What they do show is that if the question is defined precisely enough, machines can compete with, and sometimes
outperform human lawyers.
Ludwig Bull, scientific director at CaseCrunch, the legal AI company which organised the contest, said: «These results show that if the question is defined precisely, machines are able to compete with and sometimes
outperform human lawyers.»
In the headlines this week is a story of an Artificial Intelligence system
outperforming human lawyers in reviewing non-disclosure agreements.