The current case in point is the battle
over a labeling initiative on the ballot in Washington State (Initiative Measure No. 522).
Not exact matches
At least some of those concerns now seem to be playing out in a fight
over how America's largest food industry group financed a campaign against a food
labeling initiative.
At present,
over 20
labelling initiatives are members of FLO International.
Over the past year several
initiatives have been undertaken in both flexible packaging and
labelling segments, resulting in reduction worthy of celebration.
This
initiative will help reduce consumer confusion
over dates on the product
label, save households time and money, and help reduce unnecessary food waste.
Issues members identified are critical to address when developing a clean
label strategy included: • The cost of clean
label initiatives • The complexity of clean
label initiatives • The consumer's view on clean
label • The communications required internally and externally • The collaboration required with internal partners as well as vendor partners • The concern for companies
over brand integrity and CSR • The potential impact, both negative and positive, on corporate earnings
In addition to the U.S. Food Waste Challenge, USDA has unveiled several food loss reduction
initiatives over the past few years, including an app to help consumers safely store food and understand food date
labels, new guidance to manufacturers on donating misbranded or sub-spec foods, and research on innovative technologies to make reducing food loss and waste cost effective.
When it comes to transparency and food
labeling, the Times editorial board («
Labels for Controversial Ingredients» 11/7/13) favors voluntary disclosure by corporations
over ballot
initiatives which would legally require the disclosure of controversial ingredients like genetically modified organisms.