Sentences with phrase «outside appeals court judge»

The Federal Circuit's choice to blow off Judge Posner's Apple - Google ruling is a shame, and especially so because the case is a rare instance when an outside appeals court judge has weighed in on patent law.

Not exact matches

In a culture ruled by virality, pithy memes like #IDontNeedFeminism threaten to have more firepower than sober observations — such as those of the former chief judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Patricia M. Wald — that gender inequality in cultures like the legal profession owes less to overt discrimination, and more to «subtle differences in how much more difficult it can be for women to locate and manipulate the levers of personal influence inside and outside the firm, with supervisors, senior partners, and clients.»

Funt's actions were «well intentioned» even if they were outside what he was permitted to do as a trial judge, says Jeffrey Ray, who represented Bornyk at the Court of Appeal.

This appeal raised the issue of whether or not a judge of the crown court had correctly exercised his jurisdiction to determine, after the conclusion of a trial of a defendant, an allegation that the defendant was in contempt of court because he had intimidated a witness outside the crown court during the course of the trial.

In 2013, Justice Stephen Goudge was recognized as one of Canada's most respected appellate judges and an inspiration outside of the Ontario Court of Appeal for his activities aimed to promote access to justice.

The New Brunswick court of appeal declined to hear the Crown's appeal of the decision, and the Supreme Court «may uphold Judge LeBlanc in whole or in part,» but are unlikely to uphold the court's 1921 decision, says Blue, who believes the case has significant implications for trade both within and outside of Cacourt of appeal declined to hear the Crown's appeal of the decision, and the Supreme Court «may uphold Judge LeBlanc in whole or in part,» but are unlikely to uphold the court's 1921 decision, says Blue, who believes the case has significant implications for trade both within and outside of CaCourt «may uphold Judge LeBlanc in whole or in part,» but are unlikely to uphold the court's 1921 decision, says Blue, who believes the case has significant implications for trade both within and outside of Cacourt's 1921 decision, says Blue, who believes the case has significant implications for trade both within and outside of Canada.

He cited a recent decision, Malton v Attia, 2016 ABCA 130 (CanLII)-- which falls just outside our snapshot, having been decided on April 29, 2016 — where the Court of Appeal recognized the challenges posed by self - represented litigants in another case where the trial judge was found to have gone too far in assisting the litigant:

For example case management justices dismissing cases in Alberta contrary to the rules of court or single judges sitting dismissing appeals at Court of appeal (very prevalent in Alberta) and chambers judges and masters acting like they are trial judges (masters dismiss cases and act outside of the jurisdiction allowed by the QBcourt or single judges sitting dismissing appeals at Court of appeal (very prevalent in Alberta) and chambers judges and masters acting like they are trial judges (masters dismiss cases and act outside of the jurisdiction allowed by the QBCourt of appeal (very prevalent in Alberta) and chambers judges and masters acting like they are trial judges (masters dismiss cases and act outside of the jurisdiction allowed by the QB Act)

Citing Watson J.A. in R. v. J.L.A., 2009 ABCA 324, the Court found that interventions in criminal appeals are «very unusual» because judges typically take the position that the issue in such cases is solely between an individual and the state — with no room for outside perspectives which may cause prejudice to the parties.

But what it means in practice is that the only reason today that Article III judges must defer to the D.C. Court of Appeals on questions of D.C. law is because the D.C. Circuit itself has said so — and so stare decisis, and not the Rules of Decision Act or principles of federalism — carries all the weight (and would not bind federal courts outside of the D.C. Circuit in diversity cases in which choice - of - law rules compel application of D.C. substantive law).

Judge Simpson refused Brennan leave to appeal, but outside the court the currently non-practising barrister said he would approach the High Court directly and ask it to hear his court the currently non-practising barrister said he would approach the High Court directly and ask it to hear his Court directly and ask it to hear his case.

Nevertheless, the majority of the appeals court judges saw that the three - judge panel that overturned the case six months ago did not follow the U.S. Supreme Court limits on the scope of its review by examining outside evidence, as per Reucourt judges saw that the three - judge panel that overturned the case six months ago did not follow the U.S. Supreme Court limits on the scope of its review by examining outside evidence, as per ReuCourt limits on the scope of its review by examining outside evidence, as per Reuters.

10) Judge tells us that a clerk will explain the appeal process and answer any questions we might have, outside the court room.