Sentences with phrase «over lacazette»

Sometimes he starts players like iwobi and welbeck over Lacazette and Giroud.

I don't know why but if we are letting Sanchez leave for Mancity I would take Aguero anyday over lacazette and go all out for Mbappe.

Bony was rumoured today, I think I'd take Bony over Lacazette.

France uses target men as strikers so yes Giroud went over Lacazette it dosent mean Giroud is better.

Do you honestly think we would have bought Perez over Lacazette?

If i knew we were getting Aubameyang, i would have preferred Giroud to stay over Lacazette because Giroud has PL experience.

Honestly even if Giroud started over Lacazette, I would still have a problem with it.

Wenger played Iwobi over Lacazette and Giroud in our 4 - 0 loss to Liverpool Is Wenger related to iwobi?

Id personally take Chicharito over Lacazette any day (not saying he's my # 1 striker want; just basing my comment off the article).

Why did Welbeck start over Lacazette and Giroud?

(can i please go on record and state that I'd prefer Icardi over Lacazette personally.

French manager picked giroud over lacazette for euros so, on the face of it, he rates giroud more highly.

Started Coquelin at CB and played Iwobi over Lacazette in our 3 - 1 loss to City, etc

But this season he has played 3 at the back when 4 was more suitable, relied to heavily on Xhaka, played Monreal as CB (he did admirably though), Adelaide at LWB, Nelson at RWB, started Welbeck over both Lacazette and Giroud against Liverpool WTF?

Why did he favour Welbeck (a goal every 100 miles covered) over Lacazette?

I still can't get over Wenger starting Welbeck over Lacazette and Giroud in our 4 - 0 thrashing by Liverpool.

For the Loserpool game I belief that because Ox started over Saed and Welbeck over Lacazette, that many other players were pissed off and took the wind out of their sails.

I still can't get over Lacazette's 2 min goal.

I share in your opinion and I believe he's average and massively overrated like Welbeck.People will bring up the stats but it's a good thing I've watched him to know how bad he is.We have a lot of under achievers in our club.It's one thing fighting a battle you can win and another fighting a battle you've already lost.Giroud will hardly start over Lacazette and what makes it worse for him is that Laca's French and Wenger loves French players a lot.Let me give him thumbs up for giving his all and not going down without a fight.I wish more players in the team had his mentality.

In response to the Eddie Hoyte the main issue supporters have is that, with no disrespect to Iwobi, there is no way he should start in big games over Lacazette.

I got a good feeling over Lacazette and I do think it hasn't been done yet due to negotiations, OL want a replacement and to make sure they get the most they can...

The apparent doubts over Lacazette, reports The Guardian, concern his mentality, specifically his ability to perform at his best in big games when it really counts, and his ability to cope with the physical challenges of the Premier League.

I'd say most of the groundwork over Lacazette was done last season, but we began it well before that season.

We started Welbeck over Lacazette and Giroud and started OX who we knew was leaving

Lyon know they have got Arsenal where they want them over Lacazette — they are going to screw them into the ground over the fee.

The haggling back and forth with Marseille over Lacazette.

• Giroud chosen over Lacazette because I expect opposition to defend deep so less space to run into which is what Lacazette needs.

Wenger talked about attacking but started Iwobi over Lacazette!

Not exact matches

An early signing of quality in Sead Kolasinac and then the breaking of the transfer record to get Alexandre Lacazette from Lyon but that is it with a little over two weeks before the domestic season begins.

If he was then we would have Lacazette, Wenger wanted him 12 months ago and AFC made a bid of what was left over from the transfer kitty and AFC failed in that bid, ended up buying a player who Wenger has never shown any indication he has wanted.

Alexandre Lacazette could be a slightly risky proposition, but he has shown some serious ability to get the ball in the back of the net over the past two years with Lyon, and Wenger is no stranger to delving into the French Ligue 1 for players.

Arsenal have reportedly held further talks with Lyon over the signing of Alexandre Lacazette, in a deal worth # 49m plus additional payments.

Arsenal forward Alexandre Lacazette has indirectly risked causing a stir in a discussion over the club's Premier League title hopes this season.

Sell: Campbell, Walcott (let's face it, his time is over when we have the Ox, Welbeck and when we get Lacazette)

but no way are gibbs and monreal top top class... so the talking heads are right... same as it ever was same as it ever was... still need a DM attacking option and world class left back... kondogbia will do rodriguez or damine on left... most difficult is attack personally not interested in higuan cavani martinez all over rated and overpriced... benzema better for us but also way over priced... lacazette might work but expensive vietto or younger option in aguero mould more likely

Let's see what kane, lacazette etc do over the next few yes before we jump the gun and give them a title they can't claim

However things seem to have developed ever so slightly in the past week, as Lacazette has reportedly shown frustrations over the move and current rumours suggest that he is looking towards a move to the Premier League, having spent his entire career so far in Ligue 1.

I remember rooting for Lacazette signing over a year ago since he reminds me so much of Henry.

Not saying he's ready, just that other than Lacazette if the ball fell kindly to him he knows how to strike it, and he's another one of those who can be hard to pick up because he's looking for half a yard over his man or he's looking for a rebound.

If you'd asked me, all things considered such as value for money, skill, age, suitability etc I'd choose Lacazette over Mbappe.

Lacazette at 26 still has time Auba would be cutting the window fine and at 60mill transfer fee plus 20 mill in salary over 4 and 1/2 years is it worth it?

Would we prefer Draxler or Lacazette over Walcott?

He knew it wouldnt take a Lewandowski or even a Lacazette to win them over.

I would like to stress out once more that a player of Lacazette's or better caliber won't be signed for Arsenal, firstly because the club isn't going to spend much over the 40 million pounds limit.

The man whose goal against the Potters was harshly ruled offside has not let it bother him, though, and after another two goals in our Monday night win over West Brom, Alexandre Lacazette is starting to look the part at his new club.

Monreal in at CB provides an adept and semi creative ball playing presence in the defensive third which I think is important to keep us moving the ball fluidly and intelligently and also means opposition need to compensate for the possibility of Monreal clipping the ball over the top to Lacazette and cutting the midfield out.

Well it is for clubs that are happy to spend crazy money like that on a player, but Arsenal are certainly not one of those clubs, even though Arsene Wenger has broken the transfer record a few times in recent years and did so again this summer by spending over # 50 million to get Lacazette from Lyon.

With Xhaka already in the bag for # 34m, that will worry some supporters despite the noises over Mustafi and Lacazette, which to my mind are too little too late for players who are not top tier in their fields of expertise.

Combine them with Lacazette and Mesut Ozil to make a quartet packed with creativity, technical class, flair and finishing, it has the makings of a very balanced and talented Arsenal attacking line - up if they are able to get this deal over the line by Wednesday.

Xhaka and Lacazette look very good on YouTube, in fact most fans on JustArsenal.com were drooling over Xhaka and clamoring when Arsenal bought him.