Sentences with phrase «out of the discussion about»

The book grew out of discussions about theological schooling within the faculty of his own theological school.

There are many students who are left out of the discussion about improving student achievement.

The idea came out of a discussion about Artemis, and thinking how cool it would be to make a game out of that frantic scene in Star Wars where Han and Luke are climbing ladders and shooting TIE fighters in the Falcon.

Law society Treasurer Paul Schabas says some misleading information had come out of the discussion about the requirement.

Not exact matches

When people talk about entrepreneurship, most of the discussions revolve around the sense of fulfillment or satisfaction they get from building something out of nothing.

After a pre-screening of the documentary, a heated discussion broke out on Twitter about the documentary and my comments.

So if higher wages are out of the question at your company, try to first center a discussion about rewards around nonmonetary perks.

The best way to approach this is to send out an e-mail after the board meeting saying something like «After reflecting on our discussion at the board meeting about (topic X), I don't feel I clearly understand each of your positions.

Family members, authority figures, or executives who want to appear to care about the opinion of another person, but really want their instructions carried out without discussion, often favor tag questions.

Basically, the role of management discussions is very similar to my outlook overall in life — it's about seeking out many opinions, hearing many views, testing views against your own frameworks and then making decisions once you have tested your theories and approaches.

Indeed, for all the discussion of the production rate for 737s or the combat range of the F / A -18 C Hornet, McNerney's 20 months at Boeing have been about leading an organization of more than 150,000 employees, with sales of more than $ 59 billion, out of a moral abyss.

In August 2007, 22 members of the House of Representatives asked George Bush to back away from the SPP because of their concerns that it may undermine U.S. sovereignty and their strong objections about important discussions continuing «out of public view and without congressional oversight or approval» or the «proper transparency and accountability.»

At another point, he was asked about the Cambridge University Psychometrics Centre — which he said had initially been involved in discussions between him and SCL to be part of the project but fell out of the arrangement.

You can usually find out about future risks by reading the management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) section of the annual reportAnnual report A financial report that a company prepares for its shareholders each year.

«There are certainly things that are illegal content, so that is more of an area where talking about regulations could make sense, but so much of what comes up in general discussion about this is out of reach of government action from the get - go.»

Much of the discussion about what to do in the aftermath of the mass shooting has played out on Twitter and Facebook.

The sentiment seemed widespread on tech and media Twitter: there was a lack of specificity in terms of questions about privacy (this allowed Zuckerberg to turn nearly every question about the ownership of data to a discussion about user interface controls that limit where data is shown to other Facebook users), plenty of dodged questions (every time there was a question about the data Facebook generates about users beyond what they themselves enter into the system Zuckerberg needed to «check with his team»), and bad questions that presumed Facebook sells data, letting Zuckerberg run out the clock at least three times by explaining the basics of Facebook's business model (this is precisely why I have been so outspoken about the problem of perpetrating this falsehood: it lets Facebook off the hook).

A whole discussion can be had about the effect of the Bitcoin network and value on the interest and price of alternative cryptocurrencies, but the point is that for the purpose of privacy it can be relatively easy and cheap to move into Monero and back out in Bitcoin, or at some exchanges, directly into cash.

Preston: [00:19:26] So if I wanted to have a transaction with you and I wanted it to be included on the blockchain but there's they're running out of space on the blockchain if I include a tip, like hey here's an extra dollar here's an extra $ 2 for this transaction I'm trying to have with my buddy that was that tip went to the minors which I'm not even going to get into the discussion about minors here.

They regularly organize presentations, discussions, pub nights, parties, and other creative outings to foster a community of people and businesses interested in learning about and creating a new economy.

In the first episode, you hear him make a fool out of himself in front of prominent Silicon Valley investor Chris Sacca and in many episodes, you hear earnest discussions with his wife Nazanin about the company and their future.

A number of years ago another prof at Iowa State was singled out and his peers and got him fired because he wanted an open discussion about evolutionary theory.

I'm as keen as anyone for a discussion about old earth / young earth (i'm a young earther for the record — at least I think I am But rather than all this constant intellectual bollix, let's sort out some of these basic issues first.

I was just doing this as part of my trilogy; it started with Buddha and then Jesus, and now it turns out serendipitously that the timing is appropriate because there is so much discussion about Islam in the world.

Any way say, Man of God respectable Terry Jones, of Florida's Dove's Church, maybe a day would come that the world and Muslims would thank you for your causing all these discussions to come out today's on this site blogs and many other sites blogs and to it leading to have more people religious discussions leading them read and learn more about Islam and the Quran many who's eyes had opened to reality converted to Islam or at least respect Muslims and their religion.

Clearly, the role of Mary is central in any Christian discussion about women, and Pope John Paul brought this out in his letter Mulieris Dignitatem:

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there)

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

What I am trying to stress is that the focus of many discussions about proselytism leaves out the role of communication.

In this line of thought it is worth pointing out that Discussion about mission has raised a question about the very nature of the church.

It would be better if he were to keep religion out of political discussion, especially when it comes to an argument between RC and Protestant about who is the most Satanic.

I think given equal opportunities there will be a natural inclination for many towards traditional roles and that this is healthy, has nothing to do with any artificial social construct but is natural and comes out of biology and now might be the time to be having open discussions about this kind of thing without having to face the fear of being labelled misogynistic for doing so or with feeling fearful of any threat to equality.

Now, could it possibly be that the reason the answer is out of reach is because the bible was written by numerous, imperfect human beings, under the influence of their own religious biases, and all those writings have been complied, hundreds of years later, by men of equal imperfectness and religious biases, so as to render any logical discussion about what the hell was their intention in writing what the wrote, completely implausible?

Fear is what prevails in most Muslim heart when in comes to trying to have any rational discussion about who carries out any break in the tenets of this faith.

Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.

If discussion on our Facebook page is any indication, the punch - line about God's sovereignty at the end of this Mophie ad turned out to be pretty polarizing.

But «a moral discussion is inconclusive and even trivial, if it leaves out the question of its application,» as Gregory Vlastos has said.13 In order to be as specific as possible about this approach to Christian social philosophy I shall outline in arbitrary fashion five general principles which I suggest can be supported by the evidence of human experience as being necessary guides to the conditions under which the Good Society can grow.

I tried to stay out of the discussion as much as possible to see what they thought about such things.

From âpihtawikosisân: The Canadian government continues to mouth platitudes about its supposed dedication to this relationship, while it slashes funding, ignores our emergencies, pulls out of comprehensive land claim discussions, «consults» with us and then ignores everything we told them, all while pursuing a hard - line agenda which accepts only termination as a result.

We can and should debate theology and doctrine, but we must never think that we are the infallible interpreters of Scripture and determiners of people's destiny, and should also remember that doctrine, as important as it is, becomes evil when debates and discussions about theology keep us from living out the loving gospel in tangible ways to a hurting and dying world.

Man of God respectable Terry Jones, of Florida's Dove's Church, maybe a day would come that the world and Muslims would thank you for your causing all these discussions to come out today's on this site blogs and many other sites blogs and to it leading to have more people religious discussions leading them read and learn more about Islam and the Quran many who's eyes had opened to reality converted to Islam or at least respect Muslims and their religion.

I have deliberately left out of the discussion such topics as ethics and the Christian family — although I have talked about responsibility, both for one's own adult behavior and for helping one's children develop the essential emotional equipment with which to face life.

Brian's eyebrows nearly hit his hairline when I told him a bit about the whole fall - out of an offensive post, and the subsequent challenging (read: crazy - making) discussion spinning out of control.

We did end up having a discussion about different faiths - expressing nor endorsing opinions on any in particular but merely educating the students on the differences (and then they pointed out the lack of difference between many).

But actually requiring a dialogue, question and answer, interactive discussion about a text of Scripture, which then leads to brainstorming about how everybody can go out and put it into practice in tangible ways, and then actually going out and doing it, requires too much for most people.

There may be room for discussion about just how Descartes understood free «will, but it is out of the question to suppose, as Griffin does, that Descartes might have allowed that we are deceived by God about our free will.

fred, as has been well described above, you are way out of your depth and should not engage in discussions about advanced scientific topics.

(One of the wonderful things about blog discussions is that sometimes they bring agreement and understanding out of apparent disagreement.

«During the discussion about the possible beatification / canonization of Pope Pius XII the major critique of Pius has been his failure to speak out against the Nazi Holocaust with sufficient specificity.

If you took the word «god» out of these discussions, and then told people about all the miracle stories everybody would say you are delusional or insane.