Establish your credibility as a strategic performance development partner using the 4MAT performance analysis tools and
outcomes framework which will enable you to deliver measureable training ROI.
Not exact matches
The types of new information that Whitecoat will collect is based upon the Patient Reported
Outcome Measures
framework,
which is gaining prominence.
Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse of market power (legal
framework must «level the balance of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions
framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system»
which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed
outcomes - perverse
outcomes in the case of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)
We carried out a survey of registered fathers, from
which we analysed their preferences and how this matched ECM
outcomes and EYFS
frameworks.
The specific standards chosen within the
outcomes framework represent those standards
which most directly predict later school success and align with Learning Standards for Early Childhood.
Future trials in this area would benefit from drawing on a
framework for trials of complex interventions
which explicitly requires theoretical modelling between processes and
outcomes in the pre-trial stage, and a process evaluation of the trial (Anderson 2008).
However, officials note that «the current inspection
framework is antithetical to the Steiner ethos / pedagogical approach» in terms of «Literacy in Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) and Key Stage 1 (KS1)», where Ofsted required «more formal learning»; «KS2 tests», as «Last year, the Academy pupils did not sit the tests (the Academy provided the exam papers and rooms for pupils to sit the exams but parents chose not to allow their pupils to sit the tests)»; and «Teaching and learning», where it is noted that the schools consider that «any process
which judges learning as the immediate
outcome from teaching in a lesson is inappropriate.
«We have been through a number of Ofsted
framework changes and each time the bar has been raised making it even harder to achieve outstanding,
which makes the
outcome of our latest inspection even more rewarding.
The
framework contains learning
outcomes which maps to the PSHE and Computing Curriculum, but it also presents opportunities for teachers to incorporate online safety into a range of other subjects, e.g. English, and while it doesn't provide teaching resources, it does give schools a very clear idea of the competencies pupils should have at each stage of their learning.
Universal design for learning (UDL; CAST, 2009), an educational
framework in
which teachers provide students with multiple methods for learning new content and demonstrating learning
outcomes, recognizes digital storytelling as an authentic, digital - age pedagogical approach for diverse learners (Rose, Meyer, & Hitchcock, 2005).
5:14 Dr. Montecel explains the three premises on
which the
framework is based: (1) The problem is systemic (2) Achieving student success requires developing a vision of seeking
outcomes for all children, no matter where they come from, the color of their skin, and the language they speak.
The second subpurpose is to apply the proposed analytic
framework to recognize institutions in
which their students tend to have better academic
outcomes (transfer rates and eventual four - year degree attainment).
The observations in his REStat paper are artefacts of a specific theory of decision under risk (Subjective Expected Utility) and (to boot) a specific functional form for one of the great universe of underlying functions possible in the SEU
framework (logarithmic utility of
outcomes,
which is unbounded both below and above... a very special case in the universe of possible utilities of
outcomes).
The «National Commitment to Improved
Outcomes in the Delivery of Programs and Services for Aboriginal Peoples and Torres Strait Islanders» [33], the New South Wales Government's «Statement of Commitment to Aboriginal People» [34], and the «Victorian Koori Services Improvement Plan» [35] are examples of
frameworks at the policy level,
which conceivably form the basis for the establishment of
framework legislation.
To this end, the «National Commitment» talks of a «
framework for improving
outcomes» [36] for Indigenous peoples; the «Victorian Strategy» talks of «an «umbrella»
framework within
which both existing and future... policies for Koori services will sit», [37] and the New South Wales Statement declares itself to be the «foundation for moving forward».
The quality of evidence for network estimates of the primary
outcomes will be assessed with the GRADE
framework,
which characterises the quality of a body of evidence on the basis of the study limitations, imprecision, heterogeneity or inconsistency, indirectness and publication bias.
While some states adopt a more congenial approach in negotiations directed to non-native title
outcomes, emphasis on a legal
framework makes the State a respondent to a claim in
which the applicant group seeks to burden its (that is, the Crown's) radical title to the land.
These reports highlight the need for all Australian governments, led by the federal government, to have clearly targeted, long - term plans
which identify redressing Indigenous disadvantage as a national priority and
which measure progress within an equality
framework; to be transparent about the
outcomes sought, with adequate performance indicators and benchmarks; and to ensure ongoing and independent monitoring and evaluation of
outcomes.
The Touchpoints approach offers healthcare providers and early education professionals a
framework to build better partnerships with families around mutual strengths - based caregiving and parent engagement, all of
which benefit child
outcomes.
Further, it is my view that the establishment of an ongoing legal
framework for agreements between governments and Indigenous peoples based on mutual partnership will fundamentally bolster the level at
which self - determination can be exercised, and that more «practical benefits» such as those associated with overcoming disadvantage, will result as a corresponding
outcome over time.
In order to prepare this case study, all parties have authorised the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission to access documents and other materials, released with the consent of respective representatives and
which provide background to the agreed
frameworks and
outcomes of the process.26
These variables were categorized as work demands, work resources (e.g. control, support), individual differences (e.g. coping style, attributional style), and
outcomes, although the model was intended as a
framework into
which any relevant variables can be applied.
In addition, adopting a genuine «learning by doing» approach can be a very accountable process, as evidenced by Malaysia's National Transformation Program,
which has a reporting and monitoring
framework built into the program to enable regular reporting on
outcomes and a process for escalating concerns.
These findings are theoretically consistent with Attachment Theory,
which provides a useful
framework for examining how maternal - child interactions could influence feeding and child weight
outcomes [24, 43, 69].
We believe that all couples can achieve a more productive and fair process of resolution of their conflicts using EMI's client - centered
framework,
which concentrates on assisting all people involved in achieving the best possible
outcome through a cooperative approach.
Although
outcome measures are paramount in clinical governance they are not always obtainable and therefore it is our view that activities,
which can be observed, should be compared to agreed standards — a competency
framework.
That the government establish a
framework to monitor and evaluate the impact of the amendments against their intended
outcomes, including the establishment of baseline information and benchmarks against
which to assess economic development in the interests of traditional owners and Indigenous Northern Territorians over time.
At the most general level, the
framework presented in Figure 1 illustrates how the primary developmental changes of adolescence have an impact on the developmental
outcomes of adolescence via the interpersonal contexts in
which adolescents develop.
Increasingly, in complex public health evaluation research, there are questions about whether all relevant benefits can be captured in a single summary
outcome measure such as QALY or unit of «effectiveness» or net benefit approach17
which is why the use of a cost - consequence analysis (CCA)
framework is being recommended for such economic evaluations.18 Other
outcomes from the trial such as the Parent — Infant Relationship Global Assessment Scale (an observational measure that is independently rated blind to group allocation) will be included in the CCA so that all costs and
outcomes from the trial can be displayed transparently for decision - makers to consider trade - offs themselves.