Sentences with phrase «out of the question even»

One handed mode too is pretty much out of the question even though there is a one handed mode.

Not exact matches

Even apart from the fact that they don't know what they're talking about because they don't know what's out there, the bigger issues are that: (a) almost all of these reports come back with a variety of related findings that may be precisely on point; and (b) the very age of the prior research may be invaluable if the new questions and inquiries have to do with trend lines, changes in attitudes or different behaviors.

One Republican, Missouri Rep. Billy Long, even brought out a large poster of Diamond & Silk to display behind himself while questioning Zuckerberg.

Create a set of questions to ask yourself (is this a priority, does it fit into my vision, am I saying yes out of guilt or another unhealthy thought process) before obligating yourself to a yes, and always take the time to evaluate even the smallest of commitments.

Questions like this barely scratch the surface of the advice on offer — I didn't even mention the seemingly endless parade of apps and gizmos offering to help you get more done that you could test out and evaluate.

Sanger - Katz lays out eight questions that are on a lot of folks» minds after President Trump's latest efforts to undercut the Affordable Care Act — an executive order Thursday morning, followed by an announcement last evening that the government would stop making certain ACA - related payments to insurers — and answers them.

One evening this past January, he sent out an e-mail inviting customers to fill out a poll consisting of 34 multiple - choice questions.

Even better, solicit questions from the audience to keep both past and prospective customers engaged, ensuring the company doesn't run out of material.

The emergence of any new platform inevitably brings questions about its utility — and even the businesses that first roll it out often fail to predict how it will ultimately be used.

And Lanier saw an opportunity to go even further with Tonic: having it figure out on the fly which questions were relevant on the basis of the answers to previous questions, and then immediately flag potential health problems.

Even if loans and venture capital are out of the question, you're not even halfway down your list of optiEven if loans and venture capital are out of the question, you're not even halfway down your list of optieven halfway down your list of options.

«Instead of spending months or even years on a hunch that may turn out to be wrong, you're able to answer your questions really quickly — to stop debating in the abstract, and start making progress.»

Here are five critical questions to ask yourself before deciding what type of business is right for you, or if you are even cut out to be a business owner:

Dino Sajudin's story of an out - of - wedlock Trump child raises even more of those questions, as well as the question of just how many payoff deals Trump or allied institutions like AMI have made.

Even though these particular loans are being taken out at amazing rates, a lot of small business owners still have a number of questions when it comes to borrowing money to cover their small business needs.

Yet the US involvement was incongruous with president Trump's own stances, who questioned former president Barack Obama's birthplace for years without evidence, threw doubt on the accuracy of stories in US media outlets, and even doled out «fake news awards» in January to reputable news companies including the New York Times and Washington Post.

There are many questions and a mountain of papers to fill out and sign before you even know if the house you have your eye on, can be yours.

My question... is getting peoples insights into whether to diversify some more or something different altogether... there is simply so much time ahead of him, its hard to pin down a strategy, even the Vanguard Retirement 2065 is not far enough away to accommodate the time in front of him, he'll only be 56 by then, but I want to help him and set the strategy out before I shuffle off the mortal coil so he doesn't really need to think about pensions etc. as he grows up, comments / suggestions welcome... Cheers

Would it be totally out of the question to posit that Peltz wants to make sure that his billion - dollar burger and roast beef empire is liquid to move on an undervalued investment in restaurant land even if Peltz's other investment capital is tied up elsewhere?

Consider the following when building your buyer personas, and for even more in - depth information on the topic, check out this checklist of questions to ask when developing buyer personas:

 The Harper government's decision last year to write off every penny of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year's deficit calculation (which I questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already been proven wrong. Since the money was already «written off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it was an «investment,» not a bail - out), any repayment will come as a gain that can be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it's always politically better to make the budget situation look worse than it is (even when the bottom has fallen out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth of the public equity share).

I'm looking to simulate a world where everyone does this with out even questioning it and it just becomes baked into the culture and part of the natural experience of life.

People have the right to leave church and organized religion, they have a right to question an institution that will do anything to save face even if it means letting children be harmed (and trust me, there are Priests that have issues with girls - my mom when to an all girls» Catholic school in the 60s and talks about how many of the priests used to «hang out» with the young girls out and girls have been abused), churches that are not practicing social justice.

You can say, the Bible makes God out to be a bully, even though God isn't real, but then the question is why do authors of the Bible, including Moses, insist that God is a God of Love even when they tell of these stories of brutality?

To even question it will get you into trouble in a lot of circles... Martyn Shenstone and others have written exceptional studies demonstrating the dishonesty of this model... add this to the fact that this all happens where the richest 5 % of the planet are (which you are as well) and it is really out of whack...

And as Big Shiz, pointed out, yes, you're a racist if you even question that Zimmerman might have acted stupidly instead of as the biggest racist since Nathan Forrest.

So, I sincerely and respectfully ask of individuals who back anti-choice campaigns by citing personal moral or religious reasons this question, which I ask out honest curiosity: how can you recognize the consequences, historically, of legally banning a certain choice a person makes, and maintain that your moral code has not been violated, or even argue that your moral or religious code has been upheld, or elevated?

My question was aimed for the majority of peope that also disagree with you as much as me and cling to their faith so violently that if someone even broaches the subject, they immediatly lash out and try to either convert the unbeliever, condem him, or bring up the inane, breathtakingly stupid argument of «I can't prove there is a god, but you can't prove there isn't so we're at an impass» — I think that argument is probably the most frustrating thing EVER

Ok, so first off, I think in terms of proof, the only thing that would justify as proof to me would be direct contact with a «god being», but even then a lot of questioning and experimentation would be needed to rule out other possibilities.

Despite these questions, all of this sounds relatively favorable to Perry on my part, but these comments are simply the results of an evening's googling — no better than a procrastinated college paper as an attempt to figure out who the governor of my state actually is.

As for acting out of personal arrogance, the mistreatment, even abuse, of those on the fringes of society is what I was saying leads me to question the treatment of homosexual people.

Who knows, there might be other life forms out there on planets with differnt types of suns, other types of atmosphere, maybe even based on something other than carbon... Religion can't answer those questions, but science, ever so slowly, is plugging away at the answers.

How far complete clarity about oneself, as to whether one is in despair, may be united with being in despair, where this knowledge and self - knowledge might not avail precisely to tear a man out of his despair, to make him so terrified about himself that he would cease to be in despair — these questions we shall not decide here, we shall not even attempt to do so, since in the sequel we shall find a place for this whole investigation.

Bishop Paulose says, «It is by this reasoning, namely by a bold effort to answer the question of how Jesus Christ can become lord even of the religionless, that Bonhoeffer arrived at his conclusion that the church should work out and proclaim a «non-religious» interpretation of Biblical and theological concepts».

Occasionally Barr mentions a scholar who breaks out of fundamentalism into a genuinely critical stance (though usually extremely conservative)-- but only to call into question the honesty of such shifts without frank recognition of the break and even apology to critics whose work had been dismissed and motives impugned.

But «a moral discussion is inconclusive and even trivial, if it leaves out the question of its application,» as Gregory Vlastos has said.13 In order to be as specific as possible about this approach to Christian social philosophy I shall outline in arbitrary fashion five general principles which I suggest can be supported by the evidence of human experience as being necessary guides to the conditions under which the Good Society can grow.

Of course, similar judgments are constantly passed by theological reactionaries, and there are many who regard a theology even on secular terms (such as I should want to defend) as equally out of the questioOf course, similar judgments are constantly passed by theological reactionaries, and there are many who regard a theology even on secular terms (such as I should want to defend) as equally out of the questioof the question.

So in the final chapter, Lanzetta questions post-Conciliar approaches to ecumenism where the «dogmatic» (to do with knowing the truth) is juxtaposed to the «pastoral» «which starts out from the historic and pragmatic fact, and on behalf of this aims at possible dialogue, without changing teaching, but de facto neither improving understanding of it, but even with the risk of altering its significance by virtue of the dialogue method chosen...».

We looking outside world for answer, who can close the eyes and detach themselves from the world and simply merge in the goodness and love in heart and feel the best what we have, never worry or argue the different name of God or argue who is superior or inferior, the people who argues never even know himself or herself and started defying anything which cant be define, We can answer the very question of God and super power, it is not complicated, close the eyes, breath deeply and start detaching yourself from outside world and stop controlling your body, your thoughts, your so called worldly knowledge, ego and just feel the power and light within, you sure will get answer, it wont be Christ, Krishna, Allah, Those names wont matter, You will merge into supreme strength, and peace, we will have answer then, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND ANSWER LOOKING INSIDE OUT, WHEN ANSWER IS WITHIN,

For me, the point of asking that question is not to expunge Platonism or even to straighten out all the tangled knots that make so much of theology unthinkable without its Greek trappings.

If they can get people to disagree with them and argue with them, that affords them a chance to lay out even more of their positions on the topic in question when they respond to those comments.

Even if one calls into question Whitehead's hasty and exclusive identification of the actual entities of our epoch with the ultimate electromagnetic events, his radical and minutely carried out attempt at a novel conception of entity still retains all its interest.

Even if one does not actually obstruct the Curia's work we would question how up - building it is to one's own faith (and how helpful it is to those who have been entrusted to our pastoral care) to greet every initiative or document coming out of the Curia with instant suspicion.

Ironically, the very fact the bishops are making these «bold» statements is a testament to Israel's essential decency and humanity» the bishops know there will be no serious consequences or massive reprisals against Christians in Israel for «speaking out,» whereas any similar Christian criticism» or even questioning» of an Arab government in the region, or Islamic extremism, would» well, we all saw what happened after Regensburg.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

«Being someone who can not get Christianity out of my system — I no longer even really want to — it's an intimate thing to question God,» Tillman says.

I just ask a question that science is prevented from knowing due to barriers of time and distance, then pretend that it somehow means that the only possible explaination is an invisible all - powerful guy who pulls it out of his derriere while riding his unicorn and dividing the light into night and day before he invents the Sun and Earth, even though night and day only exist if there is a Sun and a rotating planet.

And he should learn to do this not only to defend the Christian position, but to understand and stand with his people as they take their place in the world, even though standing with them will sometimes have to be out of his weakness and lack of answers for the profound questions they are raising.

In answering this question about relative power among the deities, the early writing prophets moved out into practical monotheism, for they ascribed to Yahweh the successes and disasters even of their foes, and thought of him as in commanding control of all mankind.

Now David, even if we say that there are questions of interpretation (what does husband of one wife mean), I am sure we can agree that Paul (or whoever you think wrote it) is saying for leadership there are some people who are in and some people are out.