Adrift and nearly out of money after three months of living
out of his van in the Washington area, the gunman who shot a top House Republican and four other people on a Virginia baseball field didn't have any concrete plans to inflict violence on the Republicans he loathed, FBI officials said.
Without the pipeline you're someone selling shoes
out of a van in a shopping center parking lot.
Not exact matches
To get into this line
of work, you can join a moving and hauling service
in your area, or if you have a
van or a truck, you can go independent and advertise moving and hauling services on your own, which is how the company Man with a
Van started
out.
And those conditions later on their life, could turn
out to be very difficult,» Pieter
van der Does, CEO
of Adyen, told CNBC
in a TV interview.
It may seem like a guy who tools around his home base
of Los Angeles
in a white
van emblazoned with «1 -800-Autopsy» — and a guy who, as a side gig, sells couches made
out of coffins — would be a sucker for attention.
In the trailer, Brad kicks the gun
out of someone's hand, throws a man into the side
of a
van, fires a gun, and screams.
TokenLot, a company that Confido hired to host its initial coin offering, said
in a statement on Medium that it is trying to figure
out the identities
of van Doorn and the Confido team.
On the one hand, if our Sienna drove into one
of those potholes, I knew it would not get back
out, and on the other hand, if we drove over one
of the giant boulders
in the road, I knew it would rip the underside off our
van.
Relying on intelligence dossiers prepared meticulously by his UDR commanders, he prepared intensively, making several dry runs by following the bread delivery
van in which Hackett would ultimately die; he blocked
out the reality that the target might be a family man with a pregnant wife and child awaiting his return home from work; he avoided reading the papers or listening to TV reports over the next days, because the stories tend to make a real human being
out of what had to be thought
of only as «the target.»
Typologies
of religious charisma (founder, prophet, priest, etc.) as outlined by Max Weber, A. Causse, G.
van der Leeuw and J. Wach, should be worked
out in much the greater detail.
The first time we could leave
in the
van so we loaded more
of our water and food before we left but we still had to be
out in under 15 minutes before the smoke cloud with the chemical
in it reached our home.
In his significant work Christianity in World History, a prominent theologian Arend Theodor van Leeuwen has argued that the idea of separating out the things of God from the things of people in such a way as to deny the divine nature of kingship was first formulated in ancient Israel and then became a major motif of Christianit
In his significant work Christianity
in World History, a prominent theologian Arend Theodor van Leeuwen has argued that the idea of separating out the things of God from the things of people in such a way as to deny the divine nature of kingship was first formulated in ancient Israel and then became a major motif of Christianit
in World History, a prominent theologian Arend Theodor
van Leeuwen has argued that the idea
of separating
out the things
of God from the things
of people
in such a way as to deny the divine nature of kingship was first formulated in ancient Israel and then became a major motif of Christianit
in such a way as to deny the divine nature
of kingship was first formulated
in ancient Israel and then became a major motif of Christianit
in ancient Israel and then became a major motif
of Christianity.
When Wendy and I moved to Denver, our first day there my wallet and my laptop computer was stolen
out of our moving
van while it was parked
in the church parking lot.
[34]
In an article entitled «The Concept of Conversion in the Ecumenical Movement: A Historical and Documentary Survey», [35] Ans van der Bent points out that «the time is overdue for the church to examine its doctrine of conversion carefully and to subject its language to the test of both theological and psychological enquiry.&raqu
In an article entitled «The Concept
of Conversion
in the Ecumenical Movement: A Historical and Documentary Survey», [35] Ans van der Bent points out that «the time is overdue for the church to examine its doctrine of conversion carefully and to subject its language to the test of both theological and psychological enquiry.&raqu
in the Ecumenical Movement: A Historical and Documentary Survey», [35] Ans
van der Bent points
out that «the time is overdue for the church to examine its doctrine
of conversion carefully and to subject its language to the test
of both theological and psychological enquiry.»
He next moves on to a consideration
of the method he proposes for his non-religious theology, and it turns
out to be a certain species
of linguistic analysis, but the theological context within which
van Buren puts his method to work is, after all, that created by Bultmann and his demythologizing project, and
van Buren very clearly sees the sense
in which Bultmann, taken seriously, means the end
of the rhetoric
of neo-orthodoxy and the so - called biblical theology.
The linguistic and biblicist vetos have been seen to be both arbitrary and unwarranted — which makes it all the more pathetic that Dr Paul
van Buren
in The Secular Meaning
of the Gospel still seems to accept them as valid and to rule
out «God - statements» as «meaningless» while at the same time his excessive Barthian christocentrism and bibliocentrism turns the patent intention
of scriptural statement into a parody
of their proper meaning.
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock
of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said
in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy
of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of their wages.
In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread
out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor
in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk
of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting
out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting
in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut
in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic
in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support
out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest
of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for
vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work
of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the KINGDOM
OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
Man United are ready to offer $ 70m (# 51m) for the Stadio Olimpico duo and with Michael Carrick entering the latter stages
of his career, Marouane Fellaini working more effectively
in an advanced attacking role and loaned
out midfielder Tom Cleverley likely to be sold outright, there is scope for strengthening this area
of van Gaal's squad also.
The arrivals
of Radamel Falcao and Angel di Maria have left
van Gaal with «too many cooks» when filling rolls
in his attack and his midfield diamond and the former Chelsea man is seen as the odd man
out.
Mata was United's big signing
in the last January transfer window but, despite the odd impressive performance, both David Moyes and Louis
van Gaal have thus far struggled to bring the best
out of the former Valencia man within their respective systems.
Jaap
van Lagen finished just four seconds away from the winner -
in most races this would usually mean being on the podium (or at least very close to it), but the field were so closely that he was only 11th - and
out of the points!
United could do with new additions
in the middle
of the park after missing
out on several big - name targets
in that area during the summer, and Khedira now looks to be one
of Louis
van Gaal's main targets
in that part
of the pitch.
Out of the six players whose contracts are set to expire at the end
of the campaign, goalkeeper Edwin
van der Sar is widely expected to hang up his gloves while injury riddled midfielder Owen Hargreaves is thought to be
in line not to receive a new deal.
Failure to toe the line, and there could be even further additions added to Louis
van Gaal's list
of those left
out in the cold.
Louis
van Gaal was booed off as he walked down the tunnel after watching his side bore the hell
out of their supporters during a lucky 1 - 0 win over Sheffield United
in the FA Cup on Saturday.
Indeed, the Red Devils were dumped
out of this year's competition
in the group stage, and
van Gaal, showing few
of the qualities that won him two Spanish titles at Barcelona, the Champions League at Ajax, and the Bundesliga with Bayern Munich, appears unable to help the side re-qualify for the competition this season.
Having signed the likes
of Angel Di Maria and many more during the summer,
van Gaal could now trim down his squad a little further as some big names also look to be heading
out of the club before come
in.
The Belgian international, who enjoyed a superb breakthrough
in United's first - team last season, has found himself increasingly
out of favour this term under new manager Louis
van Gaal and now hopes to be allowed to move this winter.
Knocked
out again by Barcelona
in the Champions League but the Gunners beat them at the Emirates and were
in a great position at the Nou Camp until the sending off
of Robin
van Persie.
Anderson was shipped
out on loan to Fiorentina
in the second half
of last season, and with no clubs wanting to sign the former international permanently during the summer, he's languishing
in the shadows under new United boss Louis
van Gaal.
Louis
van Gaal is keen to bring
in a fresh central striking weapon and has set his sights on Bacca and with Colombia having now been knocked
out of the Copa America one imagines the push to sign the La Liga marksman will only grow.
After setting numerous scoring records
in MLS this past year, the former Juventus star will be
out of work until the 2016 season starts
in the spring — which leaves plenty
of time for Louis
van Gaal to sign him on a loan and then convince him to stay.
This fine form has attracted interest from Arsenal, though it looks like Arsene Wenger's quotes ruling
out a move for Vidal could put United
in the driving seat again as
van Gaal also looks to strengthen
in the middle
of the park.
Viera and
van persie, also seen as top talents
in their respective leagues, credit to Wenger to scout them out and give them the platform to perform In summary, this repost isn't to knock Wenger down but I feel Wenger is given far too much credit for things he shouldn't (eg building of the emirates, I haven't seen pics of him carrying the bricks with which the stadium was built though
in their respective leagues, credit to Wenger to scout them
out and give them the platform to perform
In summary, this repost isn't to knock Wenger down but I feel Wenger is given far too much credit for things he shouldn't (eg building of the emirates, I haven't seen pics of him carrying the bricks with which the stadium was built though
In summary, this repost isn't to knock Wenger down but I feel Wenger is given far too much credit for things he shouldn't (eg building
of the emirates, I haven't seen pics
of him carrying the bricks with which the stadium was built though).
Depressed I am just sick
of it pass pass pass and no end product same old same old and when losing a game I don't take off ur goal scorer even for half a chance and bellerin is waste space should been mertsacker
in def and kolisinic lab and ox rwb and how we miss cazorla, one free and one striker and no champions league football oh how we're trying very hard get bk
in haha joke
of board ambition is sad we need atleast 2 players
van diik and nzonzi would give us steel over and
out need?
The Daily Express reports that both men could be on the way
out of Old Trafford
in the summer, with Falcao returning to AS Monaco and
van Persie exiting after just three seasons at the club.
The Belgian international, who made a terrific impression upon being introduced to the first - team setup last season, has seemingly fallen
out of favour under new manager Louis
van Gaal this season, and may now be farmed
out on loan
in the new year.
Ruud
van Nistelrooy was sold by Sir Alex Ferguson after he kicked Cristiano Ronaldo
out of frustration
in Manchester United training, Guillem Balague has revealed via the Metro.
Who cares spurs prop beat them anyway we are falling giant
in bits everywhere team to da owners to da manager always up to da fans, club needs a big name someone who Sanchez will say hey great signing I'm staying I believe
in this project but same shit every year some fans still think we're great and hope it be this year haha I no the way it is ahwell we go anfield and win haha draw be good result we're already playing catch up to Jose but they no we're no treat we're prop behind Everton like Jesé who scored yesterday could play for us but we got Walcott or ozil even thou I thought Ozick did some good play but to weak gives up easy I honestly think if we lose Liverpool da house will fall down everywhere we need top defender and steel
in midfield and we need right winger I say
van diik and nzonzi if not nzonzi go get hamsik worldy player he is and go get wolfed zaha if not him Carracci
of Atlanta Madrid load
out there handily is da player we should get thou wat lift he give us
The Saints will have a slender lead to protect
in the second leg, as Redknapp picked
out Virgil
van Dijk as one
of their star performers after the Dutchman produced a dominant display.
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are
in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most
of our 5 transfers were covered by
out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold
in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming
in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm
of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed
of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe
van persie and all other structured deals
in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend
of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
so a player who feels what and how the fans feel about the mediocrity
of the club is now slated to be bigger than the club... wenger spent a donkey years at the club and won nothing yet he stays
in fat contracts and yet he is not bigger than the club, remember last season when he complained that the salaries
of the emirates workers was affecting the club transfer... imagine what a joke arsenal has become... admin pls think
of something better to write about and leave sanchez
out of this...
van pussy was a legend...
Asene needs to clear
out d dead woods, add chambers and 30m to sign
van dirk, sell walcott and sign mahrez or asensio, add cocuelin to 20m to get seri, sell debuch, jenko, perez, gibbs.keep Sanchez and mezut, and start d season.with d return
of santi later
in winter, and d competition Wilshere will bring to ramsey and xhaka, and d introduction
of giroud
in secnd half and d form
of mezut and Sanchez, and d rotation
of mahrez, seri, etc den arsenal will hav too much for epl, and may win d league.but wenger won't sign, and may even sell Sanchez, ox, mezut, and will end up with failure, afterall its his calling, his a specialist.thank
There could be three coming
in and three heading
out of Manchester United before the end
of the summer, with Louis
van Gaal ready to fine - tune his squad.
Whether draxler or not arsenal is still a weaker team, is it something bad if we have both draxler and Sanchez
in the same team fighting for places, just imagine
van persie, Sanchez, ozil, carzola are
in the same team, with likes
of inform konsieny, mustafi, and konlansinic, and good holding midfider,... our problem with this 343 information or 3421 information apart from Wenger playing players
out of position we don't have a strong holdmidfider that retrieve the ball back when we lost possession... Kant's is perfect example
of that, look at the job he does at Chelsea is amazing...... without a good holding midfielder our defenders are vulnerable
With Louis
van Gaal's side somewhat short
of options
in midfield last season as Michael Carrick spent a lot
of time
out injured and new players like Ander Herrera and Daley Blind took time to settle, it's clear that Schneiderlin could make a fine addition
in that key position.
van Gaal spoke to Sky Sports after the game and hit
out at his team's failure to cope with the Swans» change
of formation for a brief spell
in the second half:
So to get him
in and
out of practice, they hired a security
van to drive him.
Garay is one
of a number
of players to have taken a route into European football from South America via Portuguese football and the 28 year - old was dominant
in the Primeira Liga for a number
of years, but his move to Zenit went through before
van Gaal was officially installed at Old Trafford so they missed
out on a key target.
I have been reading comments
of fans on here, especially those who have chosen to appreciate the average
in ability that a striker like giroud possess, my question for ya all is, when did arsenal become a team so low on profile to sing praise
of a striker who no one can rank among the top 3 striker
in the league, I have seen an arsenal team with a striking force with players like, anelka, Wright, Henry, v persie, no one can rank giroud or whatever his name is
in the category
of my mentioned strikers.we all have got to face it, giroud is not good enough to be leading the attack
of a team dreaming
of winning the league, and Henry is right saying arsenal can't win the league with giroud as our striker,,, check this
out, man u won league titles with strikers like Rooney,
van nisteroy, v persie, man city won with aguero, Chelsea with drogba and now Costa, giroud stand no chance against any
of those.let's stop appreciating mediocrity, wenger should get us a good striker as giroud is damn too average for arsenal