Not exact matches
The
government's job is to create infrastructure and
really get
out of the way and allow the movement
of free trade.
If this
really were a «free market» economy, their shareholders would be wiped
out — and the
government would demand return
of the exorbitant bonuses and salaries.
People fight to take the bible
out of government inst itutions and schools because it is not
really the word
of a god.
This is very far from being a new analysis: Family and Youth Concern, still battling away, was doing pioneering work over 30 years ago (for which its founder, Valerie Riches, was deservedly made a papal dame), pointing
out how disastrous for society the undermining
of the traditional family based on marriage - not least by successive
governments -
really was.
Obama has
really done a great job with America, he has pushed for equality and has improved the economy since Bush was taken
out of our
government, sure it has been a slow re-growth but that is expected since the majority
of Republicans
really messed everyone over.
And yeah, it would require more personal responsibility from all
of us, but if the
government is just automatically taking your money (
out of your paycheck each month) and doing your charity work for you — that's not
really loving your neighbor anyway, is it?
I
really hope that the GOP catches up on domestic issues and realizes that religion needs to stay
out of politics, because I and many others believe that Small
government where the majority
of power is left to the states is the superior form
of government, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Which leads me to wonder, first, whether Christianity
really is so weak in Tennessee that it needs the coercive power
of the
government to maintain itself, and, second, whether the commitment to limited
government of Tennessee's Republicans is so thin that it does not require the state to stay
out of our individual decisions concerning where (and whether) to pray, and to whom.
To finish, religion and
government should be completely separated, religion should be private and should not be discussed / debated to get more votes and they should stick to what
really matters which is getting the economy back on track, getting people jobs, and getting corruption
out of businesses /
government.
Its teachings are very, very simple: There
really are free and natural markets where the optimum value
of things is assigned to them; everyone must compete with everyone; the worthy will prosper and the unworthy fail; those who succeed while others fail will be made deeply and justly happy by this experience, having had no other object in life; each
of us is poorer for every cent that is used toward the wealth
of all
of us;
governments are instituted among people chiefly to interfere with the working
out of these splendid principles.
When anybody — pressure groups,
governments, civilizations — suddenly change the meaning
of key words, you
really should watch
out.
There was no reason to just through
out laws which seemed to provide for a stable, peaceful society so they only
really changed the parts that didn't mesh with the republican form
of government they set up (ie references to the crown, privliges for the nobility, etc).
I'm a libertarian, which means I tend to vote Republican almost entirely on the basis that I
really just don't trust the
government to do almost anything right and always tax the hell
out of us so they and their friends can get rich, which is what the Dems love to do, but the Republican party is making it harder and harder for me to continue voting for them with asinine statements like this.
don't forget the absolute evil perpetrated by those who so resolutely looked to push all religion our
of their societies... the Nazi's, the Soviets, the Chinese Communists... I'm not
really one to toss
out numbers w / o some good backing, but I would venture a guess that those 3 20th century areligious
governments killed way more than the Catholics and Crusaders did.
We
really really have to get religion
out of government or we'll be no different than those backward countries in the middle east.
If you haven't yet «liked» the page, you're missing
out on some great reader discussion (in fact, posts with zero comments on the main blog are often getting talked about quite a bit on Facebook) along with the grand unveiling
of the new USDA MyPlate icon (replacing the old Food Pyramid); a distressing graphic
of what the White House garden would look like if it were the recipient
of current farm subsidies (hint: hope you like corn); a great Father's Day gift idea for dads who cook; news
of an exhibit
of vintage
government food posters; an egg salad recipe; and even a chance to win a coveted (not
really) Lunch Tray fridge magnet!
Of course, as Littlejohn rightly points out, after 13 years of Labour government, «if the public really did have the power to change legislation, the government would pass a law against it»
Of course, as Littlejohn rightly points
out, after 13 years
of Labour government, «if the public really did have the power to change legislation, the government would pass a law against it»
of Labour
government, «if the public
really did have the power to change legislation, the
government would pass a law against it».
Given the problems Britain is experiencing with alienation from political elites, the rise
of «anti-politics» parties like UKIP, and the widespread perception amongst the public that the governing classes are «
out of touch» — is imposing a new form
of government on Greater Manchester without popular consent
really a good idea?
Siena pollster Don Levy: «When we took a look specifically at three functions
of government and asked New Yorkers «Who do ya think is doing a better job, local or state,» - there's where the big difference
really jumps
out.
Democratic control
of all aspects
of NY
government is
really working
out well... now Democratic appointees get to investigate Democratic corruption.
The tone was set by speakers such as Sue Cohen
of the Single Parent Action Network who condemned the
government for «riding on a climate
of bigotry towards lone parents created by the last Tory
government», and Marion Davis
of One Plus, the major one parent organisation in Scotland, who pointed
out that «the present
government is looking towards the US» and asked «Do we
really want to live in a society where lone mothers have to queue up at soup kitchens as they do in the US?»
So while the Libertarian «solution» to inequality is for the
government to get
out of the way, it's
really not hard to show how discrimination could get completely
out of hand in that situation.
Suppose it turned
out that the majority
of people on a candidate's selection commitee (I could also hace said lover or wife but was looking for somebody
really powerful) turned
out to be
government employees.
As Nick Clegg — once the voters had thrown him
out of government — said himself, Osborne's behaviour was «very unattractive, very cynical»; for him, welfare «was just a bottomless pit
of savings, and it didn't
really matter what the human consequences were», it was just a means to boost his party's popularity.
But is it
really inevitable that
governments run
out of steam?
Because obviously the reason he said this is because he is «evil» or «just doesn't get it» and
really wants to screw the life
out of the VOTING punters for these reasons and not, in fact, because we're in the middle
of a bloody big recession and any
government couldn't afford to maintain the previous levels
of boom - time public spending.
«If the
government really expects to encourage people
out of their cars and onto public transport, allowing these fares to rise is completely the wrong way to go about it.»
As for the claim that is widely made by good
government groups and left leaning reformers that establishing a public campaign finance system would go a long way toward getting big money
out of the political system and reducing corruption, New Yorkers aren't
really on board.
That's
really going to help get the socailist / commies
out of government.
We are also entitled to ask where, if Labour is
really committed to the new politics, are any
of the other measures deemed essential by reformers, such as sorting
out the House
of Lords, devolving power to local
government, a written constititution, more representative MPs in terms
of gender and race, and state funding
of political parties?
By coming
out in force this festive season the Church has used its highest - profile time
of year, when people
really listen to its opinion, to wholeheartedly condemn the
government.
«The fact that he's looking to charge the legislature, the body tasked with making this decision,
really is something
out of a dictorial regime masquerading as a democratic
government,» Lorigo said.
No attempt has been made to carry
out a complete postmortem
of what
really happened in
government.
Unlike Greece, the U.S. borrows in its own national currency: whereas the Greek
government can run
out of euros, the U.S.
government can not
really run
out of dollars as long as the Federal Reserve provides them.
When the
government says it is concerned about the impact
of MUP on moderate drinkers, they are simply repeating propaganda which has been put
out by the drinks industry to try and preserve the huge profits they are making from people drinking at
really dangerous levels.
«This election represented such a large change and threw such uncertainty onto the place
of science in American
government that we
really had to reach
out right away to the president - elect,» he says.
That old Food Pyramid (which gave King Tut Heart Disease) certainly was outdated and all
of us dumb people lacking in
government credentials couldn't
really figure
out that you were just telling us to eat lots
of carbs, some fruits and veggies and very little meat, fats, oils and sweets.
I think we have to remember one thing that's
really important: Especially on the Mexican side, this movement was born
out of an absolute failure
of government institutions.
Now that the federal
government is
out of the way, can the states
really get anything done?
Andy, who is credited with authoring a Brookings white paper that helped inspire RTT, points
out that «In the case
of Race to the Top, while it wasn't a disaster, there were enough problems that some people favorably inclined... are now asking if the federal
government, with all the political and substantive constraints upon it, can
really run a reliable high - stakes competition.»
«We tried to push that, and it never
really got done because I don't think anyone understood how the federal
government could create carrots,» says Kress, pointing
out that the feds contribute a small portion, about 12 percent,
of the public school budget.
Christine Blower, leader
of the National Union
of Teachers, accused the
government of «claiming that it cares about standards» while
really carrying
out an «extended and accelerated privatisation
of our school system».
Whether it's a pissed off French mime, a
really hopeful lawyer playing the lawsuit lottery
out of California, the
government of Thailand, or a handful
of savages eager to use a cartoon
of Mohammad as an excuse to burn, loot, rape, and kill — they're going to step aside and let the publisher bear the blame.
What
really concerns me is that the Canadian
government is not in the habit
of giving
out gifts to the Canadian tax payer and that is exactly what this account is.
It seems great, but,
really, you're giving the
government an interest - free loan for most
of the year, and you could get more
out of that money if it was paid directly to you.
Instead
of taking the easy way
out and simply putting a Band - Aid on the problem, what could the
government have done to
really make a difference?
Home Page Interest Only Loans California Home Loan Refinancing California Home Mortgage Loans Refinancing Mortgage With Bad Credit History Subprime Mortgage Loan Refi Bad Credit Mortgage Bad Credit Mortgage Refinance Refinance Car Loan Credit Report Help Credit Cards Bad Credit Credit Cards
Government Backed Mortgages No Fax Payday Loan Pay Day Cash Advance Loans Quick Payday Loan No Credit Check Payday Loan Bad Credit Payday Loans Bad Credit Auto Loans Auto Loan Refinance New Car Loan Debt Consolidation Mortgage Debt Consolidator Debt Problems Bad Credit Debt Consolidation Credit Card Debt Consolidation Debt Consolidation Services Debt Solutions Debt Elimination Non Profit Debt Consolidation Eliminate Credit Card Debt Unsecured Debt Consolidation Credit Card Debt Help Online Debt Consolidation Get
Out of Debt 100 Percent Mortgage Financing Free Payday Loan Calculator Foreclosed Homes Credit Repair Resources Articles Contact Florida Mortgage Refinance Mortgage Lone Bad Credit No Down Payment Mortgages Debt Reduction Debt Management 1st Time Home Buyers Second Mortgages Bad Credit 2nd Mortgage
Really Bad Credit Loans Privacy Policy Site Map Disclaimer: This information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not providing legal or financial advice.
Considering the variety
of proposals floated recently to restrict money market mutual funds, one need not be paranoid to think that people at some
government agencies
really want to put MMFs
out of business.
The
government is giving
out a lot
of land to India, Malaysia, to big companies to come and grow sugarcane and cotton and it's
really causing conflict in the region.
If you
really do believe that freedom means
governments getting
out of the way
of corporations and that any regulation leads us down Hayek's road to serfdom, then climate science is going to be kryptonite to you.