Not exact matches
But the windmills killing birds does far less damage to the environment
than a comparably sized (in terms of
power output) coal or
nuclear power plant.
The supply is unreliable, although more consistent
than wind generation which is notoriously unreliable and thermal,
nuclear, or hydro
power (if available) is required to carry sufficient reserve in the grid system to compensate for any changes in solar plant
output due to any changes in sunlight during the day.
Nuclear power, however, emits more
than twice the total heat as its electrical
output without the benefits of CO2 in the photosynthesis cycle.
Likewise if heat is indeed the main factor,
nuclear power, though CO2 - free, can not be an alternative since total heat emitted by
nuclear power plants is more
than twice the electrical
output.
Just down the road from us is Didcot A
power station, a large coal - burning plant with poor pollution control and therefore with substantial effects on local air quality, as well as more substantial emissions of radiation
than from any UK
nuclear power station and a Co2
output of about 8 million tonnes a year.
It might even be argued that variable wind
power is no more of a problem
than inflexible «baseload» generators such as coal - fired plants and
nuclear, which maintain a relatively steady
output regardless of demand, and regardless of
output from renewable plants.
Likewise
nuclear power produces no CO2 but does emit more
than twice the total heat
than its electrical
output.