Not exact matches
And, in fact, a few
states, such as Georgia and Oklahoma, have pulled
out of the
consortia, indicating their desire to seek less - costly alternatives, such as a proposed
assessment package being developed by ACT.
They extended already long sales cycles for
state and district data and
assessment platforms by at least two years while buyers tried to figure
out the implications
of CCSS and the
assessment consortia on the architecture and functionality
of their statewide IIS platforms.
Indeed, critics
of Common Core were quick to point
out that the compromise agreements negotiated in Louisiana and Massachusetts did not stop the implementation
of Common Core (both
states will continue to use some elements
of the
consortia - designed
assessments).
Indiana recently became the first
of the 45
states that originally signed on to the Common Core to officially drop the standards (although the new standards they are set to adopt look very similar) and several
states are considering pulling
out of the two
consortia developing Common Core - aligned
assessments.
Oklahoma isn't pulling
out of the Common Core
assessment consortium PARCC, but
state education officials last week announced plans to design their own test.
Indiana isn't the only
state that's pulled
out of the two
assessment consortia in recent months.
The legislation
state lawmakers passed barring further implementation
of the new academic standards stops short
of pulling Indiana
out of the
consortium developing new
assessments.
Indiana pulled
out of PARCC, which is a
consortium of 26
states that is developing
assessments around the Common Core, just last week.
To date, 10
states have pulled
out of their original
assessment consortia (some were members
of both): Utah, Oklahoma, Georgia, Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Pennsylvania, Alaska, Florida and Kentucky.
With the development
of the Next Generation Science Standards and the roll
out of the two
consortia's CCSS
assessments, coming reforms in education will again highlight the role
of non-legislative
state actors and the need to apply methods like ours for understanding
states» efforts towards school improvement.
The costs
of implementing the standards, or costs associated with the two
consortia of states developing
assessments tied to Common Core, have caused a number
of states to drop
out.
This prediction will puzzle, upset, and maybe infuriate a great many readers — and,
of course, it could turn
out to be wrong — but enough clues, tips, tidbits, and intuitions have converged in recent weeks that I feel obligated to make it: I expect that PARCC and Smarter Balanced (the two federally subsidized
consortia of states that are developing new
assessments meant to be aligned with Common Core standards) will fade away, eclipsed and supplanted by long - established yet fleet - footed testing firms that already possess the infrastructure, relationships, and durability that give them huge advantages in the competition for
state and district business.