Sentences with phrase «outcomes if the risk»

Risk Management is about minimizing the range of possible bad outcomes if a risk is taken, not eliminating all risk.

Not exact matches

«However, if Donald Trump were to win, that outcome would have been unexpected and thereby may cause a jump in the equity risk premium,» Levkovich wrote.

«If you're not taking risks, you're not necessarily living in a place to get outsized outcomes,» Devane says in the video.

Starting a business is hard, and if you did a really sober - minded assessment of the risks and likely outcomes, you'd probably never get started in the first place.

Their interest is piqued only if harsh management practices run the risk of leading to one of two outcomes: an exodus of customers or an inability to hire workers the company needs.

I wrote the book «Angel» in order to detail the risks involved in angel investing, and share strategies that might increase your odds at having a positive outcome if you choose to become an angel.

Obviously, there's no guarantee that this particular round of tightening will have the same outcome, but if you recognize the risk here, it might be prudent to have as much as 10 percent of your wealth in gold bullion and gold stocks.

These risks must be accepted should the downside risk to the economy lead to even worse outcomes if realized.

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

If the final outcome having balanced out (estimated) risk tolerance, age etc. can be a «muddy compromise», I'm there.

If this advance continues, I would expect to see reasonable opportunities for speculative exposure at contained risk, but it is a bad idea to chase market risk here, under conditions that have generally produced dismal outcomes throughout history.

Simply: If hospital birth were useful, the data would support it, but all homebirth studies (1 - 20), show better outcomes of low risk women at planned attended homebirth.

Explain that if they plan birth at home there is a small increase in the risk of an adverse outcome for the baby.

If an experienced doctor feels circumstances have began while in labor that might increase the risk of a bad outcome to my baby so a cesarean is recommended, that is good clinical practice.

We analyzed 8 outcomes of child health (neonatal deaths, prenatal deaths, Apgar...», or even «The findings suggest that homebirths attended by midwives may be equally safe if not safer for women with low - risk pregnancies», which could mean «safer for women» who have «low - risk pregnancies» or equally «safer» for «women who have low - risk pregnancies».

If midwives were getting good outcomes with a low risk population, their policies would be fairly inexpensive.

It may also help explain why the US does comparatively well for perinatal outcomes but very badly in terms of infant mortality, if massive, high tech, emergency, intervention, which is readily available, has kicked the can down the road, past the neonatal period, but the baby dies at some later date (and it will be higher risk for the rest of infancy, at least, due to prematurity).

When this 20 % risk of death is compared to the 0.02 % rate of cord prolapse during labor at homebirth that might have a better outcome if it happened in hospital, this means that a low risk woman has a 1000 times higher chance of having a life threatening complication either to her life or her fetus / newborns life at planned hospital birth, than if she plans to have an attended homebirth with a well - trained practitioner.

It is only now, in February 2018, that the HSE have put a Risk Assessment Committee in place to see if there were any adverse outcomes and whether these faulty devices are still being used in the 11 maternity units.

If the insurance company won't cover it, it's because they have determined that the risk of a bad outcome is too high for the level of premium they are getting.

«if we are agreed (mostly) that homebirth for women with risk factors in their pregnancy leads to an increase in adverse outcomes compared to hospital birth, where to next?

If you are at high risk of going into premature labour, your health care provider can take special precautions to ensure the best outcomes for you and your baby.

If all low risk women were being cared for by midwives in out of hospital settings, we would see better outcomes, healthier mamas and babies, and women would be able to tell their birth story with confidence that they had control.

A woman choosing place of birth is autonomous if she receives all relevant information on available choices, risks and benefits, is capable of understanding and processing the information and choosing place of birth in the absence of coercion, provided she intends no harm to others and is accountable for the outcome.

They also pull out the «one child harmed is too many» while ignoring the risks that may be present in a hospital (though they do give lip service to the «possibility» that hospitals can have risks too), playing it off as if only homebirth could be associated with negative outcomes.

In future updates of this review, if appropriate, for our primary outcomes, we will temporarily remove studies at high or unclear risk of bias (using the allocation concealment domain) to examine whether this has an impact on results.

In fact, there is little hard evidence to suggest that, if the pregnancy is «high - risk», a negative outcome is more likely if a home birth is attempted, so there is an argument for including «high - risk» pregnancies in this type of analysis, and this was attempted as part of this research project.

This is understandable; if planned home birth is associated with a greatly elevated risk of serious negative infant outcomes, then most women and clinicians would be reluctant to attach as much importance to other benefits it might offer.

While father absence has been associated with a host of negative children's outcomes, including increased risk of dropping out of school and lower educational attainment, poorer physical and mental health, and behavioural problems,36 - 40 higher levels of involvement by nonresident fathers may assuage the negative effects of father absence on children's outcomes.41, 42 Quality of the parents» relationship before divorce, or of the pre-divorce father / child relationship, can also be an important factor: children fare worse following divorce when pre-divorce relationships were good and fare better when pre-divorce relationships were poor, 43,44 suggesting children are sometimes better off without a father if the father's relationship to the child or the mother was not good.

And this inflammatory use of a «relative percentage risk» rather than relative risk or absolute risk... for example, even if assuming the writer's awkward data is valid, you can to look at infant living rates and see 99.6 % vs 98.4 %, which means there's only a 1.2 % higher risk of bad outcome from at - home birth than hospital.

If your ob / gyn says you need a c / sec and you refuse b / c you believe s / he is wrong or you refuse b / c you do not want to risk a uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy, who then takes full unequivocal responsibility for the present birth's outcome?

We thought at first that there may be risk for confounding if the control group used uterotonics or analgesics, but our review of the latest systematic reviews gave us no reason to suspect that this would confound the results; though it was interesting that neonatal safety of uterotonics and analgesics was determined based on limited outcomes of APGARs and NICU admission.

This is a study that supports the fact that low - risk women can deliver safely at home if they so choose without raising their risk of unwanted outcomes.

IF, as they claim, «home birth is safe as long as the patients are sufficiently low risk,» then how can you account for the increase in bad outcomes, which is now becoming undeniable?

In studies where there was randomisation at the clinic level, all women may have been exposed to the same intervention, and contamination between groups would thereby be reduced, but there may still have been a risk of response bias if outcomes were reported to staff providing care.

In the Ledzokuku, Krowor and Madina constituencies, the outcome of the primaries is said to have created deep - seated cracks such that if nothing is done before the election, the NDC risk losing the seats.

«While acknowledging the potential negatives of such a convention — e.g., the risk of amendments being approved that would weaken the home rule authority of local governments — the Executive Committee viewed the opportunity to strengthen the position of municipalities in New York's governmental structure as more important and voted to approve NYCOM's support of a «Yes» vote on the constitutional convention question facing New York voters this November, with the additional stipulation that municipal officials would need to run for and be elected as delegates to the convention if our intended outcomes are to be achieved,» the guide states

«We will never have an opportunity like this again,» Dadey said, adding the courts are «an unknown outcome that I'm not willing to take a risk on, and even if we have fairer maps for 2012 we still don't have long - term structural reform.»

«If learning about adverse health outcomes helps them to predict patients at risk, then this is a perfectly reasonable way to make money,» he says.

Rather, the authors investigate temporal relationships to find out if the risk factor, here bed - sharing, might affect the health outcome, in our example asthma.

«There is a real risk that as clinics proliferate, if we don't address it in a more proactive way, as we see negative outcomes for patients grow and people get mixed bags of information about stem cells, then this could really negatively impact the public perception of this research.»

If we can reduce these risk factors, and perhaps reduce the rate of post-natal mood disorders in mothers and negative health outcomes in their offspring, then that can only be a good thing.»

Her team's next step will be to understand whether certain patients are at higher risk for getting infected with rhinovirus in the first place and to ask if there are other risk factors for pneumonia and other poor outcomes from the infection.

«But if you flip it on its head and look at potential positive outcomes, those same individuals may also thrive in complex and bustling environments where it's appropriate for them to take risks and seek thrills,» he says.

This study didn't examine birth outcomes, but prompted the researchers to wonder if this rapid biological aging could put a woman at greater risk of premature delivery, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and other problems.

When we looked at outcomes stratified by treatment, Caucasians and African Americans had similar risks of lymphedema if they had a SLN,» says Benjamin Smith, M.D., associate professor in MD Anderson's Department of Radiation Oncology and the study's senior author.

«If we know who is at risk, we can begin to treat them before the end of their pregnancy — and hopefully they'll have improved pregnancy outcomes.»

«If you make a poor decision using a telephone consultation, you potentially put the patient at risk for a poor outcome,» Meyer said.

Cannabis use disorder (CUD), replacing previous cannabis abuse and cannabis dependence, might be as common as appearing in one - fifth of regular cannabis users.6 Risk of CUD is higher in those who use more frequently, are male, and begin at a younger age.6, 24 However, in another study of those meeting criteria for having CUD, 67 % remitted (no longer met criteria) at 3 years, with 64 % of them no longer using cannabis.25 Whether regular medical use might result in CUD, what outcomes this might have, and if discontinuation presents concerns are all not well understood.

So, if there are risks to acknowledging a personal connection to the outcome of their science, the gamble is greater for women scientists because they are more likely to be portrayed in this light.