Professor Daniel Koretz points out that there was a movement in New York City by parents to opt
out of standardized testing even before the Common Core.
Not exact matches
School administrators are closely watching a letter campaign that's taking place in the days before school starts that could lead to
even more children opting
out of state
standardized tests.
Elia is supportive
of the controversial Common Core standards,
even as thousands
of students opted
out of April's round
of standardized tests in New York.
Dissatisfaction with
standardized testing is growing in all quarters, and
even The New York Times has now recognized that parents choosing to opt their children
out of standardized tests come from a variety
of backgrounds.
This 18 minutes includes information on the educational policies supporting the history
of high - stakes
standardized tests in the U.S., how educational policymakers (including U.S. Presidents G.W. Bush and Obama) have unwaveringly «advanced» this history, how our nation's over-reliance on such
test - based policies have done nothing for our nation for the past ten years (as cited in this clip,
even though they have really done little to nothing for now more than 30 years), how and why the opt -
out movement is still sweeping the nation, and the like.
But as directed by a memo released by Commissioner Pryor's office last December, Connecticut superintendents are being told to mislead,
even lie, to any parents who seek to opt their children
out of Connecticut's misguided
standardized testing fiasco.
Rather than use that vehicle to speak
out about the misuse
of standardized testing, CABE and CAPPS signed onto a political agenda that failed to
even mention the word
testing let alone articulate a position about why the overuse
of standardized testing is unfair, discriminatory and is damaging our children and our system
of public education.
Even after the proposal was modified by the Connecticut General Assembly is still held
out as a prime example
of the corporate education reform industry's obsession with more
standardized testing and inappropriate teacher evaluation programs that utilize
standardized test results.
It doesn't create much «buzz» to point
out that
even in spite
of constantly moving targets, fluctuating «cut scores» on
standardized tests, and daily changes to state teacher evaluation systems, our teachers are better prepared than they have ever been, are being expected to do more with less, and — amazingly — are doing it.