We're going into a new era where states have more authority
over accountability systems.
We're moving into the era where states are going to have more authority
over accountability systems.
It's looking extremely likely that by January, states will find themselves with a whole lot more discretion
over their accountability systems, interventions in low - performing schools, teacher evaluations, and much else.
Not exact matches
Mr. Flaherty's emphasis on
accountability is important because one of the major weaknesses of regulatory structures as they exist now is a lack of clarity
over who's responsible for safeguarding the entire
system, something officials call «macroprudential regulation.»
New York's
accountability system has evolved
over the years by changes in standards, scoring and how tests are administered.
They should have focused more on increasing the
accountability of the executive to parliament and how elected lords would strengthen parliament's position in a
system where there are too few «checks and balances»
over what governments can get away with.
Focusing on a notion of
accountability which is broader than just league tables and published measurement scores, the Big Education Inquiry argued for greater local control
over schools and education and a democratic input into local school
systems.
The
system over the years has grown unwieldy, with hundreds of authorities, corporations and development agencies cropping up around the state, taking out billions of dollars in debt and for the most part operating with little sunlight or
accountability.
Mayors were required to fund an organization
over which they had no control, which encouraged them to send as little money as possible, and there was little
accountability in the
system.
Both Cuomo and Lhota have said the mayor shares in
accountability over the subway
system.
Our fight is not yet
over to end insider trading in Congress and demand more
accountability in our political
system, to make our food supply safe for American families, and fix the trade policies that have left our local manufacturers competing on an unlevel playing field.
Over pay, pensions, force numbers and, most recently, the
system of local police
accountability, the two are often on opposite sides of the argument.
But perhaps most substantially, there is a growing awareness in the world of education reform that the big battles
over getting new teacher - evaluation laws passed or school
accountability systems implemented are not the end of the story («The Teacher Evaluation Revamp, In Hindsight,» features, Spring 2017).
The review is an important part of the Government's efforts to provide greater independent oversight
over Commonwealth school funding and deliver increased transparency and
accountability to the
system, Mr Birmingham said.
In the debate
over the future of the No Child Left Behind Act, policymakers, educators, and researchers seem to agree on one thing: The federal law's
accountability system should be rewritten so it rewards or sanctions schools on the basis of students» academic growth.
In Ontario, Canada, one of the great PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) success stories, the current provincial administration took
over from one that had instituted a province - wide curriculum and matching assessments, along with a tough
accountability system.
And it's why many of us have supported «top down»
accountability efforts
over the past twenty years — to put pressure on school
systems to put the needs of kids first and to make the tough decisions they might otherwise avoid.
One interpretation of the emphasis on developing the common core curriculum is that these debates provide a convenient diversion from potentially more intractable fights
over bigger reform ideas like using improved teacher evaluations for personnel decisions, expanded school choice, or enhanced
accountability systems.
A unitary
accountability system enables the state to fairly and transparently monitor program compliance and inform the public about performance; make difficult decisions about withholding funds, intervening with local boards, and taking
over schools and districts; and uniformly and thoroughly administer federal programs.
Arne Duncan has also espoused the wisdom of looking at progress
over time, yet his ESEA waiver rules require state
accountability systems to take proficiency rates into account — those are expected to be the drivers in identifying «focus» and «priority» schools.
North Carolina education officials last week ordered a major audit of the state's testing and
accountability program to determine the soundness of the
system after problems emerged
over interim scoring measures for the state's end - of - grade math exam.
According to Duncan, «
Over 40 states are developing next - generation
accountability and support
systems,» guided by the CSSOs, and «many states are moving forward with reforms in teacher and principal evaluation and support, turning around low - performing schools, and expanding access to high - quality schools.»
Longtime Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley had won control
over the school
system in 1995 and generally received accolades for rising scores on state tests; hard - charging superintendents, including Paul Vallas and Arne Duncan; tough
accountability measures such as reduced social promotion; and a slew of new schools and shiny buildings.
That's not surprising; these
accountability systems, like No Child Left Behind (NCLB) in 2002, pushed schools to get more students
over a low performance bar.
So as states create new
accountability systems over the next eighteen months or so, the basic issue will be this: What should be delegated to SEAs, and what should live elsewhere?
Perhaps it is time for central government to yield some of the control
over standards and
accountability that it has amassed in the last 30 years in exchange for the opportunity for districts and schools to innovate around what students are taught and how the actors in the
system are held accountable.
But it stands to be a significant improvement
over the
system we have now, combining top - down
accountability with the energizing, bottom - up forces of choice and competition to put a premium on performance and to drive out much of the complacency that has for so long been the norm in American education.
This is where Bush sees the advantages of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top
over Title I. «The first, he points out, «didn't dictate an
accountability system, just that states had to have one.
If we are ever to restore local control and public
accountability to America's education
system, the College Board's recent power grab must be a central component of the debate
over Common Core.
The Council of Chief State School Officers has worked with several partners
over the past few years on recommendations for those CCR measures best suited for state
accountability systems.
Moreover, if states are worried about year - to - year fluctuations introducing noise into their
accountability systems, they should be thinking about how to average
over multiple years in order to increase the precision of their determinations.
Over time, such
accountability systems included ever - stronger incentives to motivate school administrators, teachers, and students to perform better.
Following
over a decade of strong federal
accountability structures, states are now embarking on the creation of new state - designed
accountability systems, possibly featuring very different strategies from recent years and from each other.
Over the past decade, taxpayers have spent considerable sums to develop existing state
accountability systems:
The Quality Single
Accountability System (QSAC), which is the state's way of monitoring schools, gives the state the power to take
over a district.
As innovative assessments are administered and used for
accountability and reporting in participating schools, states in the demonstration authority can apply lessons learned from implementation to improve their innovative
systems and take these projects to scale, building a new statewide assessment
system over 5 years - one that is high - quality, fair, and worth taking.
As states redesign their school
accountability systems under ESSA, there is disagreement
over the best way to measure and communicate school performance.
The 2005 legislative session was relatively quiet on the subject of K - 12 education, despite tension
over changes to the state's school
accountability system between Gov. Bill Owens, a Republican, and the Colorado legislature, which was controlled for the first time in 40 years by Democrats
Rather than provide states and districts with more control
over their
accountability and improvement
systems, as Congress intends, the side effects of the CRA can actually impinge on these efforts.
A new paper by USC assistant professor (and Emerging Education Policy Scholar) Morgan Polikoff and his colleagues finds that many of the state
accountability systems approved under the waivers continue to rely predominantly on proficiency rates instead of individual student progress
over time.
Given ongoing disagreement
over the purpose of schooling, it's always going to be a challenge devising
accountability systems that are sustainable and broadly supported.
Over the past decade, California has been a holdout from some of the big national reforms that most other states have embraced, especially clear and tough school
accountability systems and test - based teacher evaluations.
That the publicized school grades have a direct effect on respondent ratings
over and above the relationship between ratings and the underlying point variables suggests that the signals provided by the state's school
accountability system do in fact affect citizen perceptions of their local schools.
Regardless of the circumstances, our society and our
accountability systems celebrate timeliness
over perseverance.
(Calif.) Confronted with a host of new policies and conditions created by a wholesale restructuring of the school testing and
accountability system, local educational agencies submitted 416 waiver applications last year — a 30 percent increase
over 2016.
«The topic of principal evaluations has largely been ignored in the current debate
over evaluations, but teachers want to see principals lead by example and that is why we need an evaluation
system that not only will help principals improve, but also increase
accountability and ensure that teachers are fully supported.
A lot of change has happened in California public education
over the last decade, from standards - based instruction to funding formulas to local control and
accountability to scorecards and
systems of support.
Former LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who once attempted to take
over LA Unified and later founded a public school network, criticized the state's new
accountability system Wednesday at a panel discussion with education experts.
Callen: Poll shows Mississippians want school choice Grant Callen, Guest Columnist, January 10, 2016
Over the past four years, our state Legislature has adopted a handful of key reforms designed to strengthen our education
system by providing students with new education options and taxpayers with more
accountability and transparency.
There are also growing disputes among reformers
over the role of for - profit companies, and what type of regulation and
accountability a choice - based
system really needs.