Sentences with phrase «out of our opponents defence»

Not exact matches

We have Debuchy, Sanchez, Ramsey, Wilshere, Campbell, Rosicky, Chamberlain, Walcott, Welbeck... All these players have pace and work rate, as well as technical skill, but we can't tell them to press high when they lose the ball or to bring chaos to the opponent's defence because not only do we lack cover in midfield and central defense, we also play them out of position.

As well as City doing us a favour in pressuring Chelsea, they also knocked a lot of confidence out of our next opponents Southampton, exposing their defence with three goals.

Ozil needs to be played more centrally if we hope to benefit from his creativity with the ball and Welbeck's first touch is far too sloppy to be played along side Lacazette... we need to find a formation which allows more service to those making runs from the middle of the pitch... Lacazette can not play so much with his back to goal or we're simply playing the same unsuccessful offensive scheme we played with Giroud, who is much better in that type of role... I can only hope we keep Sanchez and purchase a true defensive midfielder then switch to a 4 -4-1-1, which allows us to have Ozil play more centrally with Sead and Sanchez on the left side and Ox and Bellerin on the right, which would stretch defences so much that we could overwhelm most opponents with both runs in behind and overlapping runs out wide

With Michu's main strength being running onto a through pass played by one of Swansea's more gifted ball players such as Britton or de Guzman there may be no better opponent to play against than Arsenal with their main problem in defence as seen at White Hart Lane last week is keeping a stable and aware defensive line once they have pushed up further out of their own half.

With Maria Eagle now out of the picture as co-covenor of Labour's defence review, conflict is much less likely between Thornberry and Ken Livingstone, another opponent of Trident.

Some around Corbyn — a lifelong opponent of nuclear weapons — say that with the shadow defence secretary, Emily Thornberry, carrying out a review, the party currently has no settled policy on Trident.

With Perfect Defence, players who time their tackles perfectly are able to powerfully shove their opponent out of

With Perfect Defence, players who time their tackles perfectly are able to powerfully shove their opponent out of the way and instantly secure the ball, allowing to create direct turnarounds and counter opportunities.

Meanwhile, Submission Showdown is the opposite to Stand and Bang as all punches and kicks are removed in favour of takedowns, grappling and submission holds, although in the scenario of neither fighter being able to make their opponent tap out, a tie - breaker is introduced for one fighter to lock in their hold, while the other fighter attempts to prevent the hold from becoming tighter with the tie - breaker then reversing roles in offence and defence until one of the fighters has successfully locked in their submission hold.

This is a colourful and funky game with a soundtrack to match while you use the battle deck to build up your attack and defence while also planning ahead to swap out or glitch your opponent to your advantage (just making sure you don't ruin your build in the process of course).

In a comprehensive decision, weighing in at a hefty 391 paragraphs over 85 pages, the panel concluded that, in his defence of John B. Felderhof, Groia had indeed crossed the line from ill - considered language blurted out in the «heat of the moment,» and had engaged in a concerted and sustained barrage of personal and unwarranted attacks on his opponents that were uncivil to the point of breaching the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Whilst a Judge may initially be sympathetic if, for example, a statement of case or defence aren't in the format a lawyer would know they need to be presented in, the court is very unlikely to continue to grant leeway once an initial warning has been given, and, as another example, turning up to court to defend an application by the opponent to strike out your claim and simply arguing it wouldn't be fair to allow the application because of the overriding objective of fairness would be given short shrift.