Sentences with phrase «out of nothing much»

Julia Opie's Pine Forest, meanwhile, creates dense woodland out of nothing much at all.

Not exact matches

One day of «un-shopping» may not have much of an impact in itself, but «if we stop and think about it for a day, we might find out that we're more deeply tangled in the dragnet of consumerism,» says the Buy Nothing Day website.
There's nothing dumb about keeping a limited pool of money in checking — enough for emergencies, but not so much you lose out on important investments and savings.
Ad tech firms are out of favor these days - too many players, too many unmet promises, too little transparency, too few successes, and too much money for nothing much to talk about in the way of results.
But people that reject him, they get a much simplier view, they get odds like no atoms right out of any atoms to pick from, even one... they get nothing... you for instance... nothing.
Also, i guess a living zombie, a snake, a rib woman, a magical tree does sound strange... i find it much easier to believe in a cosmic event that produced life out of nothing one day and that we slowly evolved from animals into human beings.
In a New York Times blog, Ross Douthat notes that Pew created two nonbeliever categories instead of one: the much publicized atheist / agnostic category (which got 21 out of 32 religious knowledge questions right) and a much larger category of respondents who described their religion as «nothing in particular» (which got only 15 right — a bit below the national average of 16 correct answers).
I do nt get to socialize with gays much... I know many personally... just do nt socialize with them... had one who was a roomate and we did not know he was gay till after he was arrested and moved out for fraud (he was a pathological liar - had nothing to do with his being gay) he pretty much avoided me cause of his being found out to have lied and cost me and another roomate s thousands of dollars in hpne calls that he blamed my best friend on, etc etc..
No, lets assume there are no gods, or nothing that would fit your descrition of god since the likely hood of weither of those options is much higher (given that yours is ONE possibility... YOUR definition of YOUR god... out of an infinite number.
Actually, djlockerthebrain if you look at the university scientifically you will realize that the very first molecule was created by something much bigger than you or me because you can't create something out of nothing!.
Corrections please,,, My say as a human to human, from brother to a brother derived from our father and mother Adam & Eve, kindly ask your American Nation to unite all races and faiths under one ceiling and not to Crash down otherwise it will go back to pieces and fragments of pieces, we are here with you on the Ship, Ark still can feel and suffer the results of the vibrations that has reached us since the 9/11 tragedy and the following Global Economy Crash and we do not want those any more as much as you do but nothing we ordinary ones can do other than be heard complaining and that what we are doing here right now where I am to Remind out of but have no Control Over.?!
Yes, because the notion that the Universe created itself out of nothing is so much more credible.
@Vic After hundreds of hours of examination under an electron microscope, the much lauded Dino soft tissue turned out to be nothing more than 10,000 year old pond sc.um.
Of course, for someone who believes that God can and does create out of nothing, recreating or reconstituting the ashes of a person would not seem to be that much of a probleOf course, for someone who believes that God can and does create out of nothing, recreating or reconstituting the ashes of a person would not seem to be that much of a probleof nothing, recreating or reconstituting the ashes of a person would not seem to be that much of a probleof a person would not seem to be that much of a probleof a problem.
only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!
My say as a human to human, from brother to a brother derived from our father and mother Adam & Eve, kindly ask your American Nation to unite all races and faiths under one ceiling and not to Crash down otherwise it will go back to pieces and fragments of pieces, we are here with you on the Ship, Ark still can feel and suffer the results of the vibrations that has reached us since the 9/11 tragedy and the following Global Economy Crash and we do not want those any more as much as you do but nothing we ordinary ones can do other than be heard complaining and that what we are doing here right now where I am to Remind out of but have no Control Over.?!
They've crafted a virtually perfect album out of unlikely parts, and nothing stands out about it as much as its expertise.
But it's also the unreal, the unseen, the you - feel - it - but - can't - say - it of times of creative quiet: I'm empty and I'm tired, I have nothing from which to pull the water out of the well, there isn't a bucket or a scooper and even if I could find one, I suspicion that there isn't much in the bottom of this old well right now.
The devil himself is largely responsible for much of the violence that happens in the world, and he loves nothing more than to carry out that violence and then frame God for it.
On the other hand, attempts to construct a picture of the historical Jesus have been fraught with personal biases to the extent that Jesus the first century Palestinian often comes out resembling nothing so much as the ideal nineteenth century European liberal or twentieth century American conservative or twenty - first century third world radical, depending upon who is constructing this «historical» picture.
And although earlier apocalyptic conceptions are generally missing in the Fourth Gospel, as we have already had occasion to observe, traces of this idea of Christ's victory are to be found even there; as in 14:30: «Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in me»; in 16:11: «The prince of this world is judged»; and in 12:31: «Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.»)
Moreover, by such a speech he would fall out of the rôle of the paradox, and if he really wanted to speak to Isaac, he must transform his situation into a temptation (Anfechtung), for otherwise he could say nothing, and if he were to do that, then he is not even so much as a tragic hero.
hating a good man who's done nothing but try to help the country out of a horrible mess and spreading lies about him is pretty much the opposite of how these people's «savior» said they should act.
If the Church has nothing to say that challenges, remakes, upbuilds human life, it is only a respectable and semidecadent human institution, and nothing to worry much about if it goes out of business.
While there's still much learning to be done, I have found the light in teh grace of Jesus Go out and do real research if you're truly intersted in learning and gaining knowledge, posting stupid arguments on these boards accomplishes nothing and only shows people's willful ignorance.
Vast numbers of people think that the fact of a relatively settled order of nature, along with the scientific interpretation of change and the description of the inner dynamics of human personality (and much else as well), has ruled out once and for all genuine novelty and made change nothing more than the reshuffling of bits of matter - in - motion.
Jeremy I agree its not about what we can do but all about what Jesus has done for us it is all about his grace not following mans laws or trying to please the pastor or the church.Be respectful for those in authority and show them Gods love work hard as for the Lord as you serve them and pray for them but do nt try and please them.We no longer follow the ways of the world we live to please the Lord and worship him not man because that is idolatory.Thats why religion does nt work we can do nothing to add to Gods grace.Grace is also not a licence to sin as some christians believe and God is not fooled if we do not repent and turn from our sin he does nt hear our prayers if the intents of our heart are wrong.God listens to the humble and the repentent sinner or saint.The journey in following Christ is about how much do we want to follow Jesus to discover the abundant life and richs in Christ we must fully give him all our hearts and serve him wholehearted out of thankfulness for his grace and mercy towards us.brentnz
15:24 - 28), but we don't know much about this event, so it might be a completely new creation out of nothing (ex nihilo).
But in fact, the devil himself is largely responsible for much of the violence that happens in the world, and he loves nothing more than to carry out that violence and then frame God for it.
However, know that sniffing out only the stories of greed and abuse in the church while ignoring all the stories of actual progress for society that it brings pretty much negates all of your arguments to that of an obsessed critic with nothing better to do than make up facts against the church.
Much of the western tradition in literature and science was generated out of a «church» that is nothing like what you portray.
Since we still have so much to learn who knows that it's utterly impossibly to create something out of nothing.
I sat there on the bed for a while, and then I did seek out my brother and apologize to him, and we all sat down quietly for lunch, and nothing else was ever said about this, until now, in this small essay; but the thought occurs to me that in a lot of ways I have been sitting on that bed ever since, pondering the way lies come so easily to our lips and spin so easily out of our ostensible control, and stab the innocent, and dilute respect, and poison love, and tear at what we so much wish to be, which is honest and gracious and reverent.
For those of you that don't know me, I'm Chef Dennis and it's my great pleasure today to be here with you today and share a new cookie recipe with you.I have to start out by saying that while I'm not really a baker, it is something that I truly enjoy doing.While I have made my fair share of cakes and pies, cookies are one treat that has eluded me.I do have my one go to cookie, courtesy of Alice Medrich, but I've pretty much beaten that one into the ground this year, and I knew I needed to expand my cookie repertoire.I started going through my cookbooks looking for inspiration, there were so many wonderful cookies to choose from, but in the end I decided upon a cookie that I had seen in my wife's December edition of Real Simple.The cover of the issue simply stated «30 impressive make - ahead cookies» and as I looked through the magazine, nothing really grabbed me and then I turned the page to the last cookie, and there it was.......
Lay the cookies out on a foil lined sheet (make sure it's small enough to fit under the broiler if your broiler's in the bottom of the oven) and top with a square or two of chocolate followed by a marshmallow and broil for about a minute, making sure nothing catches on fire or burns too too much.
Nutrition highlights: There's absolutely nothing to feel guilty about when it comes to this recipe, and I actually can't think of a much more balanced breakfast option out there.
We're just eeking out of the first trimester, but I'm still struggling with lots of food aversion, pretty much nothing sounds good.
Like another reviewer here commented (Petra) there was nothing quick about this 22 minute chicken masala... By the time I was finished washing, slicing, cutting and cooking everything I was in about 3 hours... I doubled this recipe... It came out very good looking just like the photo at the top... Some people here commented that the recipe was bland so I added a 3/4 teaspoon of both cumin and coriander powder to the sauce... Nothing bland about this... It was on the spicy side... Not marinading the chicken in yogurt didn't make much of a difference... I used chicken tenders... When are they ever tough or chewy annothing quick about this 22 minute chicken masala... By the time I was finished washing, slicing, cutting and cooking everything I was in about 3 hours... I doubled this recipe... It came out very good looking just like the photo at the top... Some people here commented that the recipe was bland so I added a 3/4 teaspoon of both cumin and coriander powder to the sauce... Nothing bland about this... It was on the spicy side... Not marinading the chicken in yogurt didn't make much of a difference... I used chicken tenders... When are they ever tough or chewy anNothing bland about this... It was on the spicy side... Not marinading the chicken in yogurt didn't make much of a difference... I used chicken tenders... When are they ever tough or chewy anyway...
There is nothing in these brownies you couldn't eat raw (in fact, much of the batter disappeared before the pan made it to the oven) so don't be frightened to take the brownies out of the oven before a toothpick inserted into the center comes out completely clean.
All the other clubs are showing ambition and ok maybe the two aforementioned players may not be the choice for everyone, someone we can use would really be a booster for the fans, to date the two players who were feted as Marquee signings were Ozil WHO AT TIME OF PURCHASE WAS NOT EVEN GETTING INTO THE SIDE AT Reall Madrid and was very much out of favour with the German national coach and who has done next to nothing for uOF PURCHASE WAS NOT EVEN GETTING INTO THE SIDE AT Reall Madrid and was very much out of favour with the German national coach and who has done next to nothing for uof favour with the German national coach and who has done next to nothing for us.
And the machine spews out nothing but pain: the psychic toll of being told, twice a year, that the grass will be staying brown, that there's only skim left and that Karim Benzema is quite happy in Madrid, thank you very much.
Ogden does make a case for various other individuals and some may still take issue with a few of his selections, but ultimately his point about the lack of stand - out English talent is very true and although it's nothing new, it should still very much be a concern for England moving forward.
If nothing else, you'll come out of this match loving how much you hate Baron Corbin.
He left Sunday's start with a blister, which is admittedly not a big deal in the long run, but Hill has had his share of legitimate, career - altering injuries that kept him from breaking out like this as a starter until he was in his mid-30s already — it doesn't take much imagination to come up with a scenario where the A's tried to get too much and ended up getting nothing instead.
The problem is when you have an average defensive midfielder then your backline can never be at rest.Coquelin should have started this match.Some people think he's average but I feel he's been played out of position and being tasked with doing too much like a box to box player.How can someone who bases his game on tackling and interception lose that ability all of a sudden and you tell me nothing's wrong but bdcause he's average.Are we fans going to ignore what is plain to us?Let's just pretend things are alright.Then after we win the cracks will be papered only for them to be exposed another day.
Get out of Ozils backside and expect much more than he is giving to the team, there is nothing wrong with that.
On a final note, bar a few transfer stories sucked out of the tip of the writers fingers, nothing much is happening really.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Jamal Crawford Iso basketball Missed drafting Mitchell His offense His defense His out of bounds plays His in game management He fired a bunch of staff for his guys The bench is worthless Traded Rubio for nothing Signed Teague for 2 much Thibs has zero patience
Much of Green Bay's schedule has been released and so far nothing rules out the rumor that the Packers could be coming to Seattle on the weekend of Oct. 7 @ByTimBooth https://t.co/VXNXkHG5B7
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z