Sentences with phrase «out of the discussion so»

One aspect that has been left out of the discussion so far is function.

This fact, left out of the discussion so far about Cothorne's allegations, is one that should be considered.

Not exact matches

«So Mark, may I suggest that we lay out the process for how we'll have this discussion of whether we have a great mutual fit to work together?

There is no precedent in the euro zone to address the debt pile of a bailed - out county and that's why discussions on Greece's debt are taking so long, the Luxembourg finance minister told CNBC.

The dinner series, which features live music, guest speakers and panel discussions, has sold out for every one of the 11 events held so far — one of which Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney attended.

So if higher wages are out of the question at your company, try to first center a discussion about rewards around nonmonetary perks.

There is no precedent in the euro zone to address the debt pile of a bailed - out county and that's why the discussions on Greek debt are taking so long, the Luxembourg finance minister told CNBC.

It's unlikely the CSA will get out ahead of the SEC so it could take some time yet before something substantial actually happens but the discussion thus far has been viewed by all to be positive.

«There are certainly things that are illegal content, so that is more of an area where talking about regulations could make sense, but so much of what comes up in general discussion about this is out of reach of government action from the get - go.»

This has been a topic that keeps getting a lot of discussion so I figured I'd cover some of the basics here just to get some answers out there for those who are curious.

The sentiment seemed widespread on tech and media Twitter: there was a lack of specificity in terms of questions about privacy (this allowed Zuckerberg to turn nearly every question about the ownership of data to a discussion about user interface controls that limit where data is shown to other Facebook users), plenty of dodged questions (every time there was a question about the data Facebook generates about users beyond what they themselves enter into the system Zuckerberg needed to «check with his team»), and bad questions that presumed Facebook sells data, letting Zuckerberg run out the clock at least three times by explaining the basics of Facebook's business model (this is precisely why I have been so outspoken about the problem of perpetrating this falsehood: it lets Facebook off the hook).

Preston: [00:19:26] So if I wanted to have a transaction with you and I wanted it to be included on the blockchain but there's they're running out of space on the blockchain if I include a tip, like hey here's an extra dollar here's an extra $ 2 for this transaction I'm trying to have with my buddy that was that tip went to the minors which I'm not even going to get into the discussion about minors here.

The discussion started off asking why the number of women on public boards was so low — around 18 % (or lower)-- Gouw stated that this is typically because when there are open spots on boards, the typically all - male board members reach out to their own networks and it propagates adding more men to boards.

One of the reasons is that there is so much bad news priced into the euro, clearly you may want to wait out what's happening with the discussions with Greece on how that is playing out.

Well, I got ta go and be gay (you know... go to work, clean the house, cook dinner... and watch «Glee»), so I'm going to bow out of this discussion.

NO, I wasn't there so the only «facts» I know are what is written in this article but as a rule - of - thumb discussions regarding political views, religion, etc are best left out of the office.

I sometimes find the discussions on here become so convoluted that I just bow out of them!

Many have pointed out the hypocrisy of this and that's why there is so much heated discussion.

(Note: Just so we're clear, I'm not saying that anyone who opposes gay marriage or the Tea Party or «happy holidays» is doing so out of fear; just saying that as citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven, fear need not be a factor in our discussion of these issues.)

I was just doing this as part of my trilogy; it started with Buddha and then Jesus, and now it turns out serendipitously that the timing is appropriate because there is so much discussion about Islam in the world.

Then the conference was divided into small groups of twenty or twenty - five, so that everyone had an opportunity to contribute to the discussion, which enriched the findings that came out of these discussions, representing, as far as possible, the general mind of the gathering.

In a recent discussion on «impunity» against the former corrupt political regime in Argentina, individual after individual present spoke out in shame against their silence in the face of oppression — each one felt that they had succumbed to the fear of repression, maybe of the possibility of «disappearance» — but now they recognized that their silence had sanctioned so much of the violence.

I think given equal opportunities there will be a natural inclination for many towards traditional roles and that this is healthy, has nothing to do with any artificial social construct but is natural and comes out of biology and now might be the time to be having open discussions about this kind of thing without having to face the fear of being labelled misogynistic for doing so or with feeling fearful of any threat to equality.

Now, could it possibly be that the reason the answer is out of reach is because the bible was written by numerous, imperfect human beings, under the influence of their own religious biases, and all those writings have been complied, hundreds of years later, by men of equal imperfectness and religious biases, so as to render any logical discussion about what the hell was their intention in writing what the wrote, completely implausible?

It is good this issue is coming out because it is something that needs to be discussed but there's so much yelling and arguing on both sides I'm afraid you would get as much discussion from a group of first graders.

So since I feel a little out of my depth tackling this one by myself, I'm going to leave my response in a comment and then open Sharon's question up for discussion.

The only reason we limit the discussion to the so - called «side A» and «side B» debate is because, as Cindy mentions above, the most you could ever squeeze out of Scripture is a prohibition on same - sex acts (which I still think takes quite a bit of squeezing).

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

Sometimes those women who have initiated the idea will do so, throwing out for discussion whatever issues are of concern to them.

I genuinely was interested in this subject because of late it has somewhat been playing on my mind and so sought to discover the truth on the matter and so sought out discussions and literature by christian writers that I might examine their different stances on the issue and try to find a moral cross-section as I think is appropriate for all questions since the ranging views are like politics ranging from far left wing to far right wing views.

But now here we go, you aren't willing to have a civil discussion but mock one's faith so that throws out any sort of argument you may have.

The Red Sox are out on him, so unless the Cardinals» interest is stronger than currently reported or a new team enters the discussions and puts a similar set of terms and money on the table, things aren't working out exactly as Boras and Hosmer thought they would when this offseason kicked off.

I get annoyed with the way he writes about a lot of things and that came out yesterday in a way that didn't add to a discussion, I can see why that isn't how things go around here, so I have no confusion over why it would be issued a warning.

This year's silly season is set to be a particularly silly one as several top drivers are out of contract at the end of the season, so Alonso's decision is likely play a big part in any discussions.

I'm saying I think there are a handful of fighters who could be in that discussion but once you get to that stage it's just opinion you can't really determine it because there are so many moving parts, I don't think having a loss or two takes you out of the top tier in any way, great fighters can lose

Sanches was left out of the Bayern squad at the weekend due to transfer discussions, and so it would be a huge move if Liverpool are able to land his signature before Thursday as Jurgen Klopp has seemingly been desperate to bolster his midfield all summer.

To an alternate topic of discussion i will just like to point out n remind arsenal fans dat ARSENAL is a top top club and shud be compared to only the likes of man u, chelsea, barca, real, bayern n maybe liverpool, we hav acceptd medocrity 4 far 2 long, finishing 4th n elimination in d 2nd stage of UCL is a failure, we shud be aiming for top2 and d semi finals of UCL... wenger has taking us so low... after d FA cup win we shud hav sign 3 world class players n bloster our squad, if we hav per, olivier, ramsey on the bench as back up 4 world class players then we know were movin forward

Whilst a lot of the media discussion from Week 4 of the Premier League has revolved around boring games, the low level of goals scored so far, and even the amount of time that the ball is actually in play, it's actually been a very busy weekend for the Manager Impact Index with Villas Boas, David Moyes and Michael Laudrup being the stand out performers this week.

Growing up it was just my mom and I so I grew up not flushing every time but when I got older, went to college I got out of the habit since it isn't exactly socially acceptable at this point and I was embarrassed to bring it up in a discussion with any of my roommates.

There seems to be lots of discussion about making sure a taxi has rear seatbelts to be able to use car seats however I imagine most of these are older vehicles that don't have the latches for car seats — my kids are 2.5 years old so out of the infant buckets.

While I believe all the issues on The Lunch Tray are worthy of discussion (even if some are a little sillier than others), and even though we've certainly discussed childhood hunger here and will continue to do so, any site claiming to be dedicated to «kids and food, in school and out» really ought to take affirmative steps to help kids with no food at all.

OK, so this is sorta out of left field, but remember way back when we had the discussion about going vegetarian («Tentative Forays into a Meat - Free Life» and «TLT Reader Thoughts on Going Vegetarian»)?

Instead, it was excited discussions of traditions or surprises... that one Christmas where Santa tied strings (a different color for each child) to the gifts under the tree so that the kids had to follow them to figure out which were theirs, the special tablecloth we use for our «fancy family dinner,» the ongoing debate about which Christmas carols are the best, and the treasured tradition of everyone staying in their PJs all day (even Dad) on Christmas Day.

I agree with amberjee that oversupply is often left out of the discussion because so much attention (rightly so) is put on those having trouble with undersupply.

In those cases, be sure to summon up your sense of humor as soon as things start to get heated, and close the «public» phase of your discussion with a big hug, so your child can relax, knowing that no matter how difficult the discussion, the adults are still committed to working things out positively.

My feeling about milk in schools, as shared by many TLT readers (judging from this morning's discussion on the Facebook page and in comments on the blog), is that milk does have a place on lunch trays, but not to the exclusion of other beverages like water (which, as it turns out, is not so easy to get into cafeterias) and plant - based milks for those who drink them.

Typical maternity care today has departed so far from physiology that in many cases it causes more harm than good, as borne out by Dr. Buckley's discussions throughout the book of the impact (i.e., unintended consequences) of common maternity care practices on hormonal physiology and mother - baby outcomes.

Will manufacturers of pocket diaper systems and more AI2's jump on the bandwagon and answer the call that has gone out so many times in online discussions?

Based on how similar actions have rolled out over the past 25 or so years, and discussions that arose about the authority at the time of those actions, this is how I believe the situation is, not how the world would be if I got to make all the rules.

«So, when a certain smear article came out in the Queens Tribune about my religion beliefs, there was discussion in my camp about the interests of the party.»