Value - based care is an emerging payment model that focuses on measuring a patient's health
outcome against the cost of delivering the outcome.
«If you apply our tool [and] measure
your outcomes against your costs,» she said, «you can clearly make an argument for many of these new advances.»
Not exact matches
Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature,
cost and
outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted
against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected
costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.
When choosing between alternative actions, we have to compare the positive
outcomes of those actions and weigh them
against their
costs.
«Dengue control programs weighing the operational feasibility and
cost of entomological monitoring
against the limited utility of these indicators may wish to seek alternative monitoring frameworks that incorporate human dengue - related
outcomes, such as passive case detection and, when possible, sero - surveys and active case detection.»
In my practice, I will resist
against the systemic prioritization of academic
outcomes and behavioral control at the
cost of young peoples» identity development, empowerment, and community formation.
Against a mandate of creating a
cost - effective yet engaging course for a Fire Fighting Institute, Sandy readies a storyboard that maps to the content accurately to the required learning
outcomes.
When weighing the expense
against the
outcome, it raises the question of
cost effectiveness.
You've made an assessment that the
cost of paying the insurance ocmpany is worth the protection,
against the worst possible
outcome, should the uncertain occur.
Following a successful claim
against a fund manager, the High Court made a non-party
costs order
against five investors in the fund who had met the
costs of the defence, had an interest in the
outcome of the claim (which need not be financial), and had control over the litigation by making major decisions.
The court has, in many cases, been prepared to hear argument and see evidence from them (usually on limited issues) and has also been prepared to consider
costs awards
against them and in their favour depending upon the
outcome of their involvement.
Contact us to get a genuine assessment of what you are up
against, what the likely
outcome and
costs will be, and how long it will take.
As a lawyer, it concerns me that my client could potentially have
costs awarded
against him or her where the best advice I could give regarding the likely
outcome, based on the existing jurisprudence, is so qualified, so uncertain.
You also agree to cover all of my
costs associated with bringing an action, including attorneys» fees and any damages awarded
against me, irrespective of the
outcome of the action.
Aviva, through their lawyers, said the only acceptable
outcome was for the Plaintiff to accept $ 0 and in return, Aviva would not pursue legal
costs against her.
Aos et al. (2004) monetized the benefits of home visiting, finding that evidence - based models of home visiting (i.e., NFP) have benefits that far outweigh the
costs of implementation when measured
against seven pre-defined
outcomes, including reduced child abuse / neglect, educational achievement, and reduced crime.
Proposes that
outcomes (rewards and
costs) arising from a given relationship, contrasted
against the possible
outcomes in other available relationships, predict whether or not the relationship will last.
While prudent people weigh the
costs of the endeavour
against the value of the
outcome, I guess that doesn't apply if you're forcing someone else to spend their money for your
outcome.
Because prudent people weigh the
costs of the endeavour
against the value of the
outcome.