This isn't the same as a phase -
out of fossil fuels entirely.
Not exact matches
One
of the things pointed
out in that post is that we know that the rise in atmospheric CO2 is
entirely caused by
fossil fuel burning and deforestation because many independent observations show that the carbon content has also increased in the ocean.
Radiative Transfer Physics does not depend
entirely on the simple absorbtivity
of CO2, which by the way is effectively permanent in air when added by burning
fossil fuels, compared to water which saturates and precipitates
out depending on climate conditions, such as warming due the GHE, as a marginal shift in the dynamic equilibrium through feedbacks.
Instead, you build a wall between that information and the public, built
entirely out of a very powerful emotion: anger, toward «denier scientists» who shill for
fossil fuel companies in a massive, sinister disinformation campaign.
By contrast, the
fossil fuels coming
out of the ground formed from
entirely pure, naturally occurring ingredients: --RRB-
But whereas I think that SA has probably overstated the capacity
of renewables to replace
fossil fuels as things stand or as they're like to exist in the next decade or so (30 years
out is another story
entirely), I am absolutely certain that your «plan» is utter fantasy land.