Sentences with phrase «outcome evaluations of»

In terms of quality and dosage, similar to outcome evaluations of preschool programs, there is increasing evidence of the efficacy of full - day kindergarten in boosting children's academic achievement.

Her basic science research included the scientific investigation of pancreatitis related respiratory failure and her health services research focused on the development of a national trauma registry for children and outcome evaluation of children's trauma - related care.

LSNTAP and PBN recently held a webinar on evaluations, «From Investment to Impact: Recent Outcomes Evaluations of Legal Aid Tech Projects.»

Behavioral marital therapy: An outcome evaluation of conjoint, group and one spouse treatment: Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy Vol 14 (4) 1985, 157 - 168.

National Council on Crime and Delinquency, Outcome Evaluation of Parents Anonymous, unpublished manuscript, Oakland, Calif., 2007.

RAV has recently completed an outcomes evaluation of I like, like you.

Outcome evaluation of the Girls» and Boys» Town Family Home Program.

On the multi-site Permanency Innovations Initiative Evaluation project, Dr. Meisch developed and conducted a rigorous outcome evaluation of a site foster care intervention designed to reduce the length of stay in foster care.

Based off of the findings from Healthy Relationships California conducting five years of outcome evaluation of thousands of participants attending hundreds of RME classes throughout California, this is the largest study ever conducted on the impact RME courses have on participants in a range of categories including: relationship satisfaction, communication skills, and conflict resolution skills.

Outcome evaluation of Washington State's Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program (Document No. 14 - 12 - 2201).

An outcome evaluation of the implementation of the triple P - Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong.

Not exact matches

The morality of any situation is determined on a case by case evaluation of the possible outcomes.

The report evaluates the contribution of Commonwealth environmental water to environmental outcomes in 2014 - 15, complementing previous short term monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2012 - 13 and 2013 - 14.

The report evaluates the contribution of Commonwealth environmental water to environmental outcomes in 2016 - 17, complementing the first two years of LTIM Project monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2014 - 15 and 2015 - 16 and previous short term monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2012 - 13 and 2013 - 14.

The reports evaluate the contribution of Commonwealth environmental water to environmental outcomes in 2014 - 15, complementing previous short term monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in previous years.

4.4 the effectiveness of monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements for the watering activity including clear links to the defined expected outcomes.

«Outcomes will include a collaborative culture in the program, effective reporting, evaluation, support and rigorous monitoring of scientific effort to promote high quality targeted research to meet the objectives of the program,» the tender document says.

The report evaluates the contribution of Commonwealth environmental water to environmental outcomes in 2016 - 17, complementing the first two years of LTIM Project monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2014 - 15 and 2015 - 16.

«These latest scientific reports — the first of a five year monitoring and evaluation programme — indicate that Commonwealth environmental water use during 2014 - 15 has contributed to positive outcomes for native fish, birds, frogs, and contributed to healthy waterways and productive environments.

Monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement are critical components of natural resource management programs, particularly in highly variable natural systems where the outcomes from actions can be uncertain.

Monitoring and evaluation supports the efficient and effective use of Commonwealth environmental water and will assist in demonstrating the environmental outcomes from watering activities.

Attached is a summary of the latest outcomes from monitoring and evaluation activity that has occurred during 2014 - 15 in the seven selected areas that are the subjects of long - term intervention monitoring.

The report evaluates the contribution of Commonwealth environmental water to environmental outcomes in 2015 - 16, complementing the first year of LTIM Project monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2014 - 15 and previous short term monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2012 — 13 and 2013 — 14.

The report evaluates the contribution of Commonwealth environmental water to environmental outcomes in 2015 - 16, complementing the first year of LTIM Project monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2014 - 15 and previous short term monitoring and evaluation work undertaken in 2011 - 12, 2012 - 13, 2013 - 14.

The focus of each monitoring and evaluation plan is to determine whether Commonwealth environmental water is achieving the outcomes expected of it at the local and Basin scale.

Communicating the outcomes of BMBRI's development and evaluation projects, at domestic and international forums

The evaluation report from Leeds Metropolitan University (which contains a description of the project, as well as reporting on process and outcomes) was glowing — and can be downloaded here

Current research includes: co-leading organisational case studies in Birthplace in England, a national study of birth outcomes in home, midwife led, and obstetric led units; investigating the relationship between measures of safety climate and health care quality in A and E and intrapartum care; and conducting nested process evaluations of two trials of obesity in pregnancy behavioural interventions.

Parenting UK advises commissioners that when reviewing evaluations of parenting programmes, they should consider: whether the evaluation is independent and objective; whether the evaluation has been undertaken by an organisation or an individual with the appropriate skills and knowledge in undertaking evaluations; details of outcomes and effectiveness.

Intervention and outcome: After evaluation of the case, a frenotomy procedure was suggested to improve tongue function and reduce the breastfeeeding difficulties and nipple injury.

This economic evaluation was based on a rigorously conducted cohort study of sufficient size to detect clinically important differences in adverse perinatal outcomes.

For the purposes of this economic evaluation, the forms were initially used in a related study funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) research for patient benefit programme «assessing the impact of a new birth centre on choice and outcome of maternity care in an inner city area,» which will be reported in full elsewhere, comparing the costs of care in a free standing midwifery unit with care in an obstetric unit in the same trust.16 The data collected included details of staffing levels, treatments, surgeries, diagnostic imaging tests, scans, drugs, and other resource inputs associated with each stage of the pathway through intrapartum and after birth care.

This evaluation, mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P.L. 111 - 148), is designed to build knowledge for policymakers and practitioners about the effectiveness of the MIECHV program in improving outcomes for at - risk children and families.

Participating children had higher rates of high - school completion, lower rates of grade retention and special education placement, and a lower rate of juvenile arrests.32 Another example showing more intensive programming has larger impacts is the Healthy Steps evaluation showing significantly better child language outcomes when the program was initiated prenatally through 24 months.33 These studies suggest that a more intensive intervention involving the child directly may be required for larger effects to be seen.

In other words, even when home visitation programs succeed in their goal of changing parent behaviour, these changes do not appear to produce significantly better child outcomes.21, 22 One recent exception, however, was a study of the Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) model with low - income Latino families showing changes in home parenting and better third - grade math achievement.23 Earlier evaluations of HIPPY found mixed results regarding program effectiveness.

Given the heterogeneity in the choice of outcome measures routinely collected and reported in randomised evaluations of models of maternity care, a core (minimum) data set, such as that by Devane 2007, and a validated measure of maternal quality of life and well being would be useful not only within multi-centre trials and for comparisons between trials, but might also be a significant step in facilitating useful meta - analyses of similar studies.

Results published in the American Journal of Public Health were based on evaluation data from Legacy for ChildrenTM, a public health intervention program designed to improve child outcomes by promoting positive parenting among low - income mothers of infants and young children.

To develop an evaluation plan to measure the process, impact, and outcomes of program activities.

The rates of some adverse outcomes were too low for us to draw statistical comparisons, and ongoing evaluation of home birth is warranted.

Future trials in this area would benefit from drawing on a framework for trials of complex interventions which explicitly requires theoretical modelling between processes and outcomes in the pre-trial stage, and a process evaluation of the trial (Anderson 2008).

Given the heterogeneity in the choice of outcome measures routinely collected and reported in randomised evaluations of models of maternity care, a core (minimum) dataset, such as that by Devane 2007, and a validated measure of maternal quality of life and wellbeing would be useful not only within multi-centre trials and for comparisons between trials, but might also be a significant step in facilitating useful meta - analyses of similar studies.

Even recently, he blamed King for a teacher - evaluation system that the governor negotiated with lawmakers after the vast majority of teachers ended up with high ratings, an outcome that Cuomo said «doesn't reflect reality.»

The Legislators also supports an explicit law that ensures school districts, individual schools, teachers and students are protected from any withholding of state funds, sanctions or negative impact on a teacher's evaluation associated with the outcomes related to test opt outs.

In preparation for the workshop, we are collecting examples of existing evaluation tools, particularly those that focus on evaluating outcome expectations, self - efficacy and trust.

Evaluation tools tend to focus on outcomes for one or the other of these groups and may not provide an easy mechanism to link results across the groups.

The evaluation stems in part from the AAAS logic model and theory of change for public engagement with science, which describes short -, medium -, and long - term outcomes for individuals and for society more broadly.

«The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve the accuracy of diagnosis for Bell's palsy, to improve the quality of care and outcomes for patients with Bell's palsy, and to decrease harmful variations in the evaluation and management of Bell's palsy,» said Reginald F. Baugh, MD, Chair of the Bell's palsy Guideline Panel.

With the recent emphasis on translational and outcomes research, it should not be difficult to find a training program in fields related to CER, says Milton Weinstein, director of Harvard University's Program on the Economic Evaluation of Medical Technology and co-author of the book Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values.

«It would be helpful to have research looking to see whether screening interventions coupled with strategies to increase uptake of recommended evaluations and treatments may be more effective in improving outcomes,» Chou said by email.

The recommendations may also fail to find sufficient proof that routine screenings work because they're only looking at research done in primary care, not studies of outcomes from evaluations done by vision specialists, noted Dr. David Parke II, chief executive of the American Academy of Ophthalmology in San Francisco and author of an editorial in JAMA Ophthalmology March 1.