Sentences with phrase «out of the joint decision»

This can manifest itself in unexpected change orders, requests for additional funds for operational support, expansion of scope or other increased costs arising out of the joint decision of the parties.

Not exact matches

Questions have been raised about the outlook for the FF91, given LeEco's spiraling cash problems as well as its decision to pull out of a joint project with British sports carmaker Aston Martin to develop RapidE electric car.

Having recently called out the federal government for failing to provide a justification for its decision to approve Shell's Jackpine mine oil sands expansion project (an approach that serves no interest other than the government's, as even industry would stand to benefit from knowing why one project is justified while another, e.g. Taseko's original Prosperity mine, is not), it was reassuring to see that at least this Joint Review Panel (JRP) shares my understanding of this obligation under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, SC 2012, c 19.

The Park District's construction plans were derailed by the referendum loss and the decision this spring by the Grayslake Library District Board to back out of a joint venture to build a combination library - community center in Central Park.

The head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, responsible for carrying out orders to kill suspects on the list, no longer contributes to the decision of whether or not to kill them.

Unite's joint general secretary Tony Woodley was even more effusive, welcoming his decision to come out against many of New Labour's policies «at long last».

The Joint Record of Decision and Findings Statement together mark the final step in the EIS process and lay out the project alternatives considered along with the chosen alternative.

With the debate over welfare savings likely to form one of the central political battlegrounds of 2013, the deputy prime minister, speaking at a joint press conference with David Cameron at Downing Street, said: «I don't think it helps at all to try and portray that decision as one that divides one set of people against another, the deserving and the undeserving poor, people in work and out of work.»

[14][15] But in October 2011 ArcelorMittal pulled out from the US$ 5 billion joint bid at the last minute, a decision made as a result of being in debt and no longer has the capacity to allocate capital for a «minority business interest», according to a statement released by the company.

Paragraph 2: Parties are encouraged to take action to implement and support, including through results - based payments, the existing framework as set out in related guidance and decisions already agreed under the Convention for: policy approaches and positive incentives for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries; and alternative policy approaches, such as joint mitigation and adaptation approaches for the integral and sustainable management of forests, while reaffirming the importance of incentivizing, as appropriate, non-carbon benefits associated with such approaches.

This joint post by Blaqwell and KMJD Consulting (Part 3 of a 3 - part strategy series) explains how to flesh out a directional decision to grow deep into a detailed strategy.

Destabilizing Elements (II) • The end of joint & several liability • Reinforced equal sharing / lockstep • Discourages flight — you remain liable for debts incurred while at the firm • With personal liability, incentive is to try to rehabilitate a declining firm • Without it, logic dictates early departure — first out the door • Most importantly: The end of periodic shared decisions to stay together

When the money is taken out of the joint account, the amount that is taken out and by whom, and how the money is used are all up for consideration by the court in a divorce case in Florida, so having the advice of an attorney before making any drastic decisions is recommended.

On 1 February 2017 the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published a joint policy statement setting out a number of changes to their enforcement decision - making processes (the Policy Statement).

We also include within the definition an organized system of health care in which more than one covered entity participates, and in which the participating covered entities hold themselves out to the public as participating in a joint arrangement, and in which the joint activities of the participating covered entities include at least one of the following: utilization review, in which health care decisions by participating covered entities are reviewed by other participating covered entities or by a third party on their behalf; quality assessment and improvement activities, in which treatment provided by participating covered entities is assessed by other participating covered entities or by a third party on their behalf; or payment activities, if the financial risk for delivering health care is shared in whole or in part by participating covered entities through the joint arrangement and if protected health information created or received by a covered entity is reviewed by other participating covered entities or by a third party on their behalf for the purpose of administering the sharing of financial risk.

A divorced parent who is out of the state or country on business may delegate to a stepparent the absent parent's decision making authority for making joint, major decisions affecting the child's health, education or general welfare, with the ex-spouse.