Not exact matches
Far from cherry - picking, this is how Scripture is SUPPOSED to be
read: IN context, NOT taking the line «this generation shall not pass»
OUT of the context in which He was speaking, which is what you are doing, and, as noted, is a common
error.
For those of you who are interested in
reading the arch of a sad, sad bitter life, crusie through the remarks by «the son a Piper man» aka Tom Tom, Stands for nothing, hates everything, curses when left with nothing to say, then hysterically claims victory for hurting someone's feelings, and stands for nothing, but will gladly point
out your poor syntax, grammar and spelling
errors like a weary retired 3rd grade teacher.
But although we started the second half looking a bit sharper and more fluent,
Reading were level after 10 minutes as a catalogue of
errors culminated in Szczesny failing to keep
out McCleary's deflected shot.
@kel, I agree alot with you but iv been
reading some of your comments and I drop short of all
out attack on Wenger and the board, its better to use examples of his
errors rather than ripping him
out of it and calling him every name under the sun.
Get a friend to
read over your work or, if there's no one at hand to be your sub-editor,
read it
out aloud — those grammatical
errors and typos will pop
out at you.
Now, it is apparent from
reading even the first few pages of The Skeptical Environmentalist that Lomborg proposes to make the case that not just environmentalists, but a considerable part of the heretofore respectable environmental - science community, have been misunderstanding the relevant concepts, misrepresenting the relevant facts, understating the uncertainties, selecting data, and failing to acknowledge
errors after these have been pointed
out in other words, that the scientist contributors to what he calls «the environmental litany» (namely, that environmental problems are serious and becoming, in many instances more so) have been guilty of massively violating the scientists code of conduct.
The idea is that by comparing their
readings, researchers can cancel
out some forms of
error due to motion — for example, when SQUIDs are put on aircraft.
The four mutations
out of 20,312
reads found in DEC1 (a putative tumor suppressor [46]-RRB- and the single mutation
out of 21,139
reads found in an extragenic region of chromosome 11 could be due to PCR and sequencing
errors or to very low levels (< 0.02 %) of ZFN - mediated cleavage events.
Hoehn's relaxed tone helped me
read through this quickly and even when she pointed
out errors I was making, I never felt personally judged.
Post-Script: If you'd like to
read a bit more about Ms. Jones» past acting endeavors, head over to AntennaFree.TV and check
out my Pilot
Error feature on her 2007's cop - drama pilot, «Protect and Serve.»
In guided
reading, I gather students on the same
reading level who are not progressing in
reading on their own and have them
read out loud to me, and we discuss
errors and make corrections.
Practice & Revision: Even published authors
read their writing
out loud to check for
errors or confusion.
Reading your script
out loud is also a great way to catch grammatical
errors and repetitive word choices that you might have otherwise skimmed over.
If this is correct, I could easily trust the car to my local non-branded repair mechanic; he would be able to detect
errors in the motor by
reading out some onboard unit (as it's done in old - fashioned cars anyways, these days), and if something bad happens, I would then, and only then, go to the branded shop.
If you
read this sentence
out loud, you'll see NO ONE would naturally take a pause or a breath AFTER grammatical and before
ERRORS.
But most professional writers didn't start
out wealthy, so they learned their craft through workshops, extensive
reading, critique groups, and years of trial and
error.
That was just something that popped in my head as I
read a book written by a screenplay consultant I hired years ago and he wanted a review so I
read it to help him
out but found maybe 5 or 6
error's myself in the 200 page book.
Apparently it was due to an
error in the app timing
out when we added too many new apps... [
Read more...]
The recent new edition mentioned above is a perfect example, as it had been through just about all the processes we have, and yet
reading it
out loud revealed ~ 23 more
errors.
I've
read ebooks (by legitimate ebook publishers) that have gone through the editing process and come
out the published end with plenty of
errors.
Having
read many books with many
errors it them, I was so very careful when I edited my book and I'm pleased with the way it turned
out.
Proof
reading is final and crucial stages of paper writing as it is meant to weed
out punctuation, grammar and spelling
errors.
And instead of trying through trial - and -
error to figure
out... [
Read more...]
I just gave up, but never really found
out why it was rejected, it
read their guidelines and could not find any
error.
The kind of thing authors are only going to figure
out through much trial and
error if they don't
read this.
Data Conversion Laboratory issued a press release earlier this week that indicates that
reading consumers are speaking
out against poorly formatted and
error - ridden ebooks, sometimes even those works that have been commercially produced through major publishing houses.
Developmental edits can be time - consuming because the editor is
reading your manuscript not only from a typical «editor's» standpoint (fixing grammatical
errors), but as a «reader» who is determining whether it is an entertaining book that achieves what it set
out to achieve (this will depend on the genre; for example, romance novels want to entice readers with sensual characters and chemistry, while a murder mystery's goal is to instill fear and intrigue in the reader's mind).
Some people swear by printing
out their texts to proofread on paper, others claim
reading backwards helps (as it disconnects the words from what your brain expects to see, so
errors are easier to catch).
There's nothing worse than
reading a book with obvious spelling and grammar
errors that rip you
out of being immersed in a story.
I'm a professional editor and proofreader, so when I
read a manuscript on screen, I have the advantage of seeing it with fresh eyes — but when I print
out a copy, I often find
errors I missed on screen.
Our expert team provides creatively laid
out,
error - free, well - designed Amazon Kindle e-book formats for enjoyable
reading.
When you
read your credit report, keep an eye
out for
errors that might be hurting your credit score.
Read their case studies and find
out common mistakes and strategic
errors committed by them.
Before you dash
out, full speed ahead, to preview homes and apply for a mortgage, take a few minutes to
read this entire article, because with planning, you will save yourself costly
errors.
I'm finding that my spreadsheet data is in
error because after
reading the fine print, it turns
out Petplan doesn't cover routine examinations, which is the bulk of a pet's veterinary care in most years.
No need for a stupid card which will fail to
read or write stuff while you're gaming online and then you get «kicked
out» all of a sudden because of that ridiculous memory card
error code C2 -12828-1.
p.s. in the midst of the deluge at RC, it took awhile for me to sort
out what might be an actual
error / mistake, especially since i don't have time to
read the threads in details (i am mostly relying on emails that point
out something I should respond to).
They further described Lomborg's text as having «misrepresented the actual positions of environmentalists and scientists» with an analysis that was «marred by invalidating
errors that include a narrow, biased
reading of the literature, an inadequate understanding of the science, and quotations taken
out of context.»
Provided we know the size and shape of the
error in that original
reading (Normal, log Normal etc) we can generate a spread of random values around our actual
reading reflecting what it might be, and then for each of those
read off the age that implies, using a table that randomly selects from the (smeared
out) calibration curve at that value.
What's important is what you * didn't *
read, i.e. what Wegman left
out — any analysis of the actual impact of the
error.
Please point
out any
errors in my logic with this as I am always trying to deepen my understanding.Also just
read an article in yale e360 which states that the artic tundra has the same precipitation level as a desert.
So even if 1 or 2 referees did not catch missteps A or B, the community of «referees» in the same research field who
read the published paper (or hear a presentation at a conference) will «catch» the
errors and eventually publish their own work of refutation, whether pointing
out flaws in methodology or presenting new data or both.
Using English would allow «the unlearned by bare
reading without right understanding might suck
out errors, and trusting in their conceit, might endamage themselves, and sometimes fall into destruction.»
Really «good» typographical
errors jump
out at the reader because they are not what we expect to
read.
I find listening to someone (in this case a robot)
read out my work helps me identify sentences that do not flow well, and spot grammatical or even typographical
errors.
Students in the midst of law school, with its mountain of
reading on cases and substantive law, might be surprised to learn that «
errors of law» are not the biggest pitfall to watch
out for in the world of private practice.
I know most people hate those of us who care about grammar, but that aside, when I start
reading what I expect is an intelligent review for productivity software, and the first thing I see in the «Summary» is a high school level grammar
error all credibility goes
out the window.
After writing your email,
read it through
out loud to ensure that your
errors don't overshadow your message.
It's easy to quickly skim through your resume on your computer screen, and
read it silently, but
reading your words
out loud might help you discover some
errors.
Don't let mistakes take you
out: The people who'll
read your resume are likely seasoned professionals with plenty of experience, and you better believe that they'll be able to laser focus on any typo,
error, or mistake you leave behind — and when they're uncovered, the chances of your being seriously considered for the job will likely plummet.