They argue that discretion and horse sense will lead to better investing
outcomes than rules and algorithms.
Not exact matches
To be fair, Gladwell never said that innate talent had no role to play in achievement, but the extent to which inborn ability sways
outcomes in this analysis seems much greater
than the degree suggested by the 10,000 hour
rule.
As discussed below, the Department believes the approach adopted in this final
rule likely yields the most desirable
outcomes including avoidance of costly market disruptions, more compliance cost savings
than other alternatives, and reduced investor losses.
The monetary policy debate over whether
rule - like behavior is preferable to pure discretion dates back at least to Henry Simons in 1936.1 More recently, in their Nobel Prize - winning work, Finn Kydland and Ed Prescott demonstrated that a credible commitment by policymakers to behave in a systematic
rule - like manner leads to better
outcomes than discretion.2 Since then, numerous papers using a variety of models have investigated the benefits of
rule - like behavior in monetary policy and found that there are indeed significant benefits.
The Oliners» work shows that the golden
rule is far better
than obedience to edicts in producing positive, life - affirming
outcomes.
Rather
than, punitively, playing «take - away» with the child when they're not conforming to family
rules, it's much better to focus on educating them beforehand about the negative
outcome of their questionable behaviors.
More
than 900 provisional ballots remain outstanding, and it is not immediately clear how many of those will be
ruled eligible or whether they will have any effect on the
outcome of the election.
Imagine if in 2007, when we were still in government, there had been a contest rather
than a coronation and we had conducted this according to our current
rules with a similar
outcome to the one two weeks ago.
Although moral codes appear to
rule out the act of killing in the bridge experiment, most moral behaviour in animals appears focused on
outcomes — the death of an individual, say — rather
than the act that brought it about.
The Pennsylvania State Board of Education is slated this week to vote on
rules that would make the state the first to require students to master a set of learning
outcomes, rather
than take a prescribed number of courses, in order to graduate.
Because we could follow the same children over a period of time, we could do a better job of
ruling out the role of influences other
than middle - school attendance on educational
outcomes.
«Subtle» aspects of family involvement — parenting style and parental expectations, for example — may have a greater impact on student achievement
than more «concrete» forms such as attendance at school conferences or enforcing
rules at home regarding homework.144 Some researchers, policy makers, and practitioners argue that these subtle forms of family involvement are not easily influenced by schools.145 In contrast, we argue that the value of creating participatory structures in schools lies in its potential for increasing family and community members «sense of engagement in children «s education, and, as a consequence, augment and reinforce the subtle behaviors responsible for improved
outcomes.146
In other words, one can not
rule out the possibility that teacher accuracy, rather
than influence, can explain the predictive nature of teacher expectations for students» academic
outcomes.
In their report they noted that improved academic
outcomes for a student in a cyber charter school was «the exception rather
than the
rule.»
It's true that the
outcome of the
rule may be that students become segregated based on parental involvement, BUT as I pointed out in my original post that is only true if the Charter Schools actually are better
than the public schools.
, the
rules in debate «Science» are flawed and thus the cause — what possible
outcome other
than Null.
This reasoning is mirrored in the cognitive laboratory, where people's responses are also often informed by the consequences associated with competing paths of action (the data are quite complex but it seems safe to conclude that most people are sensitive to weighting the
outcomes of competing actions rather
than being exclusively entrenched in immutable moral
rules).
The cleverer we are in the design of relevant and deliverable climate change results, the sooner we constrain the potential for some really «dangerous»
outcomes that can not currently be
ruled out at less
than a 10 % chance.
«The principal concern is that as compliance - based regulation is focused on
outcomes rather
than rules, there is more ambiguity and less certainty for firms as to what they must actually do to achieve compliance,» says the consultation report.
The regime is focused, somewhat obscurely, on «
outcomes» rather
than rules.
In a fast - moving global economy with complicated cross-jurisdictional
rules, insurance against bad
outcomes could be more attractive
than either contract risk allocation or litigation.
With this change, rather
than being obliged to conform to a specific set of proscriptive
rules, firms are required to deliver specific
outcomes regarding the management and the ethical compliance of the firm.
But more
than that, the
rules and
outcomes in criminal cases are specific.
In regulating both entities as well as individuals, the SRA has shifted its
rules away from a proscriptive, «tick - the - box» approach towards «
outcomes focused regulation» (OFR), described as an approach focused on the
outcomes achieved rather
than on the processes used to achieve them, and as a rejection as a «one size fits all» approach to regulation.
In regulating both entities as well as individuals,
rules are shifting away from proscriptive, «tick - the - box» approach towards an «
outcomes» approach, where the focus is on the
outcomes achieved rather
than on the processes used to achieve them.
It has now been more
than two full months since the Supreme Court decisions in Gall and Kimbrough, and I am really wondering if these
rulings have had a significant impact on district court sentencing
outcomes.
It is too soon to tell if the Supreme Court's
ruling will have any impact on the
outcome of more
than a few cases that turn on disputed expert testimony.
In its drive for change the SRA could do worse
than supplement core duty 1.05 and build on references to training in
rule 5 by incorporating work - based learning
outcomes 1.4 and 7.1 — 7.4 into the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007 to make the point.
He completed his predoctoral internship at the Center for Cognitive Therapy in Philadelphia, conducted the first comparative
outcome study on what is now known as ACT as part of his dissertation under the supervision of ACT founder Steven Hayes, and has published both basic and applied research relating to
rule - governance, experiential avoidance, and ACT for depression for more
than twenty years.
Collaboration occurs when a group of autonomous stakeholders, sharing a problem domain, interact using shared
rules, norms and structures to address issues related to that domain.23 Inherent in collaboration is the notion that the
outcomes achieved are more effective, efficient and / or sustainable
than what would have been achieved if organizations were working alone.24, 25,26,27,28 Researchers28, 29,30 have found that collaboration and integration of services for vulnerable populations are more effective, efficient and less costly
than narrowly focused initiatives.
Conversely, ensuring that parental monitoring measures do not include items evaluating parental limit setting, clarity of
rules, or consistency in discipline will help to determine whether this particular aspect of behavioral control is more important to youth
outcomes than others.
And despite those reconfigurations, which took immense effort to complete, Bailey said that the loan process is more complicated
than it was before TRID — the exact opposite of the
rule's desired
outcome.