used to these kinds of studies, pointed this out when Julia Gillard was offering rebates to pensioners who would be affected by the rising price of energy due to the carbon tax.

Data on the energy intensity of GDP show big variations across time and space, e.g. the sharp decline in US intensity after the oil shocks of the 1970s, which then flattened out as prices came down, and the much lower energy intensity of European nations with high gasoline taxes.

Let's be thankful for Britain in particular and Australia as a close second, two nations who seem to be on the path of proving out, one way or another the feasability, of renewable energy and carbon taxes.

The myriad exemptions given to energy - intensive industries in existing tax shift programs, created out of legitimate competitiveness concerns, slow the creation of more effective tax systems.

In response to skepticism expressed by a journalist at yesterday's press conference as to the political feasibility of such taxes and other measure mentioned above, Dr. Yang Fuqiang of the Energy Foundation and one of the leading co-authors of the report pointed out that the Ministry of Finance is already currently studying the feasibility of implementing a whole range of energy, environmental and carbon Energy Foundation and one of the leading co-authors of the report pointed out that the Ministry of Finance is already currently studying the feasibility of implementing a whole range of energy, environmental and carbon energy, environmental and carbon taxes.

Utilities in the south that miss out on 2016 — The Year of the Wind aren't just missing out on a great opportunity for their ratepayers, they risk losing billions of dollars in wind energy savings as the tax benefits begin to phase out in 2017.

But we don't even have to argue semantics — it's downright misleading for Everley to term cap and trade an «energy tax» because cap and trade would not institute an added cost for all energy production across the board, as he (and the whole fleet of Republicans out there employing this language at the moment) would like you to believe.

Perhaps a better approach would be to look for synergies between near and long term measures, e.g. land use policies that put people out of harm's way and lower transport energy intensity, or recycling carbon tax revenue into disease prevention.