Surely we should talk in terms of intensity of divine Activity and fullness of human response, not in terms of «above» and «below,» «in» and «out,» «entrance,» and the like — these are mythological terms, and for our own day they are
outworn rather than significantly evocative mythological terms.
Not exact matches
Instead, we should engage in «edifying» discourse which seeks to help others «break free from
outworn vocabularies and attitudes,
rather than to provide «grounding» for the intuitions and customs of the present» (PMR 12).
Prayer is a perennial fact about men as men; and one might say that insofar as sophisticated moderns have assumed that prayer is an
outworn, superstitious practice, they have by that token ceased to be men and have contented themselves with being a
rather sophisticated variety of simian.
Is the classical intent of truth
outworn, does it need to be redefined, should we
rather uproar or should we let this realisation make us nihilistic and condemn all constructs holding truth (including post-truth) to be «manufactured truth»?