Sentences with phrase «out of the debate process»

Not exact matches

While he allows that doctrinal debates about Christ and the Trinity are of only antiquarian interest, he comes out for what he calls a «redemptive process» in which good people do not give up on the goal of establishing the kingdom of God on earth.

The former Liberal Democrats leader Paddy Ashdown told the BBC the Lib Dems wanted to see debates «anchored as part of the established process of the British democratic right at an election» - and would take part even if the first debate turned out to be a farce.

But in the process, it laid the groundwork for another debate in the Legislature over what has become a contentious mix of ethnic and racial politics playing out in a diverse suburban district, which may preview similar fights in other locations.

Three points stand out: the parliamentary process which led to the defeat, the influence of the Iraq War, and the debate this now creates about the direction of British policy.

In the end, Manlius Republican Kevin Holmquist, who's been criticizing a process he said left the pubic out of the debate, couldn't pull enough legislators to see his side of the story.

With those central issues still percolating on Thursday night, smaller bills moved along amid the steady stop - and - go legislative process of debate, vote, stand at ease, conference, eat take - out, repeat.

Within minutes of her remark, her staff sent out a memo highlighting de Blasio's comments during a 2005 council speaker debate where he said, «I think after extensive public discussion, after extensive hearings, I think we should move forward with an additional four - year term through the legislative process.»

In the cases, just this last couple of elections, where stem cell politics, for example, has been played out in the electoral process, stem cell research is [has] done better than the winning candidates for offices; and I think, apart from that, I think that we do have a serious problem in general education of the sciences and that accounts for the reluctance of a large segment of the population to accept the principles of evolution and think that there is still a debate about it, which there isn't — and that's a problem we need to solve, — but I still think there is an incredible constituency for science in this country.

What is great about this debate is that it is bringing certain subjects out into the open, e.g. the dangers of refined and processed food, the statin scam, the biased and controlling medical profession and Big Pharma, and the need for food that hasn't been drugged, doped or dosed with poison.

As he explains in his book, The Behavior Gap, selecting investments should come at the end of the planning process, not the beginning: «You would never spend time researching and debating whether to travel by plane, train, or car until you figured out where you are going.»

Great debates and discussions have challenged the pros and cons of taking the «middle man» out of the federal student loan process but the end result is that they are now missing from the equation.

A lot of people have different positions in the AGW debate, and with so many people and so much uncertainty particularly about the mechanisms and rate constants of all of the kinetic processes involved, I find it implausible that people would waste time on the simple comparisons, making much sound and fury, when it starts out with a short term comparison of CO2 and temperature over the same last few years.

To do this well would require you to stop your work in physics and devote your time full - time to the study of human motivations and cognitive processes processes, as they play themselves out in the climate debate.

As long as there are highly relevant questions that the ABA regards as taboo, and as long as there are persons and organizations the ABA is not willing to involve in its consultation processes, out of fear that they might raise (and respond to) those taboo questions, both the effectiveness and the integrity of the debate are necessarily compromised.

There has been a long debate about importing an «opt out» process but this is usually met with howls of derision of the horrors of the US class process (which they imported from us and we then abandoned).

But the only way to arrive at any answer to that question is through the process I've laid out above: Free, open, honest debate based on hard facts, conducted with analytical reasoning, and carried out with the interests of the public always at the forefront.