Sentences with phrase «out of nothing which»

But booo to the damper at Liv, I will never understand why places make a big deal out of nothing which will just leave a bad taste in prospective guests / customer's mouths.
These strikers can make something out of nothing which is why they are world class.

Not exact matches

«You've had a modest widening out of spreads but nothing that's too alarming which would indicate to us at least an early - stage credit dislocation or any financial stress,» Morganlander said.
«The miracles of technology cause us to live in a hectic, clockwork world that does violence to human biology, enabling us to do nothing but pursue the future faster and faster... Specialization in verbiage, classification, and mechanized thinking has put man out of touch with many of the marvelous powers of «instinct» which govern his body.
The message to Syrians living in opposition - controlled areas, Hof added, would be the same as it always has been: «So long as we kill you, maim you, terrorize you, and drive you from your homes with ordnance that is not chemical in nature, that which is left of a hollowed - out West will do nothing to protect you.
While his story is nothing out of the ordinary, it's one of many cases in which patient capital could have saved the day.
«There's nothing like walking from the 1st floor of a modern looking expensive, trendy restaurant until you get out of the public area and go down the creaky unpainted wooded stairs and find a basement with damp stone foundation walls, puddles of water on the ground, and a crew of people cooking soup in a 10 gallon pot which is on the ground at the time.»
Sometimes saying nothing is better than saying something, which is certainly the case when it comes to promoting an out of date award.
I said nothing of the sort, I only pointed out that census data was misused by Nazis for their own evil purposes, as it was misused by the American government (and possibly the Canadian government) for the purposes of interning their citizens of Japanese descent (which, to the credit of the US Census bureau, it has apologized for).
In the mean time, I contacted the FBI and the postal inspector, both of which referred me to an online complaint form, which I filled out and heard nothing back from.
In an environment of risk aversion (which we currently infer on the basis of clear breakdowns in market internals) and credit spreads blowing out to multi-year highs, Fed easing has typically done nothing to support stock prices (see When An Easy Fed Doesn't Help Stocks).
These fake gold products have siphoned funds away from real, physical gold, which can not be created out of the nothing the way the imposter electronic gold products can be.
Barhydt went on to point out that ICOs effectively replace the «friends and family» round of traditional funding, which is usually based on nothing more than a whitepaper.
If you do nothing, your position is highly likely to finish out of the money, at which point you've lost your investment amount.
Well guys it is Hell already here on earth endless killings worldwide... Back here where I am Ye is already heading towards that the whole country is on demonstrations demanding resignation of the ruler but he seems unwilling to resign before the end of his ruling period on 2013, while the streets are demanding immediate resignation and that has caused bloodshed in every city in the country... the streets demonstrations has enforced civil strikes all over the country which is now paralyzed... no cash with the banks all money frozen in the central bank... My business is in the field of services therefore I find my self now obliged to dismiss part of my staff in order to be able to survive this unfortunate thing... Already have reduced working hour to one shift to reduce running cost... so you see am now sitting alone in the whole building of our business office writing here as nothing can be done to carry on business even if there is business... Just I pray these unfortunate events passes over soon before it becomes out of control as had happened in Libya... we have nothing to say but (Ina - Lilah - WaIna - Alih - Ragoon) & (Alhmed - Lilah for every thing)... «Mankind has always been Hasty while God has always been the most Patient»...
Lott (the righteous) offers his two v - i - r - g - i - n daughters to the unruly crowd to Genesis 19:9 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
In a New York Times blog, Ross Douthat notes that Pew created two nonbeliever categories instead of one: the much publicized atheist / agnostic category (which got 21 out of 32 religious knowledge questions right) and a much larger category of respondents who described their religion as «nothing in particular» (which got only 15 right — a bit below the national average of 16 correct answers).
Once God is accepted as the first cause of everything which happens in the mortal world, nothing is left to chance... logic can be happily tossed out the window.»
2) so... you read the Bible, which begins with God merely speaking and * everything * is made out of * nothing * (including humanity)... but your objection is «where did Jesus» Y - chromosome come from»?
Believers laugh at the idea the universe could come into being out of nothing, but have no problem with the idea of a magical being for which there is no evidence creating it out of nothing.
It's simply one of hundreds, likely thousands of misunderstandings of ancient texts, which were mistranslated and hijacked later for assorted purposes, and taken out of their original cultural context, and used to suit a later worldview, which had nothing to do with their original meaning and iintent.
For process theology it is important to show that the «nothing» out of which the Big Bang occurred was not simply nothing.
Basically, reversals are all about processes that are going on in the core not the rest of the Earth, which really doesn't care what the magnetic field looks like.Tawny as I say in my post, my theory» is that nothing particularly out of the ordinary is happening, with the die - offs or the magnetic field, whatever the buzz around these events.
Kekes» example of religiously inspired atrocities is the thirteenth - century Catholic Church's crusade against the Cathars, which wiped them out — along with many who had little or nothing to do with them.
This universe had an start, a point at which all matter in the universe and time itself was created, out of nothing (where nothing is the «absence of everything»).
I think of Incarnation in terms of something out of nothing — that which gives rise to the perceptible realm.
I certainly appreciate your confidence in me, but here's the thing: There's a double - standard out there in which a woman's critique of patriarchy tends to get discounted as nothing more than the rants of an «angry feminist,» and, truth be told, I've grown a bit weary of hearing that charge each time I speak out about this disturbing trend in the evangelical church.
when the journeying is begun, it is as if he wandered out into a strange land where nothing but the contrast with what he has lost reminds him of that which he wished for.
We got out of the way before we could find out what happened (and I've searched the internet to see if there was any news, but nothing appears, which I'm hoping is a good sign), but the sight left us numb and shaky.
Russ, you said, «while it is a «huge leap» (as you say) to claim the specificity of the Judeo - Christian God in this particular finding, how is it not * equally * (if not more so) a leap to filter out the concept of transcendence (which you call a «self - contained oxymoron»), without any alternate explanation for the paradoxical «something out of nothing» origins of our universe?»
It could still be a steady state universe which actually doesn't explode out of nothing and then expand in an accelerated manner into an eternal cold and dark void.
while it is a «huge leap» (as you say) to claim the specificity of the Judeo - Christian God in this particular finding, how is it not * equally * (if not more so) a leap to filter out the concept of transcendence (which you call a «self - contained oxymoron»), without any alternate explanation for the paradoxical «something out of nothing» origins of our universe?
«Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good without qualification, except a good will.»
Brumbaugh explains how these stages can get out of proper order, leaving the student stuck at one stage from which nothing else follows.
His other challenge came out of my major moral claim, that any serious effort to reduce emissions by any significant amount, let alone the 60 - 80 % called for by the European Union and some of our presidential candidates, would destroy economies all over the world and condemn the poor to perpetual poverty - which is why China and India will have nothing to do with emissions caps.
There is no way in Hell (which there is one) you can convince any logical thinking person (myself included) that my ancestors crawled out of the ocean and somehow magically grew arms and legs from nothing and decided to live on land just «because».
The KJ song that you lash out at shows that you know nothing about the Biblical account of a woman who brought her most valuable possession, an Alabaster Box, in which she broke open and bathed the feet of Jesus with her hair.
I possess nothing but the everyday out of which I am never taken.
Phillips Brooks put it once in unforgettable words: «To keep clear of concealment, to keep clear of the need of concealment, to do nothing which he might not do out on the middle of Boston Common at noon - day, — I can not say how more and more that seems to me to be the glory of a young man's life.
But there is nothing surprising in this, for the O.T. itself spoke of a new covenant: «Behold the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers when took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant which they broke, though I was their husband, says the Lord.
All immediacy, in spite of its illusory peace and tranquillity, is dread, and hence, quite consistently, it is dread of nothing; one can not make immediacy so anxious by the most horrifying description of the most dreadful something, as by a crafty, apparently casual half word about an unknown peril which is thrown out with the surely calculated aim of reflection; yea, one can put immediacy most in dread by slyly imputing to it knowledge of the matter referred to.
It certainly is good to have finally found out that Christianity is nothing more than just tradition, ritual and culture and that all the things which the Bible says about God and prayer are not true — God does not speak to or lead or guide or direct anyone or put thoughts in anyone's mind or show them signs or speak to their heart or mind or tells them what to do or calls people or chooses people or has a plan for people's lives whether they are in an altered state of consciousness / transcendent state or whether they are in an unaltered cognitive state.
The third mark is re-surrection which Tillich is quick to remind us has nothing to do with dead bodies rising out of graves.
But it's also the unreal, the unseen, the you - feel - it - but - can't - say - it of times of creative quiet: I'm empty and I'm tired, I have nothing from which to pull the water out of the well, there isn't a bucket or a scooper and even if I could find one, I suspicion that there isn't much in the bottom of this old well right now.
I have briefly noted some aspects of modern physics, medicine, and parapsychology to point to what you probably already knew: there is nothing in our modern common sense itself which rules out our consideration of a spiritual reality.
Hartshorne was fond of pointing out that this ignores the testimony of experience which knows nothing of the total devaluing of these terms.
Goguel rightly points out that if «the resurrection was only the reversal of the undeserved fate to which Jesus had submitted and nothing more than his rehabilitation... it would not have created a new order of things.
But I think it is legitimate to point out, in reply to the view that the speeches in the early part of Acts are late compositions, that there is nothing in them which suggests that which is distinctive of Paul.
He was strongly opposed to the teaching of some of his Christian contemporaries who wished to interpret the idiom of resurrection as an allegorical description of that Christian experience by which «a man, having come to the truth, has been reanimated and revivified to God, and, the death of ignorance being dispelled, has as it were burst forth from the tomb of the old man».35 Tertullian was adamant that the resurrection was in the future and to be understood in physical, fleshly terms («I pronounce that the flesh will certainly rise again»).36 In order to forestall those who could contend the impossibility of such a hope on the grounds that the decayed corpse would have long since wasted away to nothing, he pointed out that quite recently, in his city, skeletons some five hundred years old had been unearthed in a remarkable state of preservation.
On the other hand, the general scheme, and the emphasis, correspond with what we have found in the epistles, and there is little or nothing in it which could not be documented out of the epistles, except the historical details in the introductory passage (xiii.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z