Not exact matches
So Shepherd had to come up with a method for taking the salt
out of sea water with boilers and kettles but
without incurring the bloated carbon footprint
of fossil fuels, which would betray the green ideals
of his customer base.
If we could pull carbon
out of the air and use it to wean cars off
fossil fuels, that would go a long way toward reducing humankind's production
of greenhouse gases
without impeding technological progress.
But as Kurt E. Yeager, former president
of the Electric Power Research Institute in Palo Alto, Calif., points
out, such standards «aren't worth the paper they're written on until we have a power system, a grid, that is capable
of assimilating that intermittent energy
without having to build large quantities
of backup power,
fossil -
fueled, to enable it.»
Advocates say the carbon footprint
of bioplastics is better than
fossil fuel - derived alternatives, which is true, but as «Life
Without Plastic» points
out, there's the added issue
of supporting genetically modified corn production, which currently provides most material for bioplastics.
In the meantime, the world's poorest two or three billion people, emitting less than one ton
of carbon dioxide per person per year (compared to the 20 tons per - capita average
of the United States), could be propelled
out of poverty with additional
fossil fuel use
without substantially interfering with efforts to rein in the richest populations» emissions.
An even shorter version is: It is getting warmer; CO2 is a greenhouse gas and so an increase in it will drive warming (logarithmically
without feedbacks); we are taking many gigatons
of C
out of the earth and dumping it into the biosphere as CO2; the increase in CO2 and the change
of isotopes in the C are consistent with the source being the
fossil fuels we are burning.
If only that much people (one
out of ten) could manage to have a really decent life, yet, with (and historically only once was) «easy»
fossil fuel energy source available, is it reasonable to expect that 10 times more people will manage to do so in future
without that exceptional source
of energy and much less «easy» renewable energy sources?
This would encourage conservation and development
of fossil -
fuel alternatives
without taking any money
out of the private economy.
(2) We're going to be running
out of fossil fuels anyway in the next few centuries;
without alternatives, global economic prosperity will be endangered much sooner than that.
In the case
of Germany, where nuclear power is being phased
out and
fossil fuels are taboo because
of plans to decarbonize, the only option may be to accept periods
without electricity putting a civilized nation back centuries.
One third
of US
fossil -
fuel production is from federal lands, so remaining
fossil -
fuel production could be reduced substantially simply by letting the current leases run
out,
without establishing new ones.
Demesure, I think there's very powerful arguments for phasing
out fossil fuels in favour
of nuclear energy, even
without AGW.
All those who make use
of goods and services that involve the use
of fossil fuels are helping to keep the
fossil fuel companies in business
Without their money the
fossil fuel companies would go
out of business.
The failure
of «cheap energy» is splitting Americans into two rival camps: one that is enthusiastic about needless subsidy
of oil and gas and another that sees
without fossil subsidies renewable sources and more
fuel - efficient cars and trucks come
out ahead in the Market.
It's a companion website to the 1973: Sorry,
Out of Gas show at the CCA in Montreal that we covered earlier; it shows the approaches architects and designers used to deal with sun, earth and wind to live
without fossil fuels.
It has been argued that a scenario phasing
out carbon emissions fast enough to stabilize climate this century, limiting further warming to a maximum
of several tenths
of a degree Celsius, is still possible, but it would require a rising price on carbon emissions sufficient to spur transition to a clean energy future
without burning all
fossil fuels (33).