Sentences with phrase «out of that argument because»

Pushed out of the argument because it is so impossibly incorrect is The Bell Curve by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray, which argued that IQ and other factors crucial to social success are genetically determined and are unequally distributed among racial groups.

Not exact matches

In August, Moore made a similar argument on mass shootings in the US, claiming America «asked for it,» because it has «taken God out of everything.»

A lot of stress and angst results from a sense of not being able to express how you are feeling because you are afraid of having an argument that could get out of control.

One could make a compelling argument that those expenses should not be taken all at once, but instead spread out of the period when a drug is sold because it is equivalent to buying equipment for your bakery.

I was glad to be invited, because I thought I was going to see some of these arguments thrashed out.

As my colleague Dylan Matthews points out, it's a bit of a strange argument, because even if a new NAFTA boosted US economic growth, funds for the wall would still come from US taxpayers.

These faceless bureaucrats must also be told to stop their spin about freezing Iron Dome because of the arguments they love to carry out via the media with Ministry of Finance budgetary division officials.

Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.

«Perhaps the most powerful of the pro-choice arguments,» Ms. Crandall points out, was that illegality of abortion would leave America in «the dark ages when thousands of women died because of unsafe, back - alley abortions — between five thousand and ten thousand a year was the figure usually given» in the 1970s.

The atheists are seeking out arguments about God because this is their way of getting closer to destination that they are denying themselves.

Arguments like yours are non-arguments because they try to take rationality out of the equation by attacking rationality as a basis for aArguments like yours are non-arguments because they try to take rationality out of the equation by attacking rationality as a basis for aarguments because they try to take rationality out of the equation by attacking rationality as a basis for argumentsarguments.

I just asked him to consider the fact that there are a great deal more that run contrary to his argument due in part because he has pulled verses out of context.

For the record this is one of the dumbest arguments believers throw out, because they can't begin to explain where God came from.

TL; DR: 1) A born again believer doesn't sin 100 % willfully because their Spirit is of God who hates sin 2) The indwelling of the Holy Spirit causes sanctification 3) The indwelling of the Holy Spirit can not be replaced by a try - hard theology; it has to be the real thing 4) Whoever has the Holy Spirit can not be snatched out of our Father's hand 5) We sometimes get into argument over misunderstanding, let us pray before replying and seek the Lord before judging; let us be righteous in our judgement

Hence some aethiest stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Hence some believers stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Because all of Scripture is culturally directed — i. e., because all of it was written for a particular situation and out of a particular context - the evangelical can not use the issue of culture to distinguish between arguments for women's place in marriage and her place in the Because all of Scripture is culturally directed — i. e., because all of it was written for a particular situation and out of a particular context - the evangelical can not use the issue of culture to distinguish between arguments for women's place in marriage and her place in the because all of it was written for a particular situation and out of a particular context - the evangelical can not use the issue of culture to distinguish between arguments for women's place in marriage and her place in the church.

All of these considerations do not change the fact that for a long time American society has been organized around the image of the successful white Anglo - Saxon man, nor assuage the bitterness of those excluded from the central rewards of the society because of the fact of sex or race or age.22 Plato long ago pointed out that the tyrant who can gratify every whim is the greatest slave of all, because he is completely at the mercy of his own desires, but he did not mean that argument as an excuse for tyrants.

He makes a similar argument to yours that it is ok to slaughter even infants and children, if that is what your god wants in cases where he doesn't want do do the terrible deeds himself, as he did when he supposedly wiped out almost all of humanity with a flood or sent a plague to kill 70,000 Israelites (2 Samuel 24:1 - 15), because David conducted a census, Yahweh caused him to conduct.

Other commentaries brought out how the Pharisees probably had a bit of conundrum, because Jesus didn't actually grind any herbs or use any medicine and so the argument could have been made that he had not violated the Sabbath.

It is an ignorant angle of argument, one that God is not interested in debating because He prefers to what He does best than senselessly argue: heal the sick, cast out demons, let the blind see and raise the dead.

There are reasoned arguments for belief in a higher power, but you might have to read a book to find them, because you might not find them hanging out with a bunch of atheists.

First, discussion of Intelligent Design's argument against neo-Darwinism is out of place in a high - school science classroom because most scientists working in the area do not accept the Intelligent Design criticism of neo-Darwinism and because understanding the scientific issues involves sophisticated arguments far beyond the capacity of nonspecialists, let alone high - school students.

My «out» with the conclusion of this argument is that if it is true that all choice, thought and free will is actually an illusion, then we still can't say atheism is rational, because rationality doesn't exist.

To bring up the «child» factor is simply out of line because not all hetero couples have children and if that is (as it would appear to be) part of your argument, why allow them to get married?

Now, even with hardships, even with arguments, door slamming in front of your nose, «you hate me» teen remarks... I wouldn't change it, because believe it or not there is a good side of being a mother, a side that melts you into a puddle of sweetly melted ice - cream; when they give you a hug from out of the blue and whisper in your ear «you're the best!»

some of it not so good however, because we wanted our relationship to be different from our parents, we wrote our own service and that process was incredibly valuable we had massive arguments and really thrashed out what commitment meant to us and that I think has served us through harder times we are very happy and have two wonderful sons they are musicians Ben and Alfie I'd put a link but I don't know how you can just google them though I think you'd like them:)

Traffic on the Ohio Turnpike is a coffle of tractor - trailers as Golden Flashes coach Gary Waters argues that the RPI, that mystical set of numbers the NCAA tournament committee consults when it hands out at - large bids, should R.I.P. Every mid-major coach is sympathetic to Waters's argument, because big - time schools insist on playing nonconference games in their own arenas, with officials of their choosing, and the RPI doesn't penalize them for refusing to go on the road.

If I were the club hierarchy I would worry a lot more about empty seats because the fans stop to care and are no longer interested in all your arguments about having the perfect squad and needing no improvements, than about fans not showing up out of protest.

I think that children who are spanked are more likely to grow up into adults that spank because of the argument, «I got spanked and I turned out OK.»

I really was looking forward to finally reading it — not because I thought I would necessarily agree with Badinter's arguments, but because I (mistakenly, it turns out) assumed that any book garnering that kind of media attention would offer up some truly fresh thinking around issues of feminism and motherhood.

I went along to cover the event, but at the last minute the Ukip leader was forced to cancel his appearance because a number of heated arguments had broken out between his supporters and protesters.

I don't think many women will be alarmed by the thought of their political prospects being diminshed by a smaller Commons because women, generally, aren't as interested in politics as the academic argument on gender representation makes them out to be.

«It is one that is not going to happen and I think that those backbenchers who keep putting forward those sorts of ideas should just come out and accept that what they really want is for Britain to leave the European Union because that is the argument they are actually making.»

Over the past week I've heard the following arguments - they want to lift the poor out of tax, actually the main beneficiaries of this policy won't be the poor because they don't pay tax, but will instead be the middle class, anyway, on a point of principle we need to simplify the tax system, and we need to cut public services by # 80 billion per year, or maybe we don't.

Viewers picked holes pretty quickly in Clegg's «Lib Dems for coalition» pitch to conference, pointing out that his condemnation of single - party rule therefore undermines any argument that Lib Dem majority (or minority) government rule would be preferable, thus making his much - applauded line «In an ideal world, I wouldn't have to work with either of them because I'd be Prime Minister on my own thank you very much — and I'd like to think I'd do a better job too» fall rather flat.

«Unless you engage with that and win those arguments then when an attack does come argument and debate almost goes out of the window, because the imperative and the demand for protection becomes unstoppable, almost at whatever cost.

Since Nick's earlier posting, lawyers for the Senate Majority filed a request asking to reschedule the April 18 oral arguments to April 19 or 20 because lead counsel Michael Carvin will be out - of - town at a funeral.

Is it not the case that the Secretary of State is not producing a bail - out because the Treasury has finally won an argument inside the Government and explained to him that it can not afford the kind of support for the industry that, it seemed to me, his Department was trailing over the weekend?»

«I suppose it's somehow less hurtful to accuse hundreds of thousands of people of sexism than it is to pick on a specific person,» he writes, pointing out that Miller lacks a «coherent argument,» her case resting on a questionable analogy to the 2008 Obama / Clinton race, which Miller asserts Obama won purely because of sexist attacks on Hillary.

But if you're, you know just for argument -LSB-'s] sake, if you are 20 feet from the ship, but you're in the same, going exactly the same velocity as the ship, ordinarily well, you would be up the creek, so to speak; because with nothing to accelerate against you would just parallel the path of the ship until you run out of oxygen or starve to death, whatever.

While I am extremely grateful that we researched extensively and made this decision when we were pregnant with our first son, I have regret and guilt for not sending information to several pregnant friends who I later found out did circumcise their sons because they hadn't researched both sides of the argument and then deeply regretted it.

That's a shame, too, because there are places where the film gets out of argument mode long enough to recognize that Christians are generally judged by their friends and colleagues less by their arguments than their attitudes.

Honestly, when one of the debates in the film turns into an all - out brawl because one candidate brings up a story the other wrote when the opponent was 8 years old and calls it his «Communist manifesto» (See, one character in the story gives a pot of gold to a leprechaun, and that, according to the first candidate, is an example of his foe's innate belief in the redistribution of wealth), we're laughing in part because we've heard arguments of this variety before and with seemingly more frequency in the past few years.

Whenever a movie comes out with an important message, there is a tendency among viewers to want to like the film because of that message (provided they agree with it) and are willing to put plausibility aside for the sake of the argument presented.

But — and here we have the best argument possible for increased local autonomy instead of less — because of state law, hammered out in back rooms by powerful union interests, local voters were denied their electoral rights.

Because of Common Core, «there's more focus on kids using language to explain their reasoning, construct an argument, and point out evidence in the text,» says Hakuta.

But the AFT will never make that argument because it opens up the door for expanding choice, voucherizing school funding, and putting traditional districts from which the union draws its very existence out of business.

I tend to be suspicious of «developmentally inappropriate» arguments because 1) kids might be at different points developmentally and 2) any particular learning goal might appear developmentally inappropriate right up until the moment it doesn't (i.e., when we figure out kids can handle it if presented in such - and - such a way.)

This is such nonsense it almost doesn't require a response, because there are people out there who have a knee - jerk reaction against Apple that goes beyond critical thinking, but in the hopes of reaching more open - minded readers who might be tempted by that argument, let me address it.