For years, the commission's 88 member nations have been split along an ideological divide no less profound than the one
over abortion in the United States.
I think the debate about whether we should design our children will replace the debate
over abortion in the United States and become the object of discussion worldwide.
Not exact matches
In 2008, just over 3,000 legal abortions were performed in the entire country — a tiny number given that Brazil has a population of 200 millio
In 2008, just
over 3,000 legal
abortions were performed
in the entire country — a tiny number given that Brazil has a population of 200 millio
in the entire country — a tiny number given that Brazil has a population of 200 million.
An illustrative example of this is the highly - publicized case of Jennie Linn McCormack, an Idaho mother of three who was arrested
in 2011 for causing her own
abortion with pills she bought
over the Internet.
Rap superstar Eminem, with singer Ed Sheeran, just released a track called «River,»
in which a man who calls himself a liar and a cheat expresses furious remorse
over an affair and an
abortion.
And such groups provided Catholic support for the president
in 2009, when he faced conservative Catholic criticism
over his commencement address at the University of Notre Dame, and
in 2010, when the bishops opposed Obama's health care law, alleging that it left the door open to taxpayer - funded
abortion.
Groups such as Catholics United and Faith
in Public Life got off the ground during and just after the 2004 election when a Catholic Democratic presidential nominee - Sen. John Kerry - was hard - pressed to find Catholic support
in the face of condemnations from some Catholic bishops
over his support for
abortion rights.
For single women, pick a fight
over contraception with the Catholic Church and run a national convention
in which the centrality of
abortion rights startled even seasoned observers.
With more than a hint of exasperation, Scalia concludes: «One will search
in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the argument
over these distinctions; and will find
in our society's tradition regarding
abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much less any indication how a constitutional argument about them ought to be resolved.
(If that sounds familiar, it's because the same argument was made twenty - five years ago
in the early stages of the battle
over legalized
abortion.)
The proposals for health care
in Congress this year, for example, will soon escalate the clash between religious hospitals and state agencies
over mandatory performance of
abortion: Any single - payer system will prove, as it must, irresistible to social engineers
in government, and each twist of the ratchet necessarily moves Catholic hospitals further from the Church and closer to the state.
Left - leaning people are becoming one - issue voters
over gay marriage
in the same way that right - leaning people make
abortion a litmus test.
Debates
over how far to go
in restricting
abortion will likely extend all the way up to the Republican presidential primary, with likely candidates already working hard for Christian Right support.
None of it seemed to matter to those
in the trenches, because they already knew what was most important: The legal right to
abortion had been guaranteed to them,
over and
over again.
The Church, however, has consistently taught
over the centuries that the direct and intentional taking of innocent human life, as
in abortion, is a grave and intrinsic evil.
What if I were to tell that since 1973
in a span of 38 years we have exterminated
over 50 million human beings by
abortion.
The «Starving Children all
over the world can not be solved with
abortion» You eave out the facts: Fact one is that many of those governments are
in control of the supplies that get to those countries..
She said: «On the day when the Belfast Court of Appeal ruled that it is up to the Stormont Assembly to decide on
abortion law
in Northern Ireland, the Government at Westminster has now decided to ride roughshod
over the views of the vast majority of people
in Northern Ireland.»
Singer has said that he sometimes thinks he and the Pope are the only ones who understand what is involved
in the controversy
over abortion and related issues.
Nino let Clarence Thomas take
over reading the dissent
in Stenberg v. Carhart, as their colleagues were willing to strike down a law
in Nebraska that barred the grisly procedure known as «partial - birth
abortion.»
It was that consensus that unraveled
in the debates
over Vietnam, civil rights,
abortion, sexual morality, women's issues, and the limits of tolerance.
Patrick Kennedy, a Rhode Island Democrat, found himself
in a similar row with his bishop
in 2009
over abortion and was barred from receiving communion.
During the 2004 presidential campaign, Sen. John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, was denied communion
over his support for
abortion rights, which some bishops said was
in direct violation of the church's teachings.
I have great admiration for the courage and the indefatigable spirit that George and Ryan Anderson have shown
in the fight against
abortion and
in the protracted battle
over «same sex marriage.»
CNN: Viral video shows Romney
in testy exchange over his faith In campaign time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host over the candidate's faith and his stance on abortio
in testy exchange
over his faith
In campaign time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host over the candidate's faith and his stance on abortio
In campaign time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host
over the candidate's faith and his stance on
abortion.
Now, as many of them argue for forcing others to do what they want, like forcing doctors to refer women to abortionists or even participate
in abortions themselves, the traditional goal «has been thrown
over in favor of a crusade to establish what might be called... «comprehensive liberalism» as the official pseudo-religion of the state.»
I often meet
abortion rights advocates who honestly thought that the national controversy
over abortion would simply melt away within a few years of the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing
abortion, handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1973.
(CNN)--
In campaign time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host
over the candidate's faith and his stance on
abortion.
In population control, euthanasia,
abortion, and eugenics, the human person is treated as an object or product to be used or eliminated according to the purposes of those who have power
over others.
These feelings run very deep, and the emotional appeal made
in arguments
over abortion is very strong indeed.
Yes, and there are 300 million citizens
in the US and they can't stop from shooting each other and putting each other behind bars, and ruining the world banking system with dubious methods and instruments and wreck people's retirement savings all
over the world, not to mention the high
abortion rate, murder rate and consumption of resources rate... It's just a disorganized disaster, as opposed to the Nazi's who had an organized disaster.
If both sides can agree on a common objective — to reduce the demand for
abortions, maybe we can do something to make a difference
in people's lives while we disagree
over the larger issue.
I have been a registered nurse for
over 37 years, and I remember caring for young women who had been on the receiving end of an illegal
abortion before it was legal
in this country.
Especially
in a country
in which folk wisdom and popular religion have diverse cultural sources, the appeal to these is often highly divisive, as today
over issues of
abortion and homosexuality and religious practices
in the schools.
From our children's home
in Calcutta alone, we have saved
over 3,000 children from
abortions.
As everyone knows, there is a tremendous cultural struggle going on
in national politics, manifested
in disputes
over abortion, capital punishment, gun control, crime, welfare, affirmative action, gay rights, school prayer, and other kindred things, many of which have a subtle racial dimension.
Over a million
abortions are performed
in America each year.
Arkes remains a convinced incrementalist
in abortion politics: he recounts the battle
over partial - birth
abortion (still ongoing) as a «modest first step» away from the jurisprudence of Roe;
in a similar vein he has hopes that the Born - Alive Act (now signed into law) might help to revive reasoned public discourse about the true character of
abortion.
But a serious analysis of survey data
over time provides little evidence that this fall's election cycle substantially shifted public opinion
in favor of legal
abortion.
In an article on Think Progress, Zach Beauchamp cites a study by political scientists Thomas Carsey and Geoffrey Layman which shows that
over time, people often change their
abortion attitudes to match the political party they generally support.
Don't want an
abortion, don't have one but don't think your personal belief trumps the laws that you must bide by
in this world and please don't think they deserve respect when obviously they are being use to step on other peoples rights to freedom
over their own body.
I care about the life people like you are attempting to force
in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause
abortions all the time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control
over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.
Should one invoke the same arguments used
in the debate
over abortion, or is this a separate issue?
The recent fight
over taxpayer funding of
abortion in the national health - care bill revealed not only that pro-life Democrats exist
in the U.S. Congress but also that they come
in three distinct types: stalwarts, sellouts, and snakes.
My concern was particularly with the pro-life movement, and I noted the general increase
in opposition to
abortion among the neocons
over the last decade.
Again, despite the generous social programs,
over 60 percent of pregnancies to women under 20
in the Netherlands still end
in abortion.
In the debate
over abortion there has been much discussion surrounding «the seamless garment» as a metaphor for the so - called «life issues.»
He went on to say that
over 60 percent of women who come
in for an
abortion are alone and live below the poverty line.
If a large group of people of a certain belief moved into your area becoming the majority they could take
over the hospitals essentially denying you services (as is the case
in much of the south for
abortion).
Related to the third problem, above, there is no change
in the public debates
over cloning,
abortion, euthanasia, and so on.