Sentences with phrase «outlier data»

Conclusion: claims of a deceptive and biased Yamal chronology turn out to rely on outlier data that should be omitted; our new research, based on a greatly expanded dataset, supports the finding that tree - growth (and inferred summer temperature) in this region are likely greater in the last 100 years than for any previous century in the last 2000 years.

For example, when reporting their work, researchers must refrain from discarding outlying data or altering images to emphasize some aspects, as «such actions violate researchers» fundamental obligation to produce reliable and objective results,» the guide states.

■ To account for outlier data, as presented in the original publication, 5 % and 10 % more mice were added to each cohort, respectively, to ensure at least 13 mice survive each cohort for a minimum power of 80 %.

That leads many people to assume that it's just a result of data mining, and their natural instinct is to immediately seek out any possible outlying data that they believe must make it look so good.

I know you're aware of this because you previously referenced outlying data points as an indication that some catastrophe was taking place.

The authors show that Chylek & Lohmann selectively used a few unrepresentative outlier data points to gain the lower estimate.

Reversion to the Mean Another way of looking at this from an economics point - of - view is what we call a «reversion to the mean,» which simply means that when you have outlying data points where performance is better than usual for a period the data comes back down to a historical average.

Generally, credible scientists will base conclusions on what a significant portion of the evidence suggests, not based on the outlier data which is presented in evolutionary studies.

And this is not even an outlier data.

This excludes one outlier data point (61) from the Postn + / + data and two outlier data points (18 and 13) from the Postn − / − data.

So one could argue that the outlying data doesn't matter very much because there's a definite trend towards ebooks and online shopping; in other words though the data may not be totally accurate right now, it's likely to become even more accurate as Amazon continues to grow and eat up a bigger share of book sales.

Good way to try to get known is to put out outlier data and, if on the low chance it comes true, the propator becomes well known for predicting the unlikely.

Why present only the outlying data?

As a last bit of analysis, let's omit the outlier data, then compute the trend for each starting year to the present, for all start years from 1975 to 2005.

Isn't the outlier data only in 2010?