I appreciate that you bowed
out of the discussion here, however.
Since not many of us earn the required status, that means most of us can't book first class awards... so we are leaving
it out of the discussion here.
Not exact matches
Stephen Gordon has pointed
out here on Econowatch that many tax policy
discussions of late have involved hiking taxes that are perceived to be paid by someone else (the rich; corporations).
Here, at the early stages
of discussion, he stressed, the board spoke to only two prospective buyers — Silver Lake and Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts — and KKR dropped
out early.
Here is a Deutsche Bundesbank
discussion paper that looks at the «Small Bang,» a 2009 revision
of contract terms for European CDS that improved liquidity in that market, to try to figure
out which effect is more important:
This has been a topic that keeps getting a lot
of discussion so I figured I'd cover some
of the basics
here just to get some answers
out there for those who are curious.
Preston: [00:19:26] So if I wanted to have a transaction with you and I wanted it to be included on the blockchain but there's they're running
out of space on the blockchain if I include a tip, like hey
here's an extra dollar
here's an extra $ 2 for this transaction I'm trying to have with my buddy that was that tip went to the minors which I'm not even going to get into the
discussion about minors
here.
The whole
discussion that we should have on
here is on de-dollarization, but the conflict that's going on right now and part
of the answer
out of that is what's going to happen to cryptocurrencies because it's a way
of getting around the controls that the central banks really have on the creation
of money, the value
of that money and the debasements
of those currencies.
I sometimes find the
discussions on
here become so convoluted that I just bow
out of them!
I won't go into a detailed
discussion of this
here but I'll just point
out that Paul asked in Romans 6 «How can we who died to sin still live in it?
Whitehead did work
out a complex theory
of value, but my point
here is only to indicate that Whitehead's way
of understanding human beings as part
of nature both requires that we extend the ethical
discussion and gives us clues as to how to do this.
I shall not delay the
discussion here to defend Bergson against his critics, except to point
out that what is frequently termed «irrationalism» in Bergson is precisely what he has in common with all modern disciplines that take the dimension
of depth seriously.
I am
out of those conversations from
here on
out; those
discussions go nowhere fast.
But now
here we go, you aren't willing to have a civil
discussion but mock one's faith so that throws
out any sort
of argument you may have.
I get annoyed with the way he writes about a lot
of things and that came
out yesterday in a way that didn't add to a
discussion, I can see why that isn't how things go around
here, so I have no confusion over why it would be issued a warning.
Discussions regarding OG are always quite heated on
here, but I'd like to point
out that he did indeed score 14 goals in 27 appearances: however, only 21
of those matches were starts.
Discussion is lively
here, but everything some fans say is all based in the tinted perspective
of Wenger
Out.
While I believe all the issues on The Lunch Tray are worthy
of discussion (even if some are a little sillier than others), and even though we've certainly discussed childhood hunger
here and will continue to do so, any site claiming to be dedicated to «kids and food, in school and
out» really ought to take affirmative steps to help kids with no food at all.
Update: This post led to a
discussion of the mysterious «Perfection Salad» that appears on the menu — check it
out here, and even more retro - Jello - fun
here.]
For the record,
here's what Paterson had to say about borrowing just last week, insisting he had never ruled it
out, altogether, but was chagrined that it had become the focus
of discussion (thanks,
of course, to his hand - picked LG, Richard Ravitch):
It's a great opportunity for somebody who's just starting
out in the field, since NET web interns typically get to work on dozens
of different projects in the course
of their stay
here, as well as participate in communications strategy
discussions, planning meetings, brainstorming sessions and occasional field trips to wherever I feel like getting coffee that morning.
Let's be clear: Even though neither
of those unions have formally endorsed Cuomo, they are clearly fronting for him
here and attempting to move the
discussion away from the mosque — a touchy subject for Democrats ever since President Obama weighed in, and
out, and in again — and onto the politicization
of Ground Zero, which is basically the equivalent
of kicking a hornets» nest.
There is no space to set
out in detail what our values ought to be
here, but in subsequent posts I hope contributors will add to the
discussion in the spirit
of Alex Wilcock's «what the Liberal Democrats stand for» meme.
So, with this I think the next wiser step left for Osoba is to lead his people
out of (Egypt) APC to promised land.Moreso, with what his on grand now in ogun state toward 2015 election, am sorry for Amosu, especially when all who is who in ogun politics are ready to work with Osoba and there is strong alliance
discussion going on in opposition party, but people even in Amosun cabinet were leaving APC day by day, I foresee what happened in Ekiti and kwara between Olushola SARAKI and then governor Lawal again in ogun come 2015, The victory
of Aregbesola for APC in osun is so diffrent with this: some few month to election in osun many politician especially former governors were started joining APC to support Aregbesola while reverse is the case in ogun
here, many even in cabinet are leaving the government to oppose Amosun, just imagine ew months to election now all former governors were agaist Amosun, all senators, Reps, and many assembly members were leaving APC agaist him and this is just the begining.Though,» ETI O WUN A WI TI OLUWA LASE» yet All EYI O WUN TI A NWI NI 2001, ILE OSOBA NI OLUWA TI FI ADE SI NI 2011.
BOSTON — A heated
discussion broke
out here today at the annual meeting
of the American Society
of Human Genetics over a hot - button topic: When will we know enough about rare cancer risk genes to begin routinely testing for them in patients with a family history
of cancer?
Scientists have through their research figured
out that RNA, a close relative
of DNA could have been a first step towards life but RNA needs to go or anything needs to go into something protected so that it can do its replicating thing; and
here is where Steve's
discussion of fat comes in.
I'd like to be even - handed
here and point
out that the comment in # 6 does not help any
discussion of climate science.
Though there are many programs
out there that separate the development
of different performance parameters into different mesocycles (medium length training cycles) throughout the year, that is not the scope
of this
discussion - rather, the emphasis
here will be on adjusting your current training routine to improve strength, speed and power simultaneously, without dropping the specific training activities you would otherwise be doing.
The blog includes commentary and
discussion about the topics above, as well as actual «Experiments» — but just in case you've missed
out on any
of the Experiments which we've already announced,
here are some links for you to catch up
Check
out the comments
here for more
of a
discussion on eHarmony's matching system, including some comments from matching experts like Helen Fisher.
A growing community
of readers and commenters has made its home
here at Mario Party Legacy, and while we all love the
discussion and the activity, it can get a bit
out of control.
Here, as in many other areas
of interest, professional practice is more varied and complicated than the simplified patterns that often stand
out in scholarly
discussions.
Click
here to watch her recent
discussion of the Long Island «opt -
out» movement on «Behind the News Long Island,» with Sergio Argueta and Estrella Ollivares - Orellana.
It turns
out we can test everything to and from 60 mph
here, so for brevity's sake we'll stick to a
discussion of those results.
With major new initiatives coming
out of the agencies represented
here — Blair on new production, Aitken Alexander's international expansion, and what is, in fact, a BBC production deal for Curtis Brown, as well (on Susanna Clarke's Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell)-- I hope to return to more
of this panel's
discussion of the agent's developing role in the business in coming days.
Besides, there's NO ONE
here that can have a
discussion on a proper author classification, and not certainly on «making a living
out of their books» which touches nothing on the quality
of the work.
If you need to spend less time in online
discussions,
here are 13 ways to ensure you get kicked
out of a few groups.
On this point,
here are some take -
outs from my experience
of the three days
of listening and
discussion.
This is
here for two reasons (1) to be used in a
discussion about reading the guarantee and responsible breeding and placement
of dogs and (2) to point
out that if a pet shop can provide this guarantee you surely shouldn't settle for even less from the breeder you choose.
A growing community
of readers and commenters has made its home
here at Mario Party Legacy, and while we all love the
discussion and the activity, it can get a bit
out of control.
If you're a WMD Member, you can check
out the in - depth
discussion details in the WMD Portal thread
here, For those who missed
out on signing up for Project CARS, some footage
of Ben Collins trying
out the game's Formula C car and post-play comments on aspects such as the tyre physics has been released by Darren White 9Project CARS» Art Director), and can be seen below.
If you find the
discussion interesting and would like a more robust (full hour) talk on the same subject, you can get the slides and notes for the entire GDC 2011 talk
here (also linked on the right) or check
out the full video
of the talk on the GDC Vault, where it is now available for free.
This year's
discussion on most anticipated was close too, but there's more a sense
of frustration since a lot
of the games we're picking from
here year after year are the same — because they still aren't
out.
«Speaking
out: Siting the Voice in Contemporary Asian Art», Courtauld Institute
of Art and Kings College, University
of London 2017 Conceptualism — Intersectional Readings, International Framings Conference, AHRC Black Artists and Modernism project in collaboration with Van Abbemuseum, NL, 7 - 9 December 2017 Trinh T Minh - ha Symposium, ICA London, 3 December 2017 Women in Collections Symposium, Contemporary Art Society / Sackler CPD Programme, Leeds City Art Gallery, 19 October 2017 Deviant Researching Symposium, part
of Demodernising the Collection, Van Abbemuseum, NL, 21 - 23 September 2016 Now and Then,
Here and There Conference, AHRC Black Artists and Modernism, Chelsea College
of Art and Design, UAL / Clore auditorium, Tate Britain, 6 - 8 October 2016 Kung Fury: Contemporary Debates in Martial Arts Cinema Symposium, AHRC Martial Arts Studies Network, Birmingham City University, 1 April 2015 Martial Arts Studies Conference, with Luke White, Cardiff University, 10 - 12 June 2015 How to See the World Panel
discussion & book launch, with Nicholas Mirzeoff, Jon Bird, Sonia Boyce, Nadja Milner - Larsen, ICA, London 4 June 2015 (In) Direct Speech: «Chineseness» in Contemporary Art Symposium, University
of Lisbon, 16 - 19 March 2014 Thinking with Berger Conference, with Juliette Kristensen, Cardiff Metropolitan University, 4 - 5 September 2014 Mega Events & Culture: Arts & Artists Engagement in Events - based Regeneration, Resistance & Research Regional Studies Association, Research Seminar, Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, London, 17 June 2014 Image — Movement — Story Conference, University
of Roehampton, 14 June 2014 SPSL / A to Y Public Lecture, MAI (Montreal Arts Interculturels / University
of Concordia, Montreal QC, 12 April 2013 Inter-Asian Connections IV Conference, in the strand «Contemporary Art and the Inter-Asian Imaginary», Koç University, Istanbul.
Check
out the schedule
of panels and
discussions here.
Inevitably, focus in the
discussions is on problems with MW, but it is worth stating upfront
here (as is also stated in a number
of the papers) that MW made positive contributions to the
discussion as well — they introduced a number
of new methods (and provided code that allows everyone to try them
out), and their use
of the Monte Carlo / Markov Chain (MCMC) Bayesian approach to assess uncertainties in the reconstructions is certainly interesting.
I know you probably threw that idea
out for
discussion, but I think the beneficial effect
of CO2 warming
here will only be small.
You are wasting your time with verbal
discussions here — you can actually work
out the microcanonical description
of this particular gas, and have avoided becoming engaged in the
discussions of the Velasco paper only because you wished to help instruct me on my ignorance first, because
of the egregious errors in my thermodynamic reasoning.
I'd like to keep that trend going, it's refreshing for me to be having that sort
of discussion on WUWT — it's how things started
out for me
here and I've been missing it
of late.
One
of the things we'd like to accomplish
here is a more nuanced
discussion of the evidence, rather than calling it «good» or «bad» as if some
of the evidence went to church and the rest went
out to the tavern and got drunk.]