Sentences with phrase «out of the discussion because»

Try once more, but I did tell you that I am trying to stay out of discussions because of company.

I agree with amberjee that oversupply is often left out of the discussion because so much attention (rightly so) is put on those having trouble with undersupply.

Well, this is where I'll have to drop out of the discussion because I really don't see how there was any agenda behind the person posting the article.

Not exact matches

In August 2007, 22 members of the House of Representatives asked George Bush to back away from the SPP because of their concerns that it may undermine U.S. sovereignty and their strong objections about important discussions continuing «out of public view and without congressional oversight or approval» or the «proper transparency and accountability.»

You know, this trade discussion around how it works out with China is a bigger deal than people give credit to because they are literally 50 % of the demand in the world for commodities: iron ore, nickel, aluminum, zinc.

The discussion started off asking why the number of women on public boards was so low — around 18 % (or lower)-- Gouw stated that this is typically because when there are open spots on boards, the typically all - male board members reach out to their own networks and it propagates adding more men to boards.

Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site: «My guess is that Shiller's rationalization is that he can do more good saying things the way he does because at least he gets the message out» What good is getting a message out if it's the wrong message?

The whole discussion that we should have on here is on de-dollarization, but the conflict that's going on right now and part of the answer out of that is what's going to happen to cryptocurrencies because it's a way of getting around the controls that the central banks really have on the creation of money, the value of that money and the debasements of those currencies.

A number of years ago another prof at Iowa State was singled out and his peers and got him fired because he wanted an open discussion about evolutionary theory.

Initially, it appears that they were already evil because of their pride, but a more fundamental reason reveals itself in Augustine's discussion: «Now, nature could not have been depraved by vice had it not been made out of nothing.»

I was just doing this as part of my trilogy; it started with Buddha and then Jesus, and now it turns out serendipitously that the timing is appropriate because there is so much discussion about Islam in the world.

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there)

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

I tried to stay out of the discussion as much as possible, because I didn't want to guide the discussion into what my Bible College, Seminary, and years of pastoral experience had taught me.

Hence some aethiest stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Hence some believers stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Now, could it possibly be that the reason the answer is out of reach is because the bible was written by numerous, imperfect human beings, under the influence of their own religious biases, and all those writings have been complied, hundreds of years later, by men of equal imperfectness and religious biases, so as to render any logical discussion about what the hell was their intention in writing what the wrote, completely implausible?

In one of my discussions with the youth of Malaipallaiyam they brought out the idea that the goddess is situated at the boundary of the colony because she stands as a warning to those persons who may cast an «evil eye» on the people (particularly, the women and the children), land and property of the Paraiyars.

Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.

It is good this issue is coming out because it is something that needs to be discussed but there's so much yelling and arguing on both sides I'm afraid you would get as much discussion from a group of first graders.

We can summarize the discussion up to this point by saying that the literary form of Mark's tomb pericope shows definite signs of having developed in three stages, consisting of two appendices with one third final addition (leaving aside the fact that in the second century a still further addition of Mark 16:9 — 20 was made) and that because of this, it may not have been part of the author's original plan as he set out to write his Gospel.

The only reason we limit the discussion to the so - called «side A» and «side B» debate is because, as Cindy mentions above, the most you could ever squeeze out of Scripture is a prohibition on same - sex acts (which I still think takes quite a bit of squeezing).

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

I genuinely was interested in this subject because of late it has somewhat been playing on my mind and so sought to discover the truth on the matter and so sought out discussions and literature by christian writers that I might examine their different stances on the issue and try to find a moral cross-section as I think is appropriate for all questions since the ranging views are like politics ranging from far left wing to far right wing views.

First, discussion of Intelligent Design's argument against neo-Darwinism is out of place in a high - school science classroom because most scientists working in the area do not accept the Intelligent Design criticism of neo-Darwinism and because understanding the scientific issues involves sophisticated arguments far beyond the capacity of nonspecialists, let alone high - school students.

He singles out this text, as he says, because it «introduced a new note of historical objectivity» into its discussion, ostensibly to hide its pro - Catholic / anti-Protestant religiopolitical agenda, a quality he also finds in Gregory's book.

but for matters of discussion, a will say these, Mourinho really knows how to get the best out of strikers == > drogba, eto, benzema (34 liga goals when he was manager at madrid), an average milito, costa etc and i don't know why but i feel that falcao may light the pl next season based on the fact that he himself wants to show everyone what hes got... we must buy another striker who has a better assist goal ratio because a

I'm saying I think there are a handful of fighters who could be in that discussion but once you get to that stage it's just opinion you can't really determine it because there are so many moving parts, I don't think having a loss or two takes you out of the top tier in any way, great fighters can lose

Now we are out of that multiple year guarantee discussion because its not beneficial for the team to get rid of him even if he has a bad year or injury year 1.

You're now done with the discussion because you have no way of wiggling out of the bullshit you said.

Realistically, he's off the board to win it all at this point, and I'm only leaving him in this category because he's done nothing to fall entirely out of the discussion, and there's still enough time to profit from others» failures.

«We need to conclude those discussions with Quicken, but you also need to maintain your flexibility because whether or not Quicken steps up, we need to have all of our options in the event that a sponsor is looking at a different — or we're going to take the tournament in a different direction... We're not concluded in those discussions and if you have to make a commitment now, you can't make it without a sponsor, which is why we at this point in time will not be at Congressional next year and have opted out of that agreement.»

The best way to find out if your bottles are going to work for a particular sanitizer, or a particular bottle opener is to read reviews on the products because this is basically the major topic in discussions on these products as people try to use them to do all sorts of different activities.

It is in Elia's interest to have a good relationship with Cuomo because of his power over the budget, but Benjamin said it would be «unwise» of the governor to leave Elia out of the discussions on education policy.

In an e-mail response to questions submitted by ScienceInsider, Kawaoka explains that he has not spoken out until now in part because of his discussions with Nature.

And by sorting things out and talking to colleagues — very important talking to colleagues, because it was the discussion with another colleague John Parker at the University of North Carolina that first turned on the lights that this new protein might be the long - sought water channel.

And again, we'll the show notes for everything, the full transcription, again in my new Thyroid Book that will be coming out very soon, just putting the finishing touches on it, we're gonna have a chapter in the book all on this type of discussion, putting it all together because I feel like this is probably one of the key pieces that most functional medicine practitioners and doctors really, it — it's very esoteric.

After measuring for the initial fitting purposes, she cut out the pattern and the fabric, which caused a lot of discussion because it was so interesting.

Because Leigh's method of working with actors and creating his films out of improvisation is well known, it is almost entirely excluded from the discussion.

The chip's theft would be devastating to the nations of the world and upset the balance of power and / or would put Apple and Microsoft out of business; the explanation is tossed off quickly and is really not germane to this discussion, because mainly what the movie wants and needs are excuses for people to fight and wisecrack and drive stylish cars very quickly and blow things up and smash vehicles and destroy property and make some more jokes and maybe flirt a little and kill people without dwelling too long on the dead bodies and maybe quite possibly and casually kill innocent civilians but not acknowledge anything more than — wow!

I don't want to be locked out of the oppressed - peoples discussion because I'm white or male any more than I want to be invited in because I'm gay.

«This is a step in the right direction because leaving any group out of the discussion is a detriment; however, it is a shame that this type of thing has to be legislated.»

`... They leave out the causes that are in the teacher's behaviour, or at least they leave out the discussion of that, because again they see that as risky and threatening for the relationship,» Robinson says.

I think that after November, we were talking internally, because there was a lot of discussion out there in the public domain about, what's the role of the federal government, especially when it comes to advancing school choice.

I recently joined Julian Vasquez Heilig and T. Jameson Brewer, two academics who have made quite the cottage industry out of bashing TFA, for the second episode of their podcast, Truth for America — not because it has a big audience (it doesn't) but because I think it's generally a good idea to engage with people who disagree with your views, if you can keep the discussion civil and productive.

In the interview, she said that her policy was not to suppress discussions about the tests within schools, but that she felt «any conversations have to be balanced, because in the past it was more of the opt - out movement.»

This is an easy question for me to answer because my opponent, who's under contract with the Washington Education Association, will be conflicted out of all discussions related to collective bargaining.

MPG is not a good measure for this discussion because it brings in factors like gearing which I want to keep out of this discussion.

Barry's digital backlist earns him very little per sale, is priced high, and if I'm reading the lengthy discussion on Konrath's blog right, doesn't matter because he hasn't earned out any of his advances yet.

I say «usually,» because this long, slow, digitally - mediated discussion we're having is taking place strung out across the same period of time in which I'm finally finishing my doctorate in digital comics.