Sentences with phrase «over ffp»

Signing Toure would be a statement of PSG's ability to attract players from rival big clubs and show they are still serious players in the transfer market, despite concerns over FFP.

That's a point I alluded to earlier Amos — some people are quick to jump on our net spend in the current financial year and arrive at the conclusion that we're riding roughshod over FFP but when the cost of these players and wages is amortised over the length of their contracts, coupled with removing high earners (Tevez being the main one) from our books then it's entirely conceivable as to why we've spent # 80m - # 90m net without it jeopardising our chances of meeting FFP.

UEFA is probably already investigating them over FFP, and I'm sure if they spend another 150m, there will be no wiggle room.

Not exact matches

I should elaborate, it doesn't matter how many billionaires the club have as shareholders (not directors) under FFP the days of spend, spend, spend are over.

This has not happened, and I'm surprised that no one has ever hauled Wenger over the coals about the fact that as a qualified economist he never saw that the FIFA FFP rules would NEVER EVER bite the big spending clubs, yet this was the major reason we were never involved in big money transfers, although we were paying the highest process of any club in Europe for season tickets.

The champions - elect have spent a fortune since being taken over by Roman Abramovich 11 years ago but in the last two seasons with the threat of FFP hanging over their heads they have found a way to get round the rules by making a huge profit in their transfer sales.

My worst fears have come true FFP rules up in smoke City will win everything in two to three years time, I blame Platini his jelous of the EPL specialy our TV incom, now is time for a new managment we have two molti Bilioneres waiting to take over the club and ready to spend, but no one has the same money as the Etihad's no one

Wenger has made us financially secured by consistently finishing in top four... under him we have toped the FFP league for over 10 yrs.

We have way over 200m profits spread here and there, we can match PSG or City this window because FFP will look at your books every two years so with next years expected profits we can match anyone in Europe, but it's rediculous to think two players can cost more than a club in the bottom half of the EPL I would think twice before I pay over 100M only if it guarantees me CL title

Over 30 yrs old contract extension from performance is justified by the ffp regulations because youngster development and promotion is a big part of clubs future stability.

Liverpool can't spend their way out as Uefa FFP will be hanging over them.

FFP has been a complete failure in my books, teams like Man City, PSG etc are still going to spend ridiculous sums, we must be smart and act fast this transfer window we just can't have Wenger dilly dallying over transfers!

Off the pitch we've seen over # 250m of investment with little to no regard for adhering to concepts of FFP or sustainability of the club.

@Leo where have you been man Platini abolished FFP to help French League over EPL he said it wasn't fare that all the English teams get so much money from TV rights

This is going to be a problem for them over the next few seasons FFP means they can't spend ridiculous money anymore and there lack of home grown players means they have to waste some of there spend on players they might not Necessary want.

FFP rules now state you can only have $ 30 million loss over a 3 year period.

Take FFP away and they will bring in players over 150m price tag such as Neymar, Mbappe and etc... next season

Introduced by European football's governing body in 2010, FFP limits clubs to making losses of no more than EUR30m over three seasons.

Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations were introduced in 2012 to «reduce the levels of losses being incurred at some clubs and, over time, establish a league of financially self - sustaining professional football clubs».

FFP measures spending over a three year period and doesn't take full effect until 2015 anyway so one year's spending isn't going to be critical and dramatic decisions are unlikely to be taken this summer.

Mike, it's none of my business how other football clubs are run — over the past 150 years or so prior to FFP, there has been nothing set in stone as to the right or wrong way to run a football club.

Amos is quite right that we will not be maintaining the same scale of spending but one of the reasons we've had to do that level of spending over the last few years is to ensure we met FFP when it came in.

«As a result, in line with FFP sanctions, MCFC were fined # 49 million» Technically incorrect, # 49m of future CL income was withheld and split over three seasons.

Their FFP situation also explains why Arsenal are not interested in paying over the odds to bring Mustafi in.

A little off topic but Valencia have to sell in order to meet FFP regulations but ManShitty can meet FFP by laundering their owner's money through an over the top stadium and kit sponsorship.

French outfit Paris Saint - Germain are also in considerable trouble over breaching FFP, with fewer than 20 other teams under examination with regards to their spending.

Now, under FFP, if they exceed losses of 30m Euros (# 23.5 m) over a three - year period that includes the present campaign, they are liable to be sanctioned by Uefa.

However, concerns over meeting UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) obligations mean PSG could initially sign Mbappe on loan, according to sports daily L'Equipe.

FFP rules currently stipulate that clubs can not post losses of more than 30 million euros over the three - year period to 2018.

Sundance Institute's Vanguard Award honors artists whose work and vision represents the highest, most breakthrough level of innovation, originality, and independent spirit that the Institute's FFP program under Satter's leadership has fostered in artists over its 30 - year history.