Sentences with phrase «out of the debate because»

George Galloway was accused of racism last night after video emerged of him storming out of a debate because he discovered his opponent was Israeli.

Not exact matches

Stiglitz told us that this decades - old debate about how to balance the creation of short - term and long - term value is recently gaining new life in the US because of the venomous class class tensions and ugly politics arising out of income inequality, and because people in positions of power are looking at the big picture and realizing that something has to change.

But beyond that, it's also a good time to ask because of a... let's just call it a spirited debate that recently broke out between two groups of scientists who work on climate and energy.

The exact size and growth of this workforce is debated, but workers employed under precarious work conditions make up a significant portion of the larger workforce, with estimates that 4 out of every 10 workers are now employed in precarious situations.49 These workers typically face higher income volatility than workers in traditional employment relationships because they spend more time unemployed or underemployed and some have low earnings.50

I also know people who hold to the same beliefs regarding homosexuals as fishon but who have gone out of their way to educate themselves on both sides of the debate... and even though they still think homosexuality is a sin, they don't resort to the language and comparasions that fishon does... because they know that homosexuality isn't anything comparable to pedophilia or alcoholism.

To hold the position that any debate you have you win because you have a divine operative that can never be wrong even when he is you just stand up and say «Our understanding of that is flawed so however the bible said it may not be what it meant but it's never ever wrong, someone go back to translating and interpreting it till we figure out a way around it's errors, er, i mean, misunderstood or mistranslated passages...»

Because Mr. Colson is prominent in this debate, it is important to point out where I think he is wrong, both in terms of policy and philosophy.

We are continuing to have this insane debate because we continue to beat our heads against the wall hoping that some kind of magical solution that no other country in the world has ever thought of will drop down out of the sky that allows us to keep the for - profit model and still deliver care to all.

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there)

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

Jeffrey Burton Russell points out that among historians of science «there's a strong debate going on between those who understand that the development of science is basically a Western European phenomenon, and that this is because of its Christian or Judeo - Christian roots, and those who maintain that religion blocked the progress of science until the 18th and 19th centuries, and that [science has] to struggle against religion.

It is an ignorant angle of argument, one that God is not interested in debating because He prefers to what He does best than senselessly argue: heal the sick, cast out demons, let the blind see and raise the dead.

The only reason we limit the discussion to the so - called «side A» and «side B» debate is because, as Cindy mentions above, the most you could ever squeeze out of Scripture is a prohibition on same - sex acts (which I still think takes quite a bit of squeezing).

I do understand the concept of the trinity, but let's be realistic... who made that up??? There is a lot of ignorance in this world, but if you can read the ten commandments — and they are very simple and straightforward — and know what they mean and convey then 1) the concept of the trinity goes out the window and 2) this entire debate about the building of the mosque goes oput the window as well because God instructed us «Love thy neighbor».

I am recently involved in learning about the lost gospels, the ones that were left out of the Canon because a group of influential men deemed them heretical and probably guilty of stirring up the kind of debate that's been going on in these comments.

I also have no issue debating the ins and outs of theology but sadly most people get too offended because they can't differentiate between when I criticize the beliefs vs. the person.

Now it is obvious you as well have used words to treaten me personally I would stop using verses... it is because my English is not strong to debate and make my self clear and that is why been quoting verses that speaks of the same subject... So as seems if all hate my quoting and that I can not express my self as should, the only choice I have is to stop completely participating in your blogs and rather go to look after my business and family, I think I have left words and links enough for any one who wants to find out what they want to know... so long...

Publications, including this one, sometimes close particular lines of correspondence so as not to wear out the patience of the wider readership, because they are becoming effectively a private dialogue with the same few correspondents and the debate is going nowhere.

We may be tempted to leave out Philemon because it is so badly attested in the second century and because debates later arose about its inspiration; but we must finally — after all these calculations — remember that if the scribe wrongly calculated the number of pages for his book he could glue on others at the end.

I kind of debated sharing this with you because I am not a big fan of the way the photos turned out, but in the end I decided what the heck?

Notes: I went back and forth debating whether I wanted to make this with pretzel or graham cracker crumbs, but in the end the pretzels won out because I had two big bags of them in the pantry.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

I am not going to fall out with other Arsenal supporters because of the debate about Wenger.

Whether or not you feel that a protest is necessary for change is a debate that can be held in the comments, because although some will feel it is the only way that fans can make club officials see want what is wanted, others will say that Wenger deserves more respect than to be forced out the club by protest and a lack of support when he is only following Kroenke's orders.

«For me, the contract does not have special meaning but, because of the debate, maybe I should have sorted that out earlier.»

«For me, the contract does not have special meaning but, because of the debate, maybe I should have sorted that out earlier,» the Frenchman, who is in charge of Arsenal since 1996, said.

According to him, the NDC pulled out of the IEA debate because it disagreed with the approach even though they recognize the institution as a credible organization.

When, for example, he attracts criticism for saying he admires Vladimir Putin in a magazine interview, Alastair Campbell is blamed for having «trapped» him into saying it; when he loses the first TV debate it's because he allowed himself «to be persuaded to act out of character»; and when it comes to the declining value of Brent crude Salmond writes breezily that «no - one really knows what the price of oil is going to be in the short term», despite having spent several years arguing precisely the contrary.

Because devolution goes to the heart of the localism debate, we've put together a representative cross-section of what's out there.

But if Gordon Brown pulls a last - minute rabbit out of his hat or if David Cameron goofs in the last television debate, the outcome could easily be reversed, because such events can move 5 % or more of the electorate.

«Unless you engage with that and win those arguments then when an attack does come argument and debate almost goes out of the window, because the imperative and the demand for protection becomes unstoppable, almost at whatever cost.

«I was very disappointed in Candy Crowley because not only did she inject herself in the midst of the hottest part of a presidential debate perhaps of all the debates we've had since they've started out decades ago, but that she was flat out wrong,» Pataki said.

Grant Shapps pulled out of an election debate in Hampstead tonight because he had parents evening.

The Speaker points out that MPs keep on using their points of order to start a debate, but says - and this is very interesting - he will continue to allow them because of the extent of «anger» in the House.

Schrödinger proposed his «cat» after debates with Albert Einstein over the Copenhagen interpretation, which Schrödinger defended, stating in essence that if a scenario existed where a cat could be so isolated from external interference (decoherence), the state of the cat can only be known as a superposition (combination) of possible rest states (eigenstates), because finding out (measuring the state) can not be done without the observer interfering with the experiment — the measurement system (the observer) is entangled with the experiment.

Hope was shocked by the number of «unhelpful, unconstructive, and personal attacks,» he says, but he is determined to contribute to further debate, believing that discussing the future of academic careers is important, not least because «some colleagues suggested they felt the same way but were too afraid to speak out.»

Because the efficacy of combining vitamin C and exfoliating acids is an ongoing debate among skincare specialists, it may be worth it to play it safe and space out your products, morning and night.

«This is the face you make when you ask your female friend why she put on a shirt for your day out on the beach and she said «because if I don't wear a shirt I'm immediately signaling to the world that I'm a sexual object up for debate instead of just @zacefron's friend on the beach» and you're like, «I'm Zac Efron and I honestly had no idea about this double standard.»

Rather, I had to mention it simply because it has come up recently in our Movies We Watched column and sparked some rather heated debate among R3ers over on Letterboxd, and if you've been left out of all that because you haven't seen the film, here's your chance to rectify that.

Honestly, when one of the debates in the film turns into an all - out brawl because one candidate brings up a story the other wrote when the opponent was 8 years old and calls it his «Communist manifesto» (See, one character in the story gives a pot of gold to a leprechaun, and that, according to the first candidate, is an example of his foe's innate belief in the redistribution of wealth), we're laughing in part because we've heard arguments of this variety before and with seemingly more frequency in the past few years.

But because it was, in part, a reaction to the new math and those believed responsible for it, NCTM did not, as mathematicians point out, promote a lively public debate, as had the creators of the new math, but suppressed it.

«There are lots of education pundits out there who embrace the diversion of an endless standards debate because they are clueless about how to actually improve student learning.»

Because the new policy was tucked into the state budget, it came with no stand - alone legislation, meaning it emerged from the General Assembly with a minimum of public scrutiny and debate, critics point out.

But they are not likely to end a contentious, noisy debate about evaluation systems, and they are almost certain to be intensely debated, in part because of Gates» separate support for advocacy organizations that have already staked out positions on teacher evaluations.

As was pointed out helpfully by DeFiore in WU discussion, the HarperCollins demonstration of ebook profitability for News Corp backers that touched off the debate is «a simplistic look at a complex issue» because it represents one profit scenario devised for investors» eyes, an example that can be affected and changed by «all kinds of pricing experiments and price points.»

I always recommend to people it's a good idea to open a bank account somewhere other than where you owed the money because if they tracked you down, then even though legally we can debate whether they can do it or not, it's not that hard for Bank ABC to take money out of your account if you owe them.

Exactly what this creature is or why it even exists is up for debate because it looks completely out - of - place and only appears once in the game and only for a very small amount of time, but the point is stealth is the key to progressing past it.

It's disturbing stuff to say the least and damning of geek and gaming culture as a whole that we keep having these same debates and watching the self - appointed gatekeepers of gaming attempt to chase women out of the clubhouse and off of the Internet because they dare to set foot into the «male» domain.

Kroiz was particularly gratified by the debates that occur during the afternoon session: «This chance to discuss the work with professionals of varied backgrounds helps to make sure that work that could be passed over or accepted because there was a misinterpretation of the artist's ability was flushed out, with the opportunity to discuss the work further.»

I do agree there's often snarking and tetchiness in the comments, sometimes from those cheerleading the basic message of the posts themselves - which is a shame, because important nuances in the posts and subsequent discussion are drowned out with this sort of debate, and genuinely curious but under - informed folk are discouraged by it.