It's almost as if some folks believe that the environmental protections put in place over recent decades in the West are due to some sort of inherent «special sauce», rather than as the outcomes of historical processes arising
out of human nature.
For others, the desire to predict is borne
out of human nature, which puts a premium on certainty.
If one's hopes and faith are pinned on the here and now, on the faith that reading, arithmetic, and morals will develop naturally
out of human nature, then that faith may gradually decline when this world continually drips its disappointments.
In this life, God does not lift the Christian
out of human nature, and God does not reveal himself beyond any shadow of doubt.
Not exact matches
As a result, many people believe Carson is a flat -
out mass murderer - not a hero who beautifully blended care for
human health and nonhuman
nature in one
of the most important and challenging books
of the 20th century.
«We make a big deal about the controversial
nature of our business and market around it,» explains Biderman, pointing
out that the thousands
of user profiles on Avid's various international sites represent, in the aggregate, a vast sociological study
of human infidelity, an area that has traditionally attracted little in the way
of sociological scrutiny.
In a fascinating post on The Conversation blog, Maynard makes an argument that won't surprise anyone who has read any fictional account
of human's interplanetary future — colonizing other planets probably won't bring
out the better angels
of our
nature, and any attempt to put people on Mars will require overcoming serious social and political problems, such as:
It's a part
of human nature to wonder if there is something better
out there.
Sometimes, we tend to forget that putting words
out through a computer can rob us
of our
human voices; one way to reclaim a jovial
nature is to use emojis and emoticons.
Human nature being what it is, even if you're dedicated to taking emotion
out of your investing, you're likely still subject to inherent biases.
Also, trading often requires one to react in a way which is adverse to
human nature, to be
out ahead
of the crowd, sometimes with little on which to base the decision.
Therefore, despite being contrary to
human nature, it is prudent to rebalance periodically moving money from those managers whose strategies are outperforming to those who are
out of favor and underperforming.
Forasmuch as each man is a part
of the
human race, and
human nature is something social, and has for a great and natural good, the power also
of friendship; on this account God willed to create all men
out of one, in order that they might be held in their society not only by likeness
of kind, but also by bond
of kindred.
Homer: «It's
human nature to try to weasel
out of things.
With God
out of the picture, now we have to ask «what in Hell is wrong with
human nature.»
This
human covenant, in its fidelity and indissoluble bonding, fulfils every natural and complementary quality between the sexual
natures of the spouses, as John Paul II has brought
out for us.
The whole divine -
human experience
of God's taking on
human nature in one person is an exemplar
of suffering that works itself
out in multiple dimensions
of obedience.
He pointed
out how, because
of the dominant reductionist view
of human nature, scientists are increasingly tempted to treat the
human individual as «an object to be investigated, measured and experimented upon» rather than as an «irreducible subject».
concerning his Son, who was born
of the seed
of David [as far as his
human nature went], but who was marked
out as the Son
of God with power [by the holy Spirit] through resurrection from the dead — Jesus Christ our Lord.»
Cultural anthropology shows
human nature as it grows
out of the matrix
of integral
human communities.
The cognitive dissonance it inspires brings
out the best and the worst
of human nature — a concept that is flabbergasting to Naturalists as religious faith, by its very definition is unquantifiable, unprovable and totally subjectice.
If these sciences are to afford valuable insights into
human nature, they must be broadened to include philosophical considerations growing
out of the critical scrutiny
of science and technology as
human undertakings.
It means making sense
out of the relations that
human beings and other living things have toward the overall patterns
of nature in ways that give us some sense
of their proper relations to one another, to ourselves, and to the whole» (Toulmin, 272).
Whitehead did work
out a complex theory
of value, but my point here is only to indicate that Whitehead's way
of understanding
human beings as part
of nature both requires that we extend the ethical discussion and gives us clues as to how to do this.
Underlying this erroneous tendency, as Faith has pointed
out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial
of the transcendence
of God, the Divinity
of Christ, the historical objectivity
of revelation and the authority
of the Church in matters
of faith and morals, and also the denial
of the spiritual soul as a principle
of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity
of our
human nature.
Let us speak
of a whole life
of sufferings or
of some person whom
nature, from the very outset, as we
humans are tempted to say, wronged, someone who from birth was singled
out by useless suffering: a burden to others; almost a burden to himself; and yes, what is worse, to be almost a born objection to the goodness
of Providence.
With a certain simplification
of the state
of affairs, which however brings
out more clearly the decisive factor without falsifying it, we might say that formerly the object and situation
of a man's action were simply data supplied by
nature with which he was in contact and by simple
human realities which recurred from generation to generation again and again.
It is certainly true, as he points
out, that any strong separation
of the
human and the natural is false to the facts, as
nature comes mixed with
human interaction, and
humans are inextricably biological in any case.
Birch and Cobb propose that to live
out such an ethic one must act personally and politically to promote two complementary ideals: ecological sustainability in our relations to the rest
of nature, and social justice among
humans.
The church therefore would seem to have much to offer the New Urbanist enterprise
out of its own long intellectual and spiritual traditions — not least a serious and sophisticated view
of human nature and
human community, a pastoral mandate to serve rich and poor, and a long history
of urban and architectural patronage.
Though much
of today's science is applied science — the: discovery
of new processes and the making
of new products to satisfy
human wants — it all rests on the desire to find
out with certainty what can be known about the world
of nature.
I know there are going to be a bunch
of people
out there that scream that God can do anything and could create a sinless Child, but you can not ignore the
HUMAN nature of Jesus, so unless God created something other than human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original
HUMAN nature of Jesus, so unless God created something other than
human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original
human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his
human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original
human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original Sin.
In yesterday's post we saw that Scripture and theology seems to indicate that in some way
humans were enabled by God to guide and control natural forces, but when we sinned, we lost this ability, and
nature spun
out of control.
It's just common,
human nature to look, as well as, normal
human reflexes to look
out of first curiosity, and then feel very uncomfortable and try not to look knowing consciously in your mind what is taking place.
While classification freed directors to use explicit language in marvelous films like Platoon and Something Wild and has allowed films like
Out of Africa and Children
of a Lesser God to explore the complex
nature of human sexuality, it has also given us a series
of slasher films — Friday the 13th, with its many parts; The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, parts one and two — and films like Brian DePalma's artistically significant but deplorably explicit Body Double.
Elsewhere, Berger elaborates by pointing
out that religions provide legitimation and meaning in a distinctly «sacred» mode, that they offer claims about the
nature of ultimate reality as such, about the location
of the
human condition in relation to the cosmos itself.
I would point
out, however, that billions
of other
human beings, in every time and place, have had similar experiences â $ «but they had them while thinking about Krishna, or Allah, or the Buddha, while making art or music, or while contemplating the sheer beauty
of nature.
Yet the Christian affirms that God is distilling love, goodness, truth, beauty, and righteousness
out of the changes and chances
of nature and
human existence.
For John Paul, socialism turned
out the way it did — anti-growth, anti-
human, and anti-worker — because it was based on a false understanding
of human nature.
«44 Yet over against
human activity, the role
of nature stands
out as the focus
of the agricultural parables
of Jesus.
No doubt the church has been right in acknowledging the deity
of Christ and the Incarnation as the fullest measure
of the divine revelation
of which
human nature is capable; though it should be pointed
out that the church as a rule undertook to stand fast and to hold the ground
of the traditional, historical faith, enshrined in the New Testament, and — as the histories
of dogma make clear - only took over metaphysical definitions which had already been hammered
out on the anvils
of logical and exegetical disputation.
Ward examines this question in chapter 8, where he points
out that in Judaism and Christianity morality is inspired by a vision
of a God
of supreme goodness, whose
nature is meant to be reflected in
human society, and whose final goal is «the transfiguration
of the cosmos by a fully realised personal unity with God».
This means that, on Holloway's perspective, they also flow
out of the structure
of nature and
of human society as it is fulfilled in the direct and personal enfleshment
of God the Son.
The theology
of nature is that God created
nature, but it fell
out of control when
humans sinned.
In The Great Disruption:
Human Nature and the Reconstitution
of Social Order, Francis Fukuyama says our society went seriously
out of whack in the 1960s, chiefly because
of the change in sexual roles and in employment patterns forced by the rise
of the information revolution.
His doctrine
of two separate substances, extended matter and thinking mind, each sort
of substance requiring, with God bracketed
out of the picture, nothing other than itself in order to exist, rather unceremoniously threw mind, that is, distinctively
human being,
out of nature and left philosophy with the hopeless task
of trying to figure
out how a mind outside
of nature, a mind not
of nature, could ever really come to know
nature.
The Renaissance, the other wing that came
out of the breakup
of the medieval synthesis, saw
human nature only as a realm
of limitless possibilities.
Out of this movement, a vision
of the cosmos is emerging that is at once more purposeful, more respectful
of the mysteries
of nature, and more cognizant
of the limitations
of the
human mind in attempting to comprehend it.
In the unceasing
human striving from the good to the better, in the contempt
of the base and mean, in the universal homage to the true and noble and unselfish, there was, for Israel's thought, just as for ours, a profound mystery that compelled speculation to venture beyond the immediate and tangible,
out into the region
of cause and
nature and being.
We may pause to ponder, that while these royal morons disported themselves in beastly passion in Antioch and Alexandria, a petty hill town
of their domains, age - old Jerusalem, followed its Temple services that went their quiet way, day after day, year in and year
out; and there, groups
of thoughtful men reflected upon the
nature of human life, reasoning that «The fear
of the Lord is the beginning
of wisdom,» that «The law
of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul,» or fervently ejaculated, «Oh, how I love thy law!