Sentences with phrase «out of that heated atmosphere»

«Get out of that heated atmosphere and look at things in an objective way.

Not exact matches

Their message did not single out individual countries, but the administration of President Donald Trump has announced it is withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate accord, which seeks to curb emissions of heat - trapping gasses in the atmosphere.

Whether you wish to get out of the heat and enjoy an air - conditioned indoor dining room or our outside patio bar, The Bank - Mexican Restaurant and Bar offers authentic Mexican food, a great atmosphere in the historic First National Bank of Temecula building in the center of Old Town Temecula.

This means that the science of climate change may partially undergo a shift of its own, moving from trying to prove it is a problem (it is now «very likely» that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have already caused enough warming to trigger stronger droughts, heat waves, more and bigger forest fires and more extreme storms and flooding) to figuring out ways to fix it.

It turns out that the steady dripping of water deep underground can reveal a surprising amount of information about the constantly changing cycles of heat and cold, precipitation and drought in the turbulent atmosphere above.

No one knows whether fertilizing single - celled marine organisms is a sound way to pull more heat - trapping carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.

It turns out the energy in this whip - like process is high enough to generate Alfvén waves, a strong kind of wave scientists suspect is key to heating the sun's atmosphere and propelling the solar wind, which constantly bathes the solar system with charged particles from the sun.

Night - time is a chance for heat to escape back out into space, but the extra greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are trapping ever more of it.

That shift alters where heat from those waters is released into the atmosphere, which in turn knocks circulation patterns out of whack, creating a cascade around the planet.

Increased warming of the cool skin layer (via increased greenhouse gases) lowers its temperature gradient (that is the temperature difference between the top and bottom of the layer), and this reduces the rate at which heat flows out of the ocean to the atmosphere.

When an icy impact occurred, the impactor's kinetic energy became heat energy, instantly melted some ice, gouged out a crater, and kicked up into Mars» thin atmosphere large amounts of debris mixed with water (liquid, ice crystals, and vapor)-- and complex organic molecules that obviously came recently from life.127 Then, the dirt and salt - water mixture settled back to the surface in vast layers of thin sheets — strata — especially around the crater.

The rate of flow of heat out of the ocean is determined by the temperature gradient in the «cool skin layer», which resides within the thin viscous surface layer of ocean that is in contact with the atmosphere.

Adding further greenhouse gases to the atmosphere warms the ocean cool skin layer, which in turn reduces the amount of heat flowing out of the ocean.

There may be no connection whatsoever, but it is worth me checking it out in case the rock structure, its composition, density, and the results of its heating, as it fell through the earth's atmosphere, can give me a comparison or model for my moon rock - or even scorched microbes.

Kiryu can go from intimidating a bunch of street thugs to belting his heart out in a karaoke booth, and Kuroda brings the heat in both atmospheres, bringing the character to life.

To say it a bit worse but in modern lingo: to maintain radiative equilibrium, the planet has to put out a certain amount of heat, and if it can't radiate it out from the surface, the lower atmosphere somehow has to get warmer until there's some level that radiates the right amount.

b] heat is neutralized by the» cold vacuum» that penetrates into the atmosphere; not by heat radiating out of space and albedo gizmo, please read the Holy Grail!!!

As you may know, we have some satellites flowing around out of the atmosphere, which measure short waves (SW reflection) and heat (LW emission) from below.

Since anthropogenic emitted CO2 comes out of a power plant stacks / vehicle exhausts at an elevated temperature (due to the trivial manmade waste heat energy), and then cools down to near equilibrium with the rest of the atmosphere, why would this new CO2 then absorb more energy and heatup again?

Now, as I pointed out in an earlier post (# 104), there IS some evidence of a trend toward serious oceanic heating beginning roughly 21 years after 1979 (i.e., 2000), which suggests that this could be due to heat transfer from the atmosphere beginning in ca 1979.

(I pointed out in 231 that if all that heat that makes up the increase in ocean heat content since 2000 was in the atmosphere back in 1979, then it would have heated up the atmosphere on the order of 15 degrees C.)

But heat - trapping gases that have accumulated in the atmosphere, largely from the burning of fossil fuels, have become a dominant force, pushing the Earth's climate out of its normal range.

Victor wrote at 205, «Now, as I pointed out in an earlier post (# 104), there IS some evidence of a trend toward serious oceanic heating beginning roughly 21 years after 1979 (i.e., 2000), which suggests that this could be due to heat transfer from the atmosphere beginning in ca 1979.»

CO2 (and some other gases) in the atmosphere are however more opaque to LWIR; they absorb that a chunk of that outgoing radiation and re-radiate it in all directions — so that a fraction less than half is re-radiated downwards; which has the effect of slowing the transfer of heat (by radiation) out of the atmosphere.

The second point is that we have found distinctive variations in global warming with El Niño: a mini global warming, in the sense of a global temperature increase, occurs in the latter stages of an El Niño event, as heat comes out of the ocean and warms the atmosphere.

At the top of the atmosphere, the infra - red light escapes freely out to space, and this is where the planet's main heat loss takes place.

Also point out that in excess of 99.5 % of the atmosphere is completely transparent to IR and might as well not be there at all, except that it acts as a heat storage medium after IR absorption by CO2 (H2O, CH4, etc) and subsequent relaxation through collision with the O2 and N2 molecules of that medium.

In your notation to Figure 4 you say «At the top of the atmosphere, the infra - red light escapes freely out to space, and this is where the planet's main heat loss takes place.»

If in exceeds out and the diffential MUST exist from top to bottom of the atmosphere, then before the hotter air can migrate to the deep ocean, the daily temerature cycling will force the hotter air at the bottom into an overall equlibrium ie hotter air will rise — or more correctly since GHGs have heated the air up more at the bottom, then the sun induced daily warming will add more heat to the top, & less at the bottom to force the equilibrium — ie effectively hot air rising even if not in actuality.

Climate engineering: The leadership of the American Meteorological Society has staked its position on possible artificial interventions in climate ranging from sucking heat - trapping CO2 out of the atmosphere to adding high - altitude veils of sulfur to reflect the sun.

When it reaches a level high enough to cool it to it's «dew point» the water vapour condenses out in the form of clouds and rainfall and the Latent Heat of Condensation is released into the upper part of the atmosphere to accelerate the escape of radiant energy to space.

Globally, the Ozzies have pointed out that the oceans have been busy absorbing almost all of the heat energy (90 %) The atmosphere and the land, including ice, store the other 10 %.

But triggering an algae bloom is also a way to suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, and along with spewing particles into the stratosphere to block some of the sun's heat, it's one of the main techniques geoengineers talk about using if efforts to limit those emissions ultimately fail.

Just recently a «scientist» at the German hyper alarmist PIK «found out» that the (temporary) loss of sea ice in the arctic leads to increased ocean heat loss to the atmosphere resulting in more snow elsewhere.

Bob Tisdale says: January 10, 2011 at 3:05 pm Manfred says: «Just recently a «scientist» at the German hyper alarmist PIK «found out» that the (temporary) loss of sea ice in the arctic leads to increased ocean heat loss to the atmosphere resulting in more snow elsewhere.

CO2 traps heat According to radiative physics and decades of laboratory measurements, increased CO2 in the atmosphere is expected / predicted to absorb more infrared radiation as it escapes back out to space.

5) A warming effect in the atmosphere arises because between coming in and going out the radiant energy is «processed» by the molecules in the atmosphere into heat energy and then back again, often many times for a single parcel of radiant energy, the number of times being directly proportionate to the density of the atmosphere.

But during times of recession aerosols fall out, greenhouse gases remain in the atmosphere and heat is accumulated due to net positive forcing.

Third, as Roger Pielke Sr. is fond of pointing out, very little of the global energy imbalance actually goes into heating the surface and atmosphere.

The simplest explanation of why they are buncum was provided in Rabett Run's comments by one Flavius Collium who followed Eli in pointing out that the greenhouse effect does not require that the colder atmosphere heat the warmer earth, but

«We've been dumping heat into the atmosphere for years and the oceans have been doing their job, taking it out of the air and into the ocean,» said Sridhar Anandakrishnan, professor of geosciences, Penn State.

Other types of greenhouse gases, like methane — which does not last as long in the atmosphere as carbon but which traps more heat — are left out of the proposal.

We can take carbon out of the atmosphere, through biofuels, or by using solar / nuclear heat to turn CaCO3 into CaO and a pure stream of CO2 (to be sequestered), subsequently allowing the CaO to absorb CO2 from the air and so forth.

AGWSF claims it can because they have taken out the real heat from the Sun, longwave infrared, so they can pretend that measurements of this «downwelling heat from the atmosphere» are from their «greenhouse gases».

That statement can not have been connected with the specific question of how energy moves out of the air into the deep ocean because you had just literally told us to «Forget about how the missing heat might get from the atmosphere down to the ocean deeps below 700 metres.»

Global warming is heating up opportunities for companies that can find ways to pull carbon dioxide (CO2) out of the atmosphere and sell «carbon credits» on emerging markets.

At any specific moment a certain quantity of heat in the atmosphere is out of sensor range in the form of PE.

What you seem to fail to realize though is that a few tenths of a degree of temperature spread out in the ocean equates to eventual huge temperatures in the atmosphere when that heat is released.

In other words, your «analogy» of Earth's atmosphere allows more heat to be put in than can be taken out.

The Met Office state «The «greenhouse effect» is the way the atmosphere traps some of the energy we receive from the Sun (infrared radiation or heat, ultraviolet and visible light) and stops it being transmitted back out into space».