Sentences with phrase «out of the discussion here»

I appreciate that you bowed out of the discussion here, however.
Since not many of us earn the required status, that means most of us can't book first class awards... so we are leaving it out of the discussion here.

Not exact matches

Stephen Gordon has pointed out here on Econowatch that many tax policy discussions of late have involved hiking taxes that are perceived to be paid by someone else (the rich; corporations).
Here, at the early stages of discussion, he stressed, the board spoke to only two prospective buyers — Silver Lake and Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts — and KKR dropped out early.
Here is a Deutsche Bundesbank discussion paper that looks at the «Small Bang,» a 2009 revision of contract terms for European CDS that improved liquidity in that market, to try to figure out which effect is more important:
This has been a topic that keeps getting a lot of discussion so I figured I'd cover some of the basics here just to get some answers out there for those who are curious.
Preston: [00:19:26] So if I wanted to have a transaction with you and I wanted it to be included on the blockchain but there's they're running out of space on the blockchain if I include a tip, like hey here's an extra dollar here's an extra $ 2 for this transaction I'm trying to have with my buddy that was that tip went to the minors which I'm not even going to get into the discussion about minors here.
The whole discussion that we should have on here is on de-dollarization, but the conflict that's going on right now and part of the answer out of that is what's going to happen to cryptocurrencies because it's a way of getting around the controls that the central banks really have on the creation of money, the value of that money and the debasements of those currencies.
I sometimes find the discussions on here become so convoluted that I just bow out of them!
I won't go into a detailed discussion of this here but I'll just point out that Paul asked in Romans 6 «How can we who died to sin still live in it?
Whitehead did work out a complex theory of value, but my point here is only to indicate that Whitehead's way of understanding human beings as part of nature both requires that we extend the ethical discussion and gives us clues as to how to do this.
I shall not delay the discussion here to defend Bergson against his critics, except to point out that what is frequently termed «irrationalism» in Bergson is precisely what he has in common with all modern disciplines that take the dimension of depth seriously.
I am out of those conversations from here on out; those discussions go nowhere fast.
But now here we go, you aren't willing to have a civil discussion but mock one's faith so that throws out any sort of argument you may have.
I get annoyed with the way he writes about a lot of things and that came out yesterday in a way that didn't add to a discussion, I can see why that isn't how things go around here, so I have no confusion over why it would be issued a warning.
Discussions regarding OG are always quite heated on here, but I'd like to point out that he did indeed score 14 goals in 27 appearances: however, only 21 of those matches were starts.
Discussion is lively here, but everything some fans say is all based in the tinted perspective of Wenger Out.
While I believe all the issues on The Lunch Tray are worthy of discussion (even if some are a little sillier than others), and even though we've certainly discussed childhood hunger here and will continue to do so, any site claiming to be dedicated to «kids and food, in school and out» really ought to take affirmative steps to help kids with no food at all.
Update: This post led to a discussion of the mysterious «Perfection Salad» that appears on the menu — check it out here, and even more retro - Jello - fun here.]
For the record, here's what Paterson had to say about borrowing just last week, insisting he had never ruled it out, altogether, but was chagrined that it had become the focus of discussion (thanks, of course, to his hand - picked LG, Richard Ravitch):
It's a great opportunity for somebody who's just starting out in the field, since NET web interns typically get to work on dozens of different projects in the course of their stay here, as well as participate in communications strategy discussions, planning meetings, brainstorming sessions and occasional field trips to wherever I feel like getting coffee that morning.
Let's be clear: Even though neither of those unions have formally endorsed Cuomo, they are clearly fronting for him here and attempting to move the discussion away from the mosque — a touchy subject for Democrats ever since President Obama weighed in, and out, and in again — and onto the politicization of Ground Zero, which is basically the equivalent of kicking a hornets» nest.
There is no space to set out in detail what our values ought to be here, but in subsequent posts I hope contributors will add to the discussion in the spirit of Alex Wilcock's «what the Liberal Democrats stand for» meme.
So, with this I think the next wiser step left for Osoba is to lead his people out of (Egypt) APC to promised land.Moreso, with what his on grand now in ogun state toward 2015 election, am sorry for Amosu, especially when all who is who in ogun politics are ready to work with Osoba and there is strong alliance discussion going on in opposition party, but people even in Amosun cabinet were leaving APC day by day, I foresee what happened in Ekiti and kwara between Olushola SARAKI and then governor Lawal again in ogun come 2015, The victory of Aregbesola for APC in osun is so diffrent with this: some few month to election in osun many politician especially former governors were started joining APC to support Aregbesola while reverse is the case in ogun here, many even in cabinet are leaving the government to oppose Amosun, just imagine ew months to election now all former governors were agaist Amosun, all senators, Reps, and many assembly members were leaving APC agaist him and this is just the begining.Though,» ETI O WUN A WI TI OLUWA LASE» yet All EYI O WUN TI A NWI NI 2001, ILE OSOBA NI OLUWA TI FI ADE SI NI 2011.
BOSTON — A heated discussion broke out here today at the annual meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics over a hot - button topic: When will we know enough about rare cancer risk genes to begin routinely testing for them in patients with a family history of cancer?
Scientists have through their research figured out that RNA, a close relative of DNA could have been a first step towards life but RNA needs to go or anything needs to go into something protected so that it can do its replicating thing; and here is where Steve's discussion of fat comes in.
I'd like to be even - handed here and point out that the comment in # 6 does not help any discussion of climate science.
Though there are many programs out there that separate the development of different performance parameters into different mesocycles (medium length training cycles) throughout the year, that is not the scope of this discussion - rather, the emphasis here will be on adjusting your current training routine to improve strength, speed and power simultaneously, without dropping the specific training activities you would otherwise be doing.
The blog includes commentary and discussion about the topics above, as well as actual «Experiments» — but just in case you've missed out on any of the Experiments which we've already announced, here are some links for you to catch up
Check out the comments here for more of a discussion on eHarmony's matching system, including some comments from matching experts like Helen Fisher.
A growing community of readers and commenters has made its home here at Mario Party Legacy, and while we all love the discussion and the activity, it can get a bit out of control.
Here, as in many other areas of interest, professional practice is more varied and complicated than the simplified patterns that often stand out in scholarly discussions.
Click here to watch her recent discussion of the Long Island «opt - out» movement on «Behind the News Long Island,» with Sergio Argueta and Estrella Ollivares - Orellana.
It turns out we can test everything to and from 60 mph here, so for brevity's sake we'll stick to a discussion of those results.
With major new initiatives coming out of the agencies represented here — Blair on new production, Aitken Alexander's international expansion, and what is, in fact, a BBC production deal for Curtis Brown, as well (on Susanna Clarke's Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell)-- I hope to return to more of this panel's discussion of the agent's developing role in the business in coming days.
Besides, there's NO ONE here that can have a discussion on a proper author classification, and not certainly on «making a living out of their books» which touches nothing on the quality of the work.
If you need to spend less time in online discussions, here are 13 ways to ensure you get kicked out of a few groups.
On this point, here are some take - outs from my experience of the three days of listening and discussion.
This is here for two reasons (1) to be used in a discussion about reading the guarantee and responsible breeding and placement of dogs and (2) to point out that if a pet shop can provide this guarantee you surely shouldn't settle for even less from the breeder you choose.
A growing community of readers and commenters has made its home here at Mario Party Legacy, and while we all love the discussion and the activity, it can get a bit out of control.
If you're a WMD Member, you can check out the in - depth discussion details in the WMD Portal thread here, For those who missed out on signing up for Project CARS, some footage of Ben Collins trying out the game's Formula C car and post-play comments on aspects such as the tyre physics has been released by Darren White 9Project CARS» Art Director), and can be seen below.
If you find the discussion interesting and would like a more robust (full hour) talk on the same subject, you can get the slides and notes for the entire GDC 2011 talk here (also linked on the right) or check out the full video of the talk on the GDC Vault, where it is now available for free.
This year's discussion on most anticipated was close too, but there's more a sense of frustration since a lot of the games we're picking from here year after year are the same — because they still aren't out.
«Speaking out: Siting the Voice in Contemporary Asian Art», Courtauld Institute of Art and Kings College, University of London 2017 Conceptualism — Intersectional Readings, International Framings Conference, AHRC Black Artists and Modernism project in collaboration with Van Abbemuseum, NL, 7 - 9 December 2017 Trinh T Minh - ha Symposium, ICA London, 3 December 2017 Women in Collections Symposium, Contemporary Art Society / Sackler CPD Programme, Leeds City Art Gallery, 19 October 2017 Deviant Researching Symposium, part of Demodernising the Collection, Van Abbemuseum, NL, 21 - 23 September 2016 Now and Then, Here and There Conference, AHRC Black Artists and Modernism, Chelsea College of Art and Design, UAL / Clore auditorium, Tate Britain, 6 - 8 October 2016 Kung Fury: Contemporary Debates in Martial Arts Cinema Symposium, AHRC Martial Arts Studies Network, Birmingham City University, 1 April 2015 Martial Arts Studies Conference, with Luke White, Cardiff University, 10 - 12 June 2015 How to See the World Panel discussion & book launch, with Nicholas Mirzeoff, Jon Bird, Sonia Boyce, Nadja Milner - Larsen, ICA, London 4 June 2015 (In) Direct Speech: «Chineseness» in Contemporary Art Symposium, University of Lisbon, 16 - 19 March 2014 Thinking with Berger Conference, with Juliette Kristensen, Cardiff Metropolitan University, 4 - 5 September 2014 Mega Events & Culture: Arts & Artists Engagement in Events - based Regeneration, Resistance & Research Regional Studies Association, Research Seminar, Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, London, 17 June 2014 Image — Movement — Story Conference, University of Roehampton, 14 June 2014 SPSL / A to Y Public Lecture, MAI (Montreal Arts Interculturels / University of Concordia, Montreal QC, 12 April 2013 Inter-Asian Connections IV Conference, in the strand «Contemporary Art and the Inter-Asian Imaginary», Koç University, Istanbul.
Check out the schedule of panels and discussions here.
Inevitably, focus in the discussions is on problems with MW, but it is worth stating upfront here (as is also stated in a number of the papers) that MW made positive contributions to the discussion as well — they introduced a number of new methods (and provided code that allows everyone to try them out), and their use of the Monte Carlo / Markov Chain (MCMC) Bayesian approach to assess uncertainties in the reconstructions is certainly interesting.
I know you probably threw that idea out for discussion, but I think the beneficial effect of CO2 warming here will only be small.
You are wasting your time with verbal discussions here — you can actually work out the microcanonical description of this particular gas, and have avoided becoming engaged in the discussions of the Velasco paper only because you wished to help instruct me on my ignorance first, because of the egregious errors in my thermodynamic reasoning.
I'd like to keep that trend going, it's refreshing for me to be having that sort of discussion on WUWT — it's how things started out for me here and I've been missing it of late.
One of the things we'd like to accomplish here is a more nuanced discussion of the evidence, rather than calling it «good» or «bad» as if some of the evidence went to church and the rest went out to the tavern and got drunk.]
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z