Sentences with phrase «outcome than a court»

It's much more difficult to set aside an arbitration outcome than a court's determination.

Often, it saves time and money and results in more predictable and happier outcomes than court.

Not exact matches

More than 95 % of personal injury claims are settled outside of court, but our lawyers will be by your side in the courtroom if that is necessary to seek a positive outcome to your claim.

And going back to pre-Sandy days, the Democrats were none too thrilled that Cuomo declined to intercede when the Senate and Assembly failed to agree on a redistricting plan for the congressional lines, kicking the matter to the courts and resulting in a far less gerrymandered outcome than a politically - controlled process would likely have produced.

However, my own experience suggests that it is more politics as usual, rather than the particular terms or even fact of a court judgment, that leads to the outcomes found by the authors.

Depending on its outcome, the case, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico, which has been in the courts for more than six years, could also establish a requirement that school boards base the removal of books from the school library or curriculum on more specific objective criteria than the school board used in this case.

We surmise that the different outcomes turned less on differences in constitutional language than on political differences between the courts.

Increasingly what we see in the courts is a rising number of people who represent themselves with measurably worse outcomes than if they had retained a lawyer, and many more who are just not seeking justice at all because of legal costs.

Long and Christensen found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their study.129 For federal appellate court briefs and state supreme court briefs, the only variable with a statistically significant correlation to reversal was jurisdiction, which is not surprising because state cases have higher reversal rates than federal cases.

The distinction between the varying approaches may be more apparent than real, and in many cases may lead to the same outcome particularly since not all courts distinguish between them and / or refer to them simultaneously.903 Of the few decisions where a foreign award has been refused enforcement pursuant to the second alternative of article V (1)(d), the party opposing enforcement brought evidence of fundamental or unjustifiable procedural defects that one could consider would have met the criteria of both approaches.

Initially, I'd guess that avoiding a politicized outcome will prove difficult, since Denniston's summary indicates that while the Court «conducted the hearing in the language of law, rather than politics,» the Court's ideological differences were also fairly obvious.

As described in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, back in January, a Pennsylvania county court dismissed charges against two individuals who ran a poker game out of a garage, finding that because the outcome of poker has more to do with skill than chance, it was not illegal under the state's gambling laws.

If the Woolf scheme were to be delivered as intended by the courts, it would provide an even better system for parties keen for swift and affordable outcomes than at present, and it has always been a truism for Lord Woolf that it is for the benefit of litigants that our civil justice system must unswervingly be directed.

It is undoubtedly the case that a claimant spouse can, in certain circumstances, obtain a more generous outcome in the English courts than the Scottish courts.

Lady Hale agreed with the judge in the High Court that, when looking at the best interests test in this context, it is whether the transfer is in the child's best interests rather than the eventual outcome.

As federal courts generally have more experience administering class actions than state courts, this outcome is often seen as desirable.

If you and your spouse can come to an agreement regarding parenting time on your own, through your attorneys, or with the help of a mediator, you will likely be more satisfied with the outcome than if you have to go to court and let a judge decide.

It is further thought that it should reduce the amount of forum shopping which currently takes place where one party makes a tactical decision to issue proceedings in a particular court on the basis that they believe they will receive a more favourable outcome there than in another court elsewhere.

With respect to the first 4 factors, the Court of Appeal found CACE ``... has no more direct interest in the outcome of this appeal than do lawyers generally who provide advice and counsel to employers...» (para. 27).

And now it seems that, after finalizing the numbers, the author has seemingly concluded once - and - for - all that his data show that public defendants generally producing better outcomes than private court - appointed attorneys.

With more than 35 years in court, we know what it takes to win, and have reached the best possible outcome in thousands of cases.

Here the Court of Appeal has sent a message: it prefers that individuals appeal UCAB decisions through the established judicial review process rather than look for a more favourable outcome in another forum.

Rather than try to concoct an array of legal definitions for reasonableness review, I believe the Supreme Court should simply encourage circuit courts to determine and explain, on a case - by - case basis, whether and how a particular sentencing outcome serves the purposes that Congress set out in the statutory text of the Sentencing Reform Act.

It has now been more than two full months since the Supreme Court decisions in Gall and Kimbrough, and I am really wondering if these rulings have had a significant impact on district court sentencing outcCourt decisions in Gall and Kimbrough, and I am really wondering if these rulings have had a significant impact on district court sentencing outccourt sentencing outcomes.

The court procedure in Financial Remedy applications means that approximately 90 % of all cases settle at the Financial Dispute Resolution hearing, which is akin to in - court mediation, rather than go to a final hearing when a judge determines the outcome.

Conducting an exercise in simple arithmetic recently, Minette Marrin in The Sunday Times (2 December 2007) showed that since only 12 % of rape allegations reported to the police are pursued in the courts, the rate of convictions as a proportion of prosecutions is 47 %, a figure slightly higher than that for murder (though with murder there is often a fall - back conviction — not so often the outcome in rape).

It is too soon to tell if the Supreme Court's ruling will have any impact on the outcome of more than a few cases that turn on disputed expert testimony.

Crucially, a slip and fall settlement almost always results in a much faster outcome than going to court, meaning you get the money you deserve and need sooner — so you can stop the bills from piling up.

This outcome refl ected the court's view that the questions raised were essentially ones of politics, rather than law.

In state court, pro se defendants charged with felonies fared as well as, and arguably significantly better than, their represented counterparts... of the 234 pro se defendants for whom an outcome was provided, just under 50 percent of them were convicted on any charge....

But better than that, you still have time to hire a traffic ticket attorney to fight on your behalf who, if he or she does their job right, can usually get you the best possible outcome — No Fines, No Points and No Court Costs.

In divorce mediation, not only do the parties determine the outcome of their agreements concerning their property and family (rather than the court making orders), they may also dictate the pace at which they complete their matter.

You and your spouse will discuss the issues that are most important to you, directly, without the stress and hostility of court, creating a pathway toward resolution that is typically more efficient, with an outcome more durable, than that achieved in court.

Mediation can be a better solution than court as it often results in a more beneficial outcome for both parties.

Those who find such an individual to handle their legal matter can be sure that at least their lawyer will be interested in resolving their problem with the most reasonable and positive outcome, rather than simply defining the problem and litigating it in court.

The three hour mediation process cost them less than $ 200, which both Ali and Sam see as a preferable outcome to spending upwards of $ 50,000 each in going to court for formal court orders.

Mediation can help avoid the need for court, and separating parents who make their own arrangements are often happier about the outcome than those who go through the formal court process.

There is also a discussion about negotiating settlements rather than spending a great deal of family funds on going to court where you may lose control of the outcome of your situation.

This means that divorcing couples can decide how best to resolve their marital issues rather than face an uncertain outcome by having the court decide for them.

In the end, with mediation, spouses have much more control over the outcome than they do in front of a family court judge.

He suggested that after a determination of native title has been made, formal and confidential offers of settlement that were made between the parties in the course of mediation should be presented to the trial Court so that it can decide whether adverse costs consequences should follow for the parties for whom the final outcome was not greater than that offered in the mediation.

If you want to make sure that you get the car, it is usually better to settle outside of court, where you have more control over the outcome, rather than having a judge decide what's best for you and your spouse.

The public and courts at large have embraced the new wave of alternative dispute resolution, recognizing that if parties are able to resolve their own issues, long term co-existence is far more likely than when an outcome is imposed by a third party who appears disconnected from the needs of the parties.

In short, Court produces many iatrogenic effects where the unintended harm to parents and children is at times far worse than the benefit from the well intentioned outcome.

Collaborative Law and mediation are cost - effective process options which allow clients to retain more control over the outcomes of their cases, than traditional court process.

Based on the concept that both spouses hire legal representation yet agree to resolve their differences without going to court, Collaborative divorce is generally less expensive and quicker than litigation, gives the couple greater control over the outcome of their divorce, and keeps children out of the controversy.

As you and your spouse or partner are reaching an agreement without having a decision imposed upon you by the court, the outcomes can be more creative than may be ordered by the court.