And I * try * to stay
out of arguments since I don't much see the point.
Not exact matches
He's
since pointed
out that the popular understanding
of this maxim is generally oversimplified, but that doesn't undermine the essence
of the
argument — sustained effort over time is a hallmark
of greatness.
A lot
of people have trouble telling the difference between a debate and an
argument but I can as.sure you that I'm here to discuss the ins and
outs of religion (especially christianity
since this blog seems to attract mostly christians... and atheists).
But hey, let me guess, you disagree and having nothing to support your
argument for the non-existence
of GOD,
since you can not answer simply how is it that you exist if there was not a starting point, but an absolute nothing, you act like a bully in a school yard picking the boogers
out of your nose.
Of course, as soon as I point
out that this
argument also justifies drunk driving (even moreso,
since it is a lot safer, on an absolute basis, than childbirth), they are long gone.
In fairness I don't think he meant it in a development context - he'd be clearly wrong
since the Washington Consensus is long dead and overwhelming evidence from Stiglitz, Ha - Joon Chang, Oxfam and others show that no country in history has lifted its people
out of poverty without an active state, the infant industry
arguments etc..
The annulment proved controversial amongst political and business figures, who pointed
out the three - and - a-half-year gap
since the near - collapse
of RBS, and the coincidence
of the referral taking place during a political
argument over bonus payments to the current head
of the bank.
«We have disagreed with that
argument throughout the economic crisis
since it first began in 2007, and have consistently called for substantial counter-cyclical measures to get people into work and
out of the Jobcentre.
A look at the decisions Obama has made
since becoming the nominee — opting
out of public financing, reversing course on the domestic surveillance bill, etc. — suggests a real strain
of pragmatism in his thinking that further bolsters the «steady hand»
argument when it comes to his vice presidential selection.
Since Nick's earlier posting, lawyers for the Senate Majority filed a request asking to reschedule the April 18 oral
arguments to April 19 or 20 because lead counsel Michael Carvin will be
out -
of - town at a funeral.
This whole
argument is particularly fascinating
since Saujani, who has successfully put her experience raising cash for Democrats like Hillary Clinton to work on her own campaign, has a Wall Street background and was one
of the few Democrats (along with Gov. David Paterson and former Democrat Mayor Bloomberg) to speak
out in defense
of the financial industry, highlighting its importance as the state's economic engine.
There are a lot
of dragged -
out arguments, shot in lengthy and ambling one - takes, with most
of them revolving around the notion that Ginny, an actress whose glory days have long
since faded, is an unstable woman.
Best - case scenario: The movie inspires heated
arguments about which
of its two stars shines brighter, which rage on until someone sensibly points
out that it doesn't really matter,
since they're both fantastic, and Carol is much more than the sum
of its performances in any case.
While its
argument for regaining control
of the schools rested on the principle
of local control, a chastened OPSB also pointed
out that it had instituted financial reforms
since the system's bankruptcy prior to Katrina.
As a writer's coach and a successful indie author
since 2002, much
of what was revealed here came as no surprise to me, and the comments made in the interview were the same old
arguments I've seen brought
out over and over, which is by no means a criticism.
Since those secrets are
out and many
of those houses have disappeared, one could make an
argument that some secrets are best kept in order to preserve books and the old guardians who respected them.
Assuming the Reddit investment club wants to sell at - the - money or slightly
out of the money options, the way to maximize time premium capture with this portfolio is to sell the following June call options (note we aren't covering ORAN or TLK because the June options don't pay enough to make it worthwhile; one could make the same
argument for MCD but we decided to leave it in
since it's 3.5 %
out of the money):
This is a corollary
of my
argument that statement credits are worth (much) less than cash: for me, $ 1,300 in airfare is worth a maximum
of $ 700,
since that's the cash value
of the 70,000 US Bank Flexpoints I would otherwise redeem for a reservation costing between $ 1,200 and $ 1,400, and as little as $ 350 or so, which is roughly what I paid
out of pocket for those Flexpoints.
(And FYI: I replied
out of courtesy, but will ignore your replies from now on, because I truly do not care for your opinion
since in the past I have read too many
of your posts to realize that any «
argument» you offer is truly worthwhile.
I'd guess there's no chance
of requiring the geoengineers» CO2 to be pumped back down into the formation while they're sucking
out all the methane,
since their
argument for sucking
out the methane is that It's All Gon na» Blow so why not drill wells, sell and burn it.....
Well, given that I was working on the reply to my uncertainty monster paper, where the IPCC grand poobahs were telling me that they did it right in AR4 and they had natural variability figured
out, I was rather surprised to see these comments, especially
since one
of the persons quoted was a coauthor
of the reply criticizing the attribution
arguments in my uncertainty monster paper.
I will try to get some more specific answers for you and either correct or fill
out this article, but I think the main gist
of the
argument is that there are other factors at play and the simple lack
of a perfect correlation does not mean that CO2 is not the primary driver
of the general warming seen
since 1900.
So,
since it is so important for the diversity
of scientific thought (as well as the cold hard scrutiny
of all ostensibly scientific thought — but despite the clamor for diversity and challenge, this leading site, for laying
out the myriad errors
of climate change skepticism
arguments, is nevertheless, among many other similar ones, decried, denigrated, and dismissed as unworthy and worse)-- what, exactly, is the «contrarian» position?
It would take the juice
out of their
arguments,
since there is a mechanism which can explain the warming.
The Climate Skeptics who do not accept the whole
argument that mankind is primarily responsible for warming are quick to point
out the nearly flat temperture rise
since 1998 is in the presence
of continued CO2 growth.
Since any decision coming
out of these negotiations will set precedents for future debates on international relations, it is important that the international community take the time to think through, and to carefully consider various (and sometimes conflicting)
arguments, leaving no stone unturned.
Therefore, I chose to leave this
argument out of my approach
since I agree with your idea that we should be careful «not to stir up opposition...» Unfortunately, that opposition already exists, therefore, I welcome your explanation
of what ICC members mean when they say tinys are already included in the code.
There's some goal - post moving in your
argument since I thought the issue was prediction
of the climate a few decades
out.
[Sea levels] are [rising]
since we got
out of the last ice age 20.000 years ago when the sea is 130 m below the current level This is a very weak
argument.
however
since Judith wrote that, the video
of the presentation has been made available, so we have seen the slides, and we know the basis
of the
argument, and the fatal flaw in the
argument has been pointed
out.
The problem with that
argument is that over long periods
of time (like the six decades
since 1950), positive and negative phases
of ocean cycles tend to cancel each other
out, and thus internal variability doesn't have a large influence on long - term temperatures.
The consensus
of most scientists, arduously hammered
out in a series
of international workshops, flatly rejected the
argument that the soaring temperatures
since the 1960s could be dismissed as a consequence
of changes on the Sun.
The corolary is that Lomborg's point is rational, but
since we are emotional creatures, it is normal to feel unease about it and reject the whole
argument out of it.
However the truth or otherwise via presentation
of evidence and
of arguments and rebuttals has been specifically ruled
out since the ICO sees no point,
since nothing can be done due to the time limits.
In the wake
of a New York Times article pointing
out that five years have elapsed
since the last time Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a high court oral
argument, legal observers have been weighing in on the significance
of this lengthy silence.
But it does mean that counsel can rarely get
out a prepared
argument,
since the bulk
of the hour will be spent responding to questions.»
I suppose you could make a charter
argument out of it but I think it would be a pretty weak one
since being mayor hardly qualifies as a «right».
The
argument could be made that this is the case and that some law professors are simply
out of touch
since they refuse to adapt to the times, but the counterargument could be that they need not address particular technologies, but simply legal principles.
Our relationship was very good from the beginning when she was unemployed however
since she got employed we'd have
arguments that led to her wanting to get a place
of her own but we managed to work things
out.