Sentences with phrase «out of government really»

Not exact matches

The government's job is to create infrastructure and really get out of the way and allow the movement of free trade.
If this really were a «free market» economy, their shareholders would be wiped out — and the government would demand return of the exorbitant bonuses and salaries.
People fight to take the bible out of government inst itutions and schools because it is not really the word of a god.
This is very far from being a new analysis: Family and Youth Concern, still battling away, was doing pioneering work over 30 years ago (for which its founder, Valerie Riches, was deservedly made a papal dame), pointing out how disastrous for society the undermining of the traditional family based on marriage - not least by successive governments - really was.
Obama has really done a great job with America, he has pushed for equality and has improved the economy since Bush was taken out of our government, sure it has been a slow re-growth but that is expected since the majority of Republicans really messed everyone over.
And yeah, it would require more personal responsibility from all of us, but if the government is just automatically taking your money (out of your paycheck each month) and doing your charity work for you — that's not really loving your neighbor anyway, is it?
I really hope that the GOP catches up on domestic issues and realizes that religion needs to stay out of politics, because I and many others believe that Small government where the majority of power is left to the states is the superior form of government, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Which leads me to wonder, first, whether Christianity really is so weak in Tennessee that it needs the coercive power of the government to maintain itself, and, second, whether the commitment to limited government of Tennessee's Republicans is so thin that it does not require the state to stay out of our individual decisions concerning where (and whether) to pray, and to whom.
To finish, religion and government should be completely separated, religion should be private and should not be discussed / debated to get more votes and they should stick to what really matters which is getting the economy back on track, getting people jobs, and getting corruption out of businesses / government.
Its teachings are very, very simple: There really are free and natural markets where the optimum value of things is assigned to them; everyone must compete with everyone; the worthy will prosper and the unworthy fail; those who succeed while others fail will be made deeply and justly happy by this experience, having had no other object in life; each of us is poorer for every cent that is used toward the wealth of all of us; governments are instituted among people chiefly to interfere with the working out of these splendid principles.
When anybody — pressure groups, governments, civilizations — suddenly change the meaning of key words, you really should watch out.
There was no reason to just through out laws which seemed to provide for a stable, peaceful society so they only really changed the parts that didn't mesh with the republican form of government they set up (ie references to the crown, privliges for the nobility, etc).
I'm a libertarian, which means I tend to vote Republican almost entirely on the basis that I really just don't trust the government to do almost anything right and always tax the hell out of us so they and their friends can get rich, which is what the Dems love to do, but the Republican party is making it harder and harder for me to continue voting for them with asinine statements like this.
don't forget the absolute evil perpetrated by those who so resolutely looked to push all religion our of their societies... the Nazi's, the Soviets, the Chinese Communists... I'm not really one to toss out numbers w / o some good backing, but I would venture a guess that those 3 20th century areligious governments killed way more than the Catholics and Crusaders did.
We really really have to get religion out of government or we'll be no different than those backward countries in the middle east.
If you haven't yet «liked» the page, you're missing out on some great reader discussion (in fact, posts with zero comments on the main blog are often getting talked about quite a bit on Facebook) along with the grand unveiling of the new USDA MyPlate icon (replacing the old Food Pyramid); a distressing graphic of what the White House garden would look like if it were the recipient of current farm subsidies (hint: hope you like corn); a great Father's Day gift idea for dads who cook; news of an exhibit of vintage government food posters; an egg salad recipe; and even a chance to win a coveted (not really) Lunch Tray fridge magnet!
Of course, as Littlejohn rightly points out, after 13 years of Labour government, «if the public really did have the power to change legislation, the government would pass a law against it»Of course, as Littlejohn rightly points out, after 13 years of Labour government, «if the public really did have the power to change legislation, the government would pass a law against it»of Labour government, «if the public really did have the power to change legislation, the government would pass a law against it».
Given the problems Britain is experiencing with alienation from political elites, the rise of «anti-politics» parties like UKIP, and the widespread perception amongst the public that the governing classes are «out of touch» — is imposing a new form of government on Greater Manchester without popular consent really a good idea?
Siena pollster Don Levy: «When we took a look specifically at three functions of government and asked New Yorkers «Who do ya think is doing a better job, local or state,» - there's where the big difference really jumps out.
Democratic control of all aspects of NY government is really working out well... now Democratic appointees get to investigate Democratic corruption.
The tone was set by speakers such as Sue Cohen of the Single Parent Action Network who condemned the government for «riding on a climate of bigotry towards lone parents created by the last Tory government», and Marion Davis of One Plus, the major one parent organisation in Scotland, who pointed out that «the present government is looking towards the US» and asked «Do we really want to live in a society where lone mothers have to queue up at soup kitchens as they do in the US?»
So while the Libertarian «solution» to inequality is for the government to get out of the way, it's really not hard to show how discrimination could get completely out of hand in that situation.
Suppose it turned out that the majority of people on a candidate's selection commitee (I could also hace said lover or wife but was looking for somebody really powerful) turned out to be government employees.
As Nick Clegg — once the voters had thrown him out of government — said himself, Osborne's behaviour was «very unattractive, very cynical»; for him, welfare «was just a bottomless pit of savings, and it didn't really matter what the human consequences were», it was just a means to boost his party's popularity.
But is it really inevitable that governments run out of steam?
Because obviously the reason he said this is because he is «evil» or «just doesn't get it» and really wants to screw the life out of the VOTING punters for these reasons and not, in fact, because we're in the middle of a bloody big recession and any government couldn't afford to maintain the previous levels of boom - time public spending.
«If the government really expects to encourage people out of their cars and onto public transport, allowing these fares to rise is completely the wrong way to go about it.»
As for the claim that is widely made by good government groups and left leaning reformers that establishing a public campaign finance system would go a long way toward getting big money out of the political system and reducing corruption, New Yorkers aren't really on board.
That's really going to help get the socailist / commies out of government.
We are also entitled to ask where, if Labour is really committed to the new politics, are any of the other measures deemed essential by reformers, such as sorting out the House of Lords, devolving power to local government, a written constititution, more representative MPs in terms of gender and race, and state funding of political parties?
By coming out in force this festive season the Church has used its highest - profile time of year, when people really listen to its opinion, to wholeheartedly condemn the government.
«The fact that he's looking to charge the legislature, the body tasked with making this decision, really is something out of a dictorial regime masquerading as a democratic government,» Lorigo said.
No attempt has been made to carry out a complete postmortem of what really happened in government.
Unlike Greece, the U.S. borrows in its own national currency: whereas the Greek government can run out of euros, the U.S. government can not really run out of dollars as long as the Federal Reserve provides them.
When the government says it is concerned about the impact of MUP on moderate drinkers, they are simply repeating propaganda which has been put out by the drinks industry to try and preserve the huge profits they are making from people drinking at really dangerous levels.
«This election represented such a large change and threw such uncertainty onto the place of science in American government that we really had to reach out right away to the president - elect,» he says.
That old Food Pyramid (which gave King Tut Heart Disease) certainly was outdated and all of us dumb people lacking in government credentials couldn't really figure out that you were just telling us to eat lots of carbs, some fruits and veggies and very little meat, fats, oils and sweets.
I think we have to remember one thing that's really important: Especially on the Mexican side, this movement was born out of an absolute failure of government institutions.
Now that the federal government is out of the way, can the states really get anything done?
Andy, who is credited with authoring a Brookings white paper that helped inspire RTT, points out that «In the case of Race to the Top, while it wasn't a disaster, there were enough problems that some people favorably inclined... are now asking if the federal government, with all the political and substantive constraints upon it, can really run a reliable high - stakes competition.»
«We tried to push that, and it never really got done because I don't think anyone understood how the federal government could create carrots,» says Kress, pointing out that the feds contribute a small portion, about 12 percent, of the public school budget.
Christine Blower, leader of the National Union of Teachers, accused the government of «claiming that it cares about standards» while really carrying out an «extended and accelerated privatisation of our school system».
Whether it's a pissed off French mime, a really hopeful lawyer playing the lawsuit lottery out of California, the government of Thailand, or a handful of savages eager to use a cartoon of Mohammad as an excuse to burn, loot, rape, and kill — they're going to step aside and let the publisher bear the blame.
What really concerns me is that the Canadian government is not in the habit of giving out gifts to the Canadian tax payer and that is exactly what this account is.
It seems great, but, really, you're giving the government an interest - free loan for most of the year, and you could get more out of that money if it was paid directly to you.
Instead of taking the easy way out and simply putting a Band - Aid on the problem, what could the government have done to really make a difference?
Home Page Interest Only Loans California Home Loan Refinancing California Home Mortgage Loans Refinancing Mortgage With Bad Credit History Subprime Mortgage Loan Refi Bad Credit Mortgage Bad Credit Mortgage Refinance Refinance Car Loan Credit Report Help Credit Cards Bad Credit Credit Cards Government Backed Mortgages No Fax Payday Loan Pay Day Cash Advance Loans Quick Payday Loan No Credit Check Payday Loan Bad Credit Payday Loans Bad Credit Auto Loans Auto Loan Refinance New Car Loan Debt Consolidation Mortgage Debt Consolidator Debt Problems Bad Credit Debt Consolidation Credit Card Debt Consolidation Debt Consolidation Services Debt Solutions Debt Elimination Non Profit Debt Consolidation Eliminate Credit Card Debt Unsecured Debt Consolidation Credit Card Debt Help Online Debt Consolidation Get Out of Debt 100 Percent Mortgage Financing Free Payday Loan Calculator Foreclosed Homes Credit Repair Resources Articles Contact Florida Mortgage Refinance Mortgage Lone Bad Credit No Down Payment Mortgages Debt Reduction Debt Management 1st Time Home Buyers Second Mortgages Bad Credit 2nd Mortgage Really Bad Credit Loans Privacy Policy Site Map Disclaimer: This information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not providing legal or financial advice.
Considering the variety of proposals floated recently to restrict money market mutual funds, one need not be paranoid to think that people at some government agencies really want to put MMFs out of business.
The government is giving out a lot of land to India, Malaysia, to big companies to come and grow sugarcane and cotton and it's really causing conflict in the region.
If you really do believe that freedom means governments getting out of the way of corporations and that any regulation leads us down Hayek's road to serfdom, then climate science is going to be kryptonite to you.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z