Sentences with phrase «out of discussions with»

As a general rule, try to keep grown - up issues out of discussions with your child.

The project, led by Chapman, was borne out of discussions with public school and park officials who asked for food safety guidelines for school and community gardens.

Now it seems the same thing has happened with Kieran Gibbs as Watford have pulled out of discussions with Arsenal refusing to budge on his # 15 million asking price.

Our approach to flexible work hours also came out of discussions with employees.

Once you had no answer to his penetrating questions you essentially cried, «foul,» and checked out of the discussion with him.

«Where did this man come from that all of a sudden he wants to stop us from doing our projects» an agitated staff was heard firing when walking out of a discussion with his colleagues in an office.

Not exact matches

ExpressJet continues to engage in discussions around the CRJ700s scheduled to come out of service with Delta later this year and remains pleased with the level of demand for the CRJ700 product.

Among the changes that came out of the forest industry's discussions with its fiercest critics were ecosystem - based forest management and third - party certification of wood and paper products — compromises that offered a way out of the standoff.

Trump on Monday railed against the recent string of attacks in Afghanistan, and ruled out any US discussions with the Taliban as part of the effort to seek peace talks between the Afghan government and the insurgents.

Thanks to pioneering journalism and stigma - busting public discussion of mental health issues by members of the entrepreneurship community, the toll starting a business can take on your mental health and the seemingly high prevalence of struggles with depression among founders are starting to come out in the open.

Indeed, for all the discussion of the production rate for 737s or the combat range of the F / A -18 C Hornet, McNerney's 20 months at Boeing have been about leading an organization of more than 150,000 employees, with sales of more than $ 59 billion, out of a moral abyss.

Cohen, the veteran Trump consigliere, claims he cut Daniels a $ 130,000 check out of his own pocket with no thought of repayment or discussion or coordination with anyone else in Trump world.

Ray Ferrara, the former chairman of the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards who's chairman and CEO of dually registered ProVise Management Group in Clearwater, Florida, noted on a panel discussion at the event that he expects his firm to shell out «less than $ 10,000 in our hard costs» to comply with the fiduciary rule, but didn't anticipate «any significant ongoing [compliance] costs.»

«We did start out with a number of discussions around a joint venture, but we quickly saw there was a vision that we...

Specifically, Robert McCormick, chief policy officer with Glass Lewis, sees the importance of the CSA putting the issue out for open discussion.

In a press release by PETA, the animal rights group noted that in discussions with Tesla, PETA pointed out the possibility for the electric car company to reduce its carbon footprint through the usage of vegan leather.

REVOLUTIONIZING WELLNESS IN THE WORKPLACE: DINNER AND DISCUSSION WITH ARIANNA HUFFINGTON The queen of new media has set out to help teach companies how to transform the office into a sanctuary for well - being.

You know, this trade discussion around how it works out with China is a bigger deal than people give credit to because they are literally 50 % of the demand in the world for commodities: iron ore, nickel, aluminum, zinc.

The sentiment seemed widespread on tech and media Twitter: there was a lack of specificity in terms of questions about privacy (this allowed Zuckerberg to turn nearly every question about the ownership of data to a discussion about user interface controls that limit where data is shown to other Facebook users), plenty of dodged questions (every time there was a question about the data Facebook generates about users beyond what they themselves enter into the system Zuckerberg needed to «check with his team»), and bad questions that presumed Facebook sells data, letting Zuckerberg run out the clock at least three times by explaining the basics of Facebook's business model (this is precisely why I have been so outspoken about the problem of perpetrating this falsehood: it lets Facebook off the hook).

The new report starts out with a summary of recent events (the topics addressed are: bubble & crash, hacks & scams, reaction & regulation and adoption & trends), an in - depth discussion of whether bitcoin's surge actually deserves to be called a bubble (which we found particularly interesting), and a section that deals extensively with the schism in the bitcoin community that led to the fork that created Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and other offshoots.

Preston: [00:19:26] So if I wanted to have a transaction with you and I wanted it to be included on the blockchain but there's they're running out of space on the blockchain if I include a tip, like hey here's an extra dollar here's an extra $ 2 for this transaction I'm trying to have with my buddy that was that tip went to the minors which I'm not even going to get into the discussion about minors here.

«Before we put this out, we had a lot of discussions... how are we doing with diversity and inclusion?

One of the reasons is that there is so much bad news priced into the euro, clearly you may want to wait out what's happening with the discussions with Greece on how that is playing out.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt Speaks Out Wednesday's Search Engine Strategies Conference kicked off with a keynote discussion between Danny Sullivan and Eric Schmidt, CEO of...

Tom: We have reached out and had discussions on an ongoing basis with all major search engines since we started tackling the problem of click fraud.

We have reached out and had discussions on an ongoing basis with all major search engines since we started tackling the problem of click fraud.

In the first episode, you hear him make a fool out of himself in front of prominent Silicon Valley investor Chris Sacca and in many episodes, you hear earnest discussions with his wife Nazanin about the company and their future.

These responsibilities include: (i) fostering processes that allow the Board to function independently of management and encouraging open and effective communication between the Board and management of the Company; (ii) providing input to the Chairman on behalf of the independent Directors with respect to Board agendas; (iii) presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, as well as regularly scheduled executive sessions of independent Directors; (iv) in the case of a conflict of interest involving a Director, if appropriate, asking the conflicted Director to leave the room during discussion concerning such matter and, if appropriate, asking such Director to recuse him or herself from voting on the relevant matter; (v) communicating with the Chairman and the CEO, as appropriate, regarding meetings of the independent Directors and resources and information necessary for the Board to effectively carry out its duties and responsibilities; (vi) serving as liaison between the Chairman and the independent Directors; (vii) being available to Directors who have concerns that can not be addressed through the Chairman; (viii) having the authority to call meetings of the independent Directors; and (ix) performing other functions as may reasonably be requested by the Board or the Chairman.

They especially fear any discussion that goes to the principles of the tradition, preferring to live as best as they can with whatever compromise is worked out.

There are discussions to be avoided like the plague, and it's almost never a good idea to step in with the idea of sorting them out.

It makes them feel good to lash out her somebody who if they actually spoke face to face with they could just have a reasonable discussion of the topic that could change minds.

And, now that I've said that, I will point out that this has absolutely nothing to do with the abortion question, and is merely a de-railment of the discussion of a woman's right to decide what takes place in her body.

All new members write out and submit (for discussion with a staff person) a personal plan for spiritual growth, specifying how they intend to build the values of discipleship into their lives.

When I had a «discussion» with one of my sons when they were small we compromised on a way forward through a deal, you might call it an unwritten contract, binding on both sides, I could have beaten the living daylights out of him, but that would have not solved the problem, I may have won the battle but not the war.

A blog with a community of discussion like this is an excellent place to bring this out since it's easy for many voices to weigh in, rather than just those specially chosen to give their view.

I'm not interested in using this space to sidetrack the discussion into this arena but simply noting that this teaching is seen as an out of sync with even the most liberal teachings on the topic.

Brown finishes with a remarkable discussion of the Christology of Nestorius and Cyril of Alexandria in their effort to sort out both the distance and solidarity between the Father and Son by comparing it to the distance between God and believer and between rich and poor.

Chesterton's claim to be a Zionist may seem eccentric to us: but, again, it is hardly anti-Semitic: nor was it unusual (there was at the time a well - established tradition of Christian Zionism, of which A.J. Balfour is the most obvious example): it is why a group of Zionists invited Chesterton to Palestine, where he met and had a day - long discussion with Chaim Weizmann, later the first President of Israel, whoas a result became an admirer of Chesterton: Weizmann would certainly have sniffed out an anti-Semite if Chesterton had actually been one.

I was just doing this as part of my trilogy; it started with Buddha and then Jesus, and now it turns out serendipitously that the timing is appropriate because there is so much discussion about Islam in the world.

I know you're not going to agree with all of this, but I thought I'd put it out there for discussion to get your thoughts.

The popular idea leaves out the necessary human element of study, of the consultation of experts and theologians, of discussion with its inevitable clash of opinions.

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

I shall not delay the discussion here to defend Bergson against his critics, except to point out that what is frequently termed «irrationalism» in Bergson is precisely what he has in common with all modern disciplines that take the dimension of depth seriously.

Several of us entered into a heated discussion with our visitor, out of which a relative consensus emerged: We do read the classic texts of Latin American theology (Gutiérrez, Boff, Segundo, Sobrino, Miguez Bonino and others), some of them for their historical importance, others for their continuing relevance.

I think given equal opportunities there will be a natural inclination for many towards traditional roles and that this is healthy, has nothing to do with any artificial social construct but is natural and comes out of biology and now might be the time to be having open discussions about this kind of thing without having to face the fear of being labelled misogynistic for doing so or with feeling fearful of any threat to equality.

Her selective analysis of Ephesians 5 points out the need to begin the discussion with verse 21 («Be subject to one another...») and then proceeds to concentrate on verses 25ff, which stress the husband's self - giving love.

In one of my discussions with the youth of Malaipallaiyam they brought out the idea that the goddess is situated at the boundary of the colony because she stands as a warning to those persons who may cast an «evil eye» on the people (particularly, the women and the children), land and property of the Paraiyars.

But he could not tell them why Aquinas thought the soul is immortal, as Aquinas undoubtedly did, and his paper ran out with a discussion of understanding, not the soul.

Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.

HOLLOWAY»S REASONABLE EPISTEMOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Dear Father Editor With regards to your September 2006 editorial («The Catholic Vision of Matter: Towards a New Synthesis») and the discussion arising out of it (recent Letters pages), it seems to me that a more fruitful frame of reference for the debate might be Thomas» epistemology.